Thalidomide was a widely used drug in the late 1950s and early 1960s for the treatment of nausea in pregnant women. It became apparent in the 1960s that thalidomide treatment resulted in severe birth defects in thousands of children. Though the use of thalidomide was banned in most countries at that time, thalidomide proved to be a useful treatment for leprosy and later, multiple myeloma. In rural areas of the world that lack extensive medical surveillance initiatives, thalidomide treatment of pregnant women with leprosy has continued to cause malformations. Research on thalidomide mechanisms of action is leading to a better understanding of molecular targets. With an improved understanding of these molecular targets, safer drugs may be designed. The thalidomide tragedy marked a turning point in toxicity testing, as it prompted United States and international regulatory agencies to develop systematic toxicity testing protocols; the use of thalidomide as a tool in developmental biology led to important discoveries in the biochemical pathways of limb development. In celebration of the Society of Toxicology's 50th Anniversary, which coincides with the 50th anniversary of the withdrawal of thalidomide from the market, it is appropriate to revisit the lessons learned from the thalidomide tragedy of the 1960s.
TURNER-MCGRIEVY, GABRIELLE M., NEAL D. BARNARD, AND ANTHONY R. SCIALLI. A two-year randomized weight loss trial comparing a vegan diet to a more moderate low-fat diet. Obesity. 2007;15:2276-2281. Objective: The objective was to assess the effect of a low-fat, vegan diet compared with the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) diet on weight loss maintenance at 1 and 2 years. Research Methods and Procedures: Sixty-four overweight, postmenopausal women were randomly assigned to a vegan or NCEP diet for 14 weeks, and 62 women began the study. The study was done in two replications. Participants in the first replication (N ϭ 28) received no follow-up support after the 14 weeks, and those in the second replication (N ϭ 34) were offered group support meetings for 1 year. Weight and diet adherence were measured at 1 and 2 years for all participants. Weight loss is reported as median (interquartile range) and is the difference from baseline weight at years 1 and 2. Results: Individuals in the vegan group lost more weight than those in the NCEP group at 1 year [Ϫ4.9 (Ϫ0.5, Ϫ8.0) kg vs. Ϫ1.8 (0.8, Ϫ4.3); p Ͻ 0.05] and at 2 years [Ϫ3.1 (0.0, Ϫ6.0) kg vs. Ϫ0.8 (3.1, Ϫ4.2) kg; p Ͻ 0.05]. Those participants offered group support lost more weight at 1 year (p Ͻ 0.01) and 2 years (p Ͻ 0.05) than those without support. Attendance at meetings was associated with improved weight loss at 1 year (p Ͻ 0.001) and 2 years (p Ͻ 0.01). Discussion: A vegan diet was associated with significantly greater weight loss than the NCEP diet at 1 and 2 years. Both group support and meeting attendance were associated with significant weight loss at follow-up.
Folate is a water-soluble B vitamin that must be obtained in the diet or through supplementation. For >50 yr, it has been known that folate plays an integral role in embryonic development. In mice, inactivation of genes in the folate pathway results in malformations of the neural tube, heart, and craniofacial structures. It has been shown that diets and blood levels of women who had a fetus with a neural tube defect are low for several micronutrients, particularly folate. Periconceptional use of folic acid containing supplements decreased recurrent neural tube defects in the offspring of women with a previously affected child and the occurrence of a neural tube defect and possibly other birth defects in the offspring of women with no prior history. Based on these findings, the U.S. Public Health Service recommended that all women at risk take folic acid supplements, but many did not. Mandatory food fortification programs were introduced in numerous countries, including the United States, to improve folate nutritional status and have resulted in a major decrease in neural tube defect prevalence. The success story of folate represents the cooperation of embryologists, experimentalists, epidemiologists, public health scientists, and policymakers.
The dose of toxicant reaching the embryo is a critical determinant of developmental toxicity, and is likely to be a key factor responsible for interspecies variability in response to many test agents. This review compares the mechanisms regulating disposition of toxicants from the maternal circulation to the embryo during organogenesis in humans and the two species used predominantly in regulatory developmental toxicity testing, rats and rabbits. These three species utilize fundamentally different strategies for maternal-embryonic exchange during early pregnancy. Early postimplantation rat embryos rely on the inverted visceral yolk sac placenta, which is in intimate contact with the uterine epithelium and is equipped with an extensive repertoire of transport mechanisms, such as pinocytosis, endocytosis, and specific transporter proteins. Also, the rat yolk sac completely surrounds the embryo, such that the fluid-filled exocoelom survives through most of the period of organogenesis, and can concentrate compounds such as certain weak acids due to pH differences between maternal blood and exocelomic fluid. The early postimplantation rabbit conceptus differs from the rat in that the yolk sac is not closely apposed to the uterus during early organogenesis and does not completely enclose the embryo until relatively later in development (approximately GD13). This suggests that the early rabbit yolk sac might be a relatively inefficient transporter, a conclusion supported by limited data with ethylene glycol and one of its predominant metabolites, glycolic acid, given to GD9 rabbits. In humans, maternal-embryo exchange is thought to occur via the chorioallantoic placenta, although it has recently been conjectured that a supplemental route of transfer could occur via absorption into the yolk sac. Knowledge of the mechanisms underlying species-specific embryonic disposition, factored together with other pharmacokinetic characteristics of the test compound and knowledge of critical periods of susceptibility, can be used on a case-by-case basis to make more accurate extrapolations of test animal data to the human.
Testosterone products are recommended by some prescribers in response to a diagnosis or presumption of “low testosterone” (low-T) for cardiovascular health, sexual function, muscle weakness or wasting, mood and behavior, and cognition. We performed a systematic review of 156 eligible randomized controlled trials in which testosterone was compared to placebo for one or more of these conditions. We included studies in bibliographic databases between January 1, 1950 and April 9, 2016, and excluded studies involving bodybuilding, contraceptive effectiveness, or treatment of any condition in women or children. Studies with multiple relevant endpoints were included in all relevant tables. Testosterone supplementation did not show consistent benefit for cardiovascular risk, sexual function, mood and behavior, or cognition. Studies that examined clinical cardiovascular endpoints have not favored testosterone therapy over placebo. Testosterone is ineffective in treating erectile dysfunction and controlled trials did not show a consistent effect on libido. Testosterone supplementation consistently increased muscle strength but did not have beneficial effects on physical function. Most studies on mood-related endpoints found no beneficial effect of testosterone treatment on personality, psychological well-being, or mood. The prescription of testosterone supplementation for low-T for cardiovascular health, sexual function, physical function, mood, or cognitive function is without support from randomized clinical trials.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.