In the present study, we examined whether fear of pain, dental fear, general indices of psychological distress, and self-reported stress levels differed between 40 orofacial pain patients and 40 gender and age matched control general dental patients. We also explored how fear of pain, as measured by the Fear of Pain Questionnaire-III (J Behav Med 21 (1998) 389), relates to established measures of psychological problems in our sample of patients. Finally, we examined whether fear of pain uniquely and significantly predicts dental fear and psychological distress relative to other theoretically-relevant psychological factors. Our results indicate that fear of severe pain and anxiety-related distress, broadly defined, are particularly elevated in orofacial pain patients relative to matched controls. Additionally, fear of pain shares a significant relation with dental fear but not other general psychological symptomology, and uniquely and significantly predicts dental fear relative to other theoretically-relevant variables. Taken together, these data, in conjunction with other recent studies, suggest greater attention be placed on understanding the fear of pain in orofacial pain patients and its relation to dental fear and anxiety.
This study examined the success of tita-level of PB 0·05. Fracture of retainers in both metals occurred only in the first 12 months. Some failure nium (Ti) removable partial dentures (RPDs) compared with that of cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) RPDs types presented at significantly higher levels in the first 12 months but there were no significant differ-using a randomized controlled clinical trial. Thirtyences between the two in all the criteria examined eight RPD patients were provided with either Cobetween the 12-and the 24-month reviews. Al-Cr (20 patients) or Ti (18 patients) RPDs. The total numbers of dentures was 31 (13 maxillary, 18 though differences existed in failure types between Co -Cr and Ti RPDs during the early review stages, mandibular) for Co-Cr and 23 (11 maxillary, 12 the overall success rate of Ti RPDs was comparable mandibular) for Ti. Patients were reviewed for with that of Co -Cr RPDs after 24 months. The 24 months following denture issue. After the initial higher incidence of failures in Ti RPDs prior to the 12 months, 20 clinical problems were recorded and became the criteria for subsequent assessment. Inci-12-month review suggests the importance of taking dence of failure was analysed using both Fisher's its lower rigidity into account when designing exact test and the chi square test at a significance RPDs.
This study examined the success of titanium (Ti) removable partial dentures (RPDs) compared with that of cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) RPDs using a randomized controlled clinical trial. Thirty-eight RPD patients were provided with either Co-Cr (20 patients) or Ti (18 patients) RPDs. The total numbers of dentures was 31 (13 maxillary, 18 mandibular) for Co-Cr and 23 (11 maxillary, 12 mandibular) for Ti. Patients were reviewed for 24 months following denture issue. After the initial 12 months, 20 clinical problems were recorded and became the criteria for subsequent assessment. Incidence of failure was analysed using both Fisher's exact test and the chi square test at a significance level of P<0.05. Fracture of retainers in both metals occurred only in the first 12 months. Some failure types presented at significantly higher levels in the first 12 months but there were no significant differences between the two in all the criteria examined between the 12- and the 24-month reviews. Although differences existed in failure types between Co-Cr and Ti RPDs during the early review stages, the overall success rate of Ti RPDs was comparable with that of Co-Cr RPDs after 24 months. The higher incidence of failures in Ti RPDs prior to the 12-month review suggests the importance of taking its lower rigidity into account when designing RPDs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.