Objectives: Trauma resuscitations are complex critical care events that present patient safety-related risk. Simulation-based leadership training is thought to improve trauma care; however, there is no robust evidence supporting the impact of leadership training on clinical performance. The objective of this study was to assess the clinical impact of simulation-based leadership training on team leadership and patient care during actual trauma resuscitations. Design: Randomized controlled trial. Setting: Harborview Medical Center (level 1 trauma center). Subjects: Seventy-nine second- and third-year residents were randomized and 360 resuscitations were analyzed. Interventions: Subjects were randomized to a 4-hour simulation-based leadership training (intervention) or standard orientation (control) condition. Measurements and Main Results: Participant-led actual trauma resuscitations were video recorded and coded for leadership behaviors and patient care. We used random coefficient modeling to account for the nesting effect of multiple observations within residents and to test for post-training group differences in leadership behaviors while controlling for pre-training behaviors, Injury Severity Score, postgraduate training year, and days since training occurred. Sixty participants completed the study. There was a significant difference in post-training leadership behaviors between the intervention and control conditions (b1 = 4.06, t (55) = 6.11, p < 0.001; intervention M = 11.29, se = 0.66, 95% CI, 9.99–12.59 vs control M = 7.23, se = 0.46, 95% CI, 6.33–8.13, d = 0.92). Although patient care was similar between conditions (b = 2.00, t (55) = 0.99, p = 0.325; predicted means intervention M = 62.38, se = 2.01, 95% CI, 58.43–66.33 vs control M = 60.38, se = 1.37, 95% CI, 57.69–63.07, d = 0.15), a test of the mediation effect between training and patient care suggests leadership behaviors mediate an effect of training on patient care with a significant indirect effect (b = 3.44, 95% CI, 1.43–5.80). Across all trauma resuscitations leadership was significantly related to patient care (b1 = 0.61, se = 0.15, t (273) = 3.64, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Leadership training resulted in the transfer of complex skills to the clinical environment and may have an indirect effect on patient care through better team leadership.

Team leadership facilitates teamwork and is important to patient care. It is unknown whether physician gender-based differences in team leadership exist. The objective of this study was to assess and compare team leadership and patient care in trauma resuscitations led by male and female physicians. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of data from a larger randomized controlled trial using video recordings of emergency department trauma resuscitations at a Level 1 trauma center from April 2016 to December 2017. Subjects included emergency medicine and surgery residents functioning as trauma team leaders. Eligible resuscitations included adult patients meeting institutional trauma activation criteria. Two video-recorded observations for each participant were coded for team leadership quality and patient care by 2 sets of raters. Raters were balanced with regard to gender and were blinded to study hypotheses. We used Bayesian regression to determine whether our data supported gender-based advantages in team leadership. Results: A total of 60 participants and 120 video recorded observations were included. The modal relationship between gender and team leadership (β = 0.94, 95% highest density interval [HDI],-.68 to 2.52) and gender and patient care (β = 2.42, 95% HDI,-2.03 to 6.78) revealed a weak positive effect for female leaders on both outcomes. Gender-based advantages to team leadership and clinical care were not conclusively

OBJECTIVES/SPECIFIC AIMS: The objective of this research was to assess the clinical impact of simulation-based team leadership training on team leadership effectiveness and patient care during actual trauma resuscitations. This translational work addresses an important gap in simulation research and medical education research. METHODS/STUDY POPULATION: Eligible trauma team leaders were randomized to the intervention (4-hour simulation-based leadership training) or control (standard training) condition. Subject-led actual trauma patient resuscitations were video recorded and coded for leadership behaviors (primary outcome) and patient care (secondary outcome) using novel leadership and trauma patient care metrics. Patient outcomes for trauma resuscitations were obtained through the Harborview Medical Center Trauma Registry and analyzed descriptively. A one-way ANCOVA analysis was conducted to test the effectiveness of our training intervention versus a control group for each outcome (leadership effectiveness and patient care) while accounting for pre-training performance, injury severity score, postgraduate training year, and days since training occurred. Association between leadership effectiveness and patient care was evaluated using random coefficient modeling. RESULTS/ANTICIPATED RESULTS: Sixty team leaders, 30 in each condition, completed the study. There was a significant difference in post-training leadership effectiveness [F(1,54)=30.19, p<.001, η2=.36] between the experimental and control conditions. There was no direct impact of training on patient care [F(1,54)=1.0, p=0.33, η2=.02]; however, leadership effectiveness mediated an indirect effect of training on patient care. Across all trauma resuscitations team leader effectiveness correlated with patient care (p<0.05) as predicted by team leadership conceptual models. DISCUSSION/SIGNIFICANCE OF IMPACT: This work represents a critical step in advancing translational simulation-based research (TSR). While there are several examples of high quality translational research programs, they primarily focus on procedural tasks and do not evaluate highly complex skills such as leadership. Complex skills present significant measurement challenges because individuals and processes are interrelated, with multiple components and emergent nature of tasks and related behaviors. We provide evidence that simulation-based training of a complex skill (team leadership behavior) transfers to a complex clinical setting (emergency department) with highly variable clinical tasks (trauma resuscitations). Our novel team leadership training significantly improved overall leadership performance and partially mediated the positive effect between leadership and patient care. This represents the first rigorous, randomized, controlled trial of a leadership or teamwork-focused training that systematically evaluates the impact on process (leadership) and performance (patient care).

Introduction: Effective team leadership is linked to better patient care during resuscitations. Several studies suggest a relationship between team leader gender and the quality of resuscitation leadership and clinical care. However, these studies have been either (1) retrospective investigations that do not capture clinical care processes or (2) simulation-based research involving novice medical student subjects. The objective of this study is to compare the quality of team leadership and clinical care between male- and female-led trauma resuscitation teams. Hypothesis: We hypothesize that team leader gender is not associated with differences in trauma team leadership and clinical care Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of prospectively acquired data by analyzing video recordings of trauma resuscitations at a Level 1 trauma center. Subjects (n=60) included 2 nd and 3 rd year emergency medicine and surgery residents functioning in the team leader role. Two video recorded observations for each participant (n=120) were coded for team leadership and clinical care by two sets of raters balanced with regard to gender and blinded to study hypothesis. Duplicate coding was performed on 10% of the observations. We analyzed data using random coefficient modeling (RCM), controlling for patient injury severity score and subject postgraduate training year. Results: We found no significant difference between men and women on team leadership behavior (p=.43; Men: M=7.63, SE = 0.54; Women: M = 8.67, SE = 0.74) nor on clinical care (p=.39; Men: M = 62.32, SE = 1.50; Women: M = 64.87, SE = 2.57). Effect sizes were modest in favor of women and nonsignificant for both team leadership behavior ( d = .26) and clinical care ( d =.21). Conclusion: Our prospective evaluation of team leadership quality and clinical care during trauma resuscitations does not support a male performance advantage, contradicting previous simulation-based work. Focusing on effective team leadership behaviors, not inherent traits and leadership styles, will allow resuscitation leaders to optimize their individual and team performance, irrespective of gender. Further work is needed to develop training and cognitive aids capable of supporting team leadership during complex resuscitative care.

No abstract