No abstract

Objective This study evaluates the long-term outcomes, biliary complication rates, and risk factors for biliary complications after liver transplantation from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors. Summary Background Data Recent enthusiasm toward increased use of DCD donor livers is mitigated by high biliary complication rates. Predictive risk factors for the development of biliary complications after DCD liver transplantation remain incompletely defined. Methods We performed a retrospective review of 1157 donation after brain death (DBD) and 87 DCD liver transplants performed between January 1, 1993 and December 31, 2008. Patient and graft survivals, and complication rates within the first year of transplantation were compared between DBD and DCD groups. Cox proportional hazards models were used to assess the influence of potential risk factors. Results Patient survival was significantly lower in the DCD group compared to the DBD group at 1, 5, 10 and 15 years (DCD: 84%, 68%, 54%, 54% vs. DBD: 91%, 81%, 67%, 58%, p<0.01). Graft survival was also significantly lower in the DCD group compared to the DBD group at 1, 5, 10 and 15 years (DCD: 69%, 56%, 43%, 43% vs. DBD: 86%, 76%, 60%, 51%, p<0.001). Rates of overall biliary complications (OBC) (DCD: 47% vs. DBD: 26%, p<0.01) and ischemic cholangiopathy (IC) (DCD: 34% vs. DBD: 1%, p<0.01) were significantly higher in the DCD group. Donor age (HR: 1.04, p<0.01) and donor age >40 years (HR: 3.13, p < 0.01) were significant risk factors for the development of OBC. Multivariate analysis revealed cold ischemic time (CIT) >8 hours (HR: 2.46, p=0.05), donor age >40 (HR: 2.90, p< 0.01) significantly increased the risk of IC. Conclusions Long-term patient and graft survival after DCD liver transplantation remain significantly lower but acceptable when compared to DBD liver transplants. Donor age and CIT >8 hours are the strongest predictors for the development of ischemic cholangiopathy. Careful selection of younger DCD donors and minimizing CIT may limit the incidence of severe biliary complications and improve the successful utilization of DCD donor livers.

A national conference on organ donation after cardiac death (DCD) was convened to expand the practice of DCD in the continuum of quality end-of-life care.This national conference affirmed the ethical propriety of DCD as not violating the dead donor rule. Further, by new developments not previously reported, the conference resolved controversy regarding the period of circulatory cessation that determines death and allows administration of pre-recovery pharmacologic agents, it established conditions of DCD eligibility, it presented current data regarding the successful transplantation of organs from DCD, it proposed a new framework of data reporting regarding ischemic events, it made specific recommendations to agencies and organizations to remove barriers to DCD, it brought guidance regarding organ allocation and the process of informed consent and it set an action plan to address media issues. When a consensual decision is made to withdraw life support by the attending physician and patient or by the attending physician and a family member or surrogate (particularly in an intensive care unit), a routine opportunity for DCD should be available to honor the deceased donor's wishes in every donor service area (DSA) of the United States. Key words: Deceased organ donation Received 25 July 2005, revised and accepted for publication 24 October 2005A national conference on organ donation after cardiac death (DCD) was convened in Philadelphia on April 7 and 8, 2005, to address the increasing experience of DCD and to affirm the ethical propriety of transplanting organs from such donors. Participants represented the broad spectrum of the medical community, including neuroscientists, critical care professionals and distinguished bioethicists (Appendix 1).Six work groups were assembled to address specific DCD issues and fulfill the conference objectives: (i) determining death by a cardiopulmonary criterion, (ii) assessing medical criteria that predict DCD candidacy following the withdrawal of life support, (iii) reviewing protocols for successful DCD organ recovery and subsequent transplantation, (iv) initiating DCD in donation service areas (DSAs), (v) discussing the allocation of DCD organs for transplantation and (vi) examining perceptions of DCD held by the media and the public. Work Group 1: Determining Death by a Cardiopulmonary CriterionA prospective organ donor's death may be determined by either cardiopulmonary (DCD) or neurologic criteria (donation after brain death [DBD]) (1). The term donation after cardiac death (DCD) clearly indicates that death precedes donation. Death determination in the DCD patient mandates the use of a cardiopulmonary criterion to prove the absence of circulation. The cardiopulmonary criterion may be used when the donor does not fulfill brain death criteria. The ethical axiom of organ donation necessitates adherence to the dead donor rule: the retrieval of organs for transplantation should not cause the death of a donor (2).In clinical situations that fulfill either brain death criteria ...

No abstract

The American Society of Transplant Surgeons (ASTS) champions efforts to increase organ donation. Controlled donation after cardiac death (DCD) offers the family and the patient with a hopeless prognosis the option to donate when brain death criteria will not be met. Although DCD is increasing, this endeavor is still in the midst of development. DCD protocols, recovery techniques and organ acceptance criteria vary among organ procurement organizations and transplant centers. Growing enthusiasm for DCD has been tempered by the decreased yield of transplantable organs and less favorable posttransplant outcomes compared with donation after brain death. Logistics and ethics relevant to DCD engender discussion and debate among lay and medical communities. Regulatory oversight of the mandate to increase DCD and a recent lawsuit involving professional behavior during an attempted DCD have fueled scrutiny of this activity. Within this setting, the ASTS Council sought best-practice guidelines for controlled DCD organ donation and transplantation. The proposed guidelines are evidence based when possible. They cover many aspects of DCD kidney, liver and pancreas transplantation, including donor characteristics, consent, withdrawal of ventilatory support, operative technique, ischemia times, machine perfusion, recipient considerations and biliary issues. DCD organ transplantation involves unique challenges that these recommendations seek to address.