No abstract

Previous studies have failed to reveal an effect of the gastrointestinal peptide hormone ghrelin on colonic motility. In the present work, ghrelin was applied into the lumbo-sacral spinal cord in the region of defecation control centres, and a synthetic ghrelin receptor agonist, CP464709, which crosses the blood-brain barrier, was applied intravenously or into the lumbo-sacral cord. Both ghrelin and CP464709 elicited propulsive contractions and emptying of the colon in anaesthetized rats. In conscious rats, subcutaneous CP464709 caused fecal expulsion. The sites of action and nerve pathways involved in the stimulation of the colon by ghrelin receptor activation were investigated in anaesthetized rats. Intrathecal application of CP464709 at L6-S1, but not application at ponto-medullary levels or to the thoracic spinal cord, elicited propulsive contractions. The stimulation evoked by intravenous CP464709 was prevented if the pelvic nerve outflows were severed, but not if the spinal cord was cut rostral to the defecation centre at L6-S3. The response was also blocked by hexamethonium. When ghrelin, applied intrathecally, was used to desensitize its receptors, the effect of intravenous CP464709 was blocked. CP464709 did not affect small intestine motility or the amplitudes of visceromotor reflexes caused by colorectal distension. It is concluded that activation of ghrelin receptors in the lumbo-sacral spinal cord triggers co-ordinated propulsive contractions that empty the colo-rectum. The pathways through which these responses are generated pass out of the spinal cord via the pelvic nerves and cause propulsive contractions through activation of enteric neurons.

We have developed methods that allow correlation of propulsive reflexes of the intestine with measurements of intraluminal pressure, fluid movement and spatio-temporal maps of intestinal wall movements for the first time in vivo. A segment of jejunum was cannulated and set up in a Trendelenburg recording system while remaining connected to the vascular and nerve supply of the anaesthetized rat. The resting intraluminal pressure in intact intestine was 2-4 mmHg. Hydrostatic pressures of 2, 4, 8 and 16 mmHg were imposed. At a baseline pressure of 4 mmHg, propulsive waves generated pressures of 9 +/- 1 mmHg, that progressed oral to anal at 2-5 mm s(-1). Individual propulsive waves propelled 0.8 +/- 0.4 mL of fluid. The frequency of propulsive waves increased with pressure, but peristaltic efficiency (mL per contraction) decreased with pressure increase between 4 and 16 mmHg. Atropine, as a bolus, transiently blocked peristalsis, but caused maintained block when infused. Hexamethonium blocked propulsive contractions. Inhibition of nitrergic transmission converted regular peristalsis to non-propulsive contractions. These studies demonstrate the utility of an adapted Trendelenburg method for quantitative investigation of motility and pharmacology of enteric reflexes in vivo.

Vagal nerve stimulation is widely used therapeutically but the fiber groups activated are often unknown. Aim: To establish a simple protocol to define stimulus thresholds for vagal A, B and C fibers. Methods:The intact left or right cervical vagus was stimulated with 0.1 ms pulses in spontaneously breathing anesthetized rats. Heart and respiratory rate responses to vagal stimulation were recorded. The vagus was subsequently cut distally, and mass action potentials to the same stimuli were recorded. Results: Stimulating at either 50 Hz for 2 s or 2 Hz for 10 s at experimentally determined strengths revealed A, B and C fiber thresholds that were related to respiratory and heart rate changes. Conclusion: Our simple protocol discriminates vagal A, B and C fiber thresholds in vivo.