Background A conditionally replication-defective human cytomegalovirus (CMV) vaccine (V160) derived from AD169 and genetically engineered to express CMV pentameric complex (gH/gL/pUL128/pUL130/pUL131) was developed and evaluated for phase 1 vaccine safety and immunogenicity in CMV-seronegative and CMV-seropositive adults. Methods Subjects received 3 doses of V160 or placebo on day 1, month 1, and month 6. Four vaccine dose levels, formulated with or without aluminum phosphate adjuvant, were evaluated. Injection-site and systemic adverse events (AEs) and vaccine viral shedding were monitored. CMV-specific cellular and humoral responses were measured by interferon-gamma ELISPOT and virus neutralization assay up to 12 months after last dose. Results V160 was generally well-tolerated, with no serious AEs observed. Transient, mild-to-moderate injection-site and systemic AEs were reported more frequently in vaccinated subjects than placebo. Vaccine viral shedding was not detected in any subject, confirming the nonreplicating feature of V160. Robust neutralizing antibody titers were elicited and maintained through 12 months postvaccination. Cellular responses to structural and nonstructural viral proteins were observed, indicating de novo expression of viral genes postvaccination. Conclusions V160 displayed an acceptable safety profile. Levels of neutralizing antibodies and T-cell responses in CMV-seronegative subjects were within ranges observed following natural CMV infection. Clinical Trial Registration . NCT01986010.

Background Preventing congenital cytomegalovirus infection (CMVi) is an important unmet need. Natural maternal immunity to CMV acquired prior to pregnancy appears to reduce fetal transmission. In a Phase 1 trial, V160, a replication-defective CMV vaccine expressing the pentameric complex, induced humoral and cell-mediated immune (CMI) responses comparable to natural immunity. Methods Healthy, CMV-seronegative women aged 16–35 years were randomized 1:1:1 to receive double-blind V160 in a 3- or 2-dose regimen or placebo. Primary and secondary endpoints were efficacy in reducing the incidence of CMVi with 3-dose or 2-dose regimens of V160 vs placebo, respectively, using a fixed-event design. Monthly urine and saliva samples were collected to identify CMVi by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with a single positive sample considered evidence of infection. Immunoglobulin G (IgG) binding to glycoprotein B (gB) and CMV-specific neutralizing antibody (NAb) were measured in all participants, and CMI responses were measured in a subset. Injection-site and systemic adverse events (AEs) were collected for 5 days and 14 days, respectively, after each vaccination and serious AEs were collected for the trial duration. Results 2200 women from 7 countries were enrolled (of 7458 screened). Over 80% of participants received all doses, and compliance with saliva and urine samples was > 95%. Vaccine efficacy (VE) of 42.4% (95% CI -13.5, 71.1%) was demonstrated in the 3-dose group vs placebo. In the 2-dose group, VE was -32.0% (95% CI -135.0, 25.0%). Both the quantity and duration of CMV shedding in urine and saliva among cases of CMVi decreased in the 3-dose, but not the 2-dose group vs placebo. Both V160 regimens elicited humoral and CMI responses detected by CMV-specific NAb, gB IgG, and ELISpot, which peaked at Month 7 and continued to be detectable at Month 24. Mild to moderate AEs were more frequently reported in V160 vs placebo recipients, but no vaccine-related serious AEs or deaths were reported. Conclusion V160 was well tolerated and immunogenic, but neither the 3-dose nor 2-dose regimen demonstrated significant efficacy against CMVi as defined in this trial. The quantity and duration of CMV shedding was reduced in the 3-dose group, suggesting V160 may improve immune control of viral replication after CMVi. Disclosures Rituparna Das, MD, Merck & Co, Inc. (Employee) Daniel Blazquez-Gamero, MD, MSD (Other Financial or Material Support, Fees for lectures in educational activities) Soren Gantt, MD, Altona Diagnostics (Research Grant or Support)Merck (Consultant, Grant/Research Support)Meridian Biosciences (Research Grant or Support)Moderna (Consultant, Research Grant or Support)VBI Vaccines Inc (Research Grant or Support) Oliver Bautista, PhD, Merck & Co, Inc. (Employee) Karen Beck, RN, BSN, Merck & Co, Inc. (Employee) Anthony Conlon, PhD, Merck & Co, Inc. (Employee) Daniel Rosenbloom, PhD, Merck & Co, Inc. (Employee) Dai Wang, PhD, Merck & Co, Inc. (Employee) Michael Ritter, BA, Merck & Co, Inc. (Employee) Beth Arnold, MS, Merck & Co, Inc. (Employee, Shareholder) Paula Annunziato, MD, Merck & Co, Inc. (Employee) Kevin Russell, MD, MTM&H, Merck & Co., Inc. (Employee, Shareholder)

BackgroundCongenital CMV remains an unmet medical need worldwide. Naturally acquired CMV immunity in women prior to pregnancy has been shown effective in reducing maternal-fetal transmission. V160 is engineered as a replication-defective CMV, and its replication in culture is controlled by a synthetic chemical. V160 can’t replicate in humans but it maintains all virological properties for presentation of viral antigens, including gH/gL/pUL128-131 pentameric complex, important for potent neutralizing antibodies (NABs).MethodsApproximately 190 CMV seronegative and seropositive adults at study entry received 3 doses of V160 or placebo administered via intramuscular (IM) or intradermal (ID) route on Day 1, Month 1, and Month 6. Four antigen levels (10, 30, 100, and 250 units per dose) formulated with or without aluminum phosphate adjuvant were evaluated. In each vaccination group, approximately 10 and 4 subjects received study vaccine and placebo, respectively. Injection site and systemic adverse events (AEs) were collected for 14 days after each vaccination. Serious AEs (SAEs) were assessed up to Month 18. Viral shedding (urine and saliva) were monitored up to Month 12. CMV-specific NABs and cell-mediated immune responses (CMI) were measured prior and 1 month after each vaccination, and at Months 12 and 18.ResultsDuring the study, no serious AEs were reported and only one CMV seropositive subject had non-vaccine type viral shedding. In both seronegative and seropositive cohorts, proportion of subjects who reported injection site AEs was higher in V160 recipients than placebo controls. Proportion of subjects who reported systemic AEs was comparable across V160 doses/formulations and placebo. In the CMV seronegative cohort, immune responses increased with incremental dosing. More importantly, recipients of V160 from several dose levels mounted NAB and CMI responses at 1 month post dose 3 (PD3) that were comparable to baseline levels measured in seropositive subjects.ConclusionV160 had acceptable safety profile across all dose levels and formulations studied; Vaccine was immunogenic and elicited NAB and CMI responses at 1 month PD3 that were comparable to natural CMV infection.Disclosures S. Adler, Merck: Investigator, Research grant. N. Lewis, Merck: Employee, Salary. A. Conlon, Merck: Employee, Salary. M. Christiansen, Merck: Investigator, Research grant. M. S. Al-Ibrahim, Merck: Investigator, Research grant R. Rupp, Merck: Investigator, Research grant. T. M. Fu, Merck: Employee, Salary. O. Bautista, Merck: Employee, Salary. H. Tang, Merck: Employee, Salary.T. Culp, Merck: Employee, Salary. R. Das, Merck: Employee, Salary. K. Beck, Merck: Employee, Salary. G. Tamms, Merck: Employee, Salary. L. Musey, Meck: Employee, Salary.