[1] Ar-Ar dating of basalt flows capping terrace deposits of the River Euphrates in northern Syria has provided a new quantitative chronology for the late Cenozoic evolution of this important river system and for the associated history of surface uplift of the northern Arabian Platform through which it flows, a region of relatively strong crust that has experienced only slow deformation. Notably, fluvial deposits $65 m above the Euphrates are overlain by basalt dated to 2717 ± 20 ka, those $45 m above the river are overlain by basalt dated to 2116 ± 39 ka, and those 8-9 m above the river are overlain by basalt dated to 402 ± 11 ka. These new dates require the previous dating scheme, based on Paleolithic archaeology, to be revised; the Euphrates terrace deposits and the associated incised valley are much older than was previously thought. Rates of incision by the Euphrates, providing a proxy for regional surface uplift that is inferred to be the isostatic response to regional erosion, have varied significantly over the past $3 Ma, with indications that between $1.2 and $0.9 Ma, there was regional subsidence, which gave rise to fluvial aggradation. This unusual pattern, involving reversals in the sense of vertical crustal motions, is interpreted to be a consequence of a relatively cold and thin mobile lower crustal layer, no more than $5 km thick, evidently due to the presence of a much thicker underlying layer of mafic underplating at the base of the crust. This study thus indicates previously unsuspected complexity in the isostatic response to regional erosion in an area of high crustal stability. Citation: Demir, T

No abstract

Use policyThe full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy for further details.

No abstract

We report four new Ar/Ar dates and 18 new geochemical analyses of Pleistocene basalts from the Karasu Valley of southern Turkey. These rocks have become offset left-laterally by slip on the N20°E-striking Amanos Fault. The geochemical analyses help to correlate some of the less-obvious offset fragments of basalt flows, and thus to measure amounts of slip; the dates enable slip rates to be calculated. On the basis of four individual slip-rate determinations, obtained in this manner, we estimate a weighted mean slip rate for this fault of 2.89±0.05mm/a (±2σ). We have also obtained a slip rate of 2.68±0.54mm/a (±2σ) for the subparallel East Hatay Fault farther east. Summing these values gives 5.57±0.54mm/a (±2σ) as the overall left-lateral slip rate across the Dead Sea fault zone (DSFZ) in the Karasu Valley. These slip-rate estimates and other evidence from farther south on the DSFZ are consistent with a preferred Euler vector for the relative rotation of the Arabian and African plates of 0.434±0.012° Ma−1 about 31.1°N, 26.7°E. The Amanos Fault is misaligned to the tangential direction to this pole by 52° in the transpressive sense. Its geometry thus requires significant fault-normal distributed crustal shortening, taken up by crustal thickening and folding, in the adjacent Amanos Mountains. The vertical component of slip on the Amanos Fault is estimated as c. 0.15mm/a. This minor component contributes to the uplift of the Amanos Mountains, which reaches rates of c. 0.2–0.4mm/a. These slip rate estimates are considered representative of time since. 3.73±0.05Ma, when the modern geometry of strike-slip faulting developed in this region; an estimated 11km of slip on the Amanos Fault and c. 10km of slip on the East Hatay Fault have occurred since then. It is inferred that both these faults came into being, and the associated deformation in the Amanos Mountains began, at that time. Prior to that, the northern part of the Africa–Arabia plate boundary was located further east.