Aim The aim of the study was (1) to describe the biodiversity of the sphingid assemblage in a Cerrado area in the Triângulo Mineiro region, south-east of Brazil;(2) to evaluate the seasonal variations in species composition; (3) to compare the faunistic relationships between the Cerrado biome and adjacent ecosystems; and (4) to analyse the biogeographical pattern of species distribution in the Neotropical region in a historical context. Location Panga Ecological Station (PES), 30 km south of the city of Uberlândia, and other areas of the Triângulo Mineiro region, Minas Gerais state, southeastern Brazil.Methods Moth richness and abundance were monitored monthly at the PES . Complementary moth richness and abundance data were also collected in other areas of the Triângulo Mineiro region. All collections were made using light traps, and the hawkmoths were mounted and identified. Cluster analysis, rarefaction curves and estimators of total species richness were used to compare the Cerrado hawkmoth assemblage with assemblages derived from other surveys in the Neotropics. ResultsIn total, 61 hawkmoth species were recorded for the study region and their occurrence was markedly seasonal. The hawkmoth assemblage in the study area presented the closest similarity with rain forest areas and with a tropical dry forest area in Central America. The area shared species with both rain forest and seasonally dry tropical forest (SDTF) ecosystems, including supposedly endemic species previously recorded only in the latter areas. Rarefaction curves and estimators of the total number of species showed species richness to be comparable with other highly diverse forest areas in the Neotropics, such as the Brazilian Amazon and Costa Rica.Main conclusions This short-term study is the first systematic survey of hawkmoths in the Cerrado. It has recorded around 22% of the South American fauna and highlighted the high species richness of the region, which compares favourably with that in other rain forest ecosystems. The survey indicates high regional diversity, and has shown that the Cerrado harbours a hawkmoth fauna comprising both rain forest elements, probably distributed along humid gallery forest corridors, and SDTF elements, supporting the idea of a historical Pleistocene arc connecting the Caatinga domain and other seasonal dry forest areas across the Cerrado region.

Trapping methods can strongly influence the sampling of mammal communities. This study compared the efficiency of the capture of small mammals in Sherman traps in two positions (at ground level and in trees) and pitfall traps in a fragmented landscape. Trapping sessions were carried out between October 2008 and October 2009 at two fragments (8 and 17 ha), an agroforest corridor between them, and the adjacent pasture. A total effort of 4622 trap-nights resulted in 155 captures of 137 individuals from six species. Pitfalls had greater success (4.03%), followed by Shermans on the ground (2.98%) and on trees (2.37%; χ 2 = 6.50, p = 0.04). Five species were caught in Sherman ground traps, four in pitfalls and just two on trees. There was no difference among trap types for marsupials (χ 2 = 4.75; p = 0.09), while for rodents, pitfalls were more efficient than Shermans on the ground (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.02). As a result, the efficiency of each trap type differed among habitats, due to differences in their species composition. Pitfalls were more efficient in the rainy season (Fisher's exact test, p <0.0001) while Shermans on trees were more efficient in the dry season (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.009). There was no difference between seasons for Shermans on the ground (Fisher's exact test, p = 0.76). Considering the results found, we recommend that future studies of forest mammal communities, particularly those designed to test the effects of forest fragmentation, include combinations of different trap types. Um esforço total 4622 armadilhas-noites resultou em 155 capturas de 137 indivíduos de seis espécies. Os pitfalls apresentaram o maior sucesso de captura (4,03%), seguido pelas Shermans no chão (2,98%) e em árvores (2,37%; χ 2 = 6,50, p = 0,04). Cinco espécies foram capturadas em armadilhas Sherman chão, quatro em pitfalls e apenas duas em árvores. Não houve diferença entre os tipos de armadilhas para os marsupiais (χ 2 = 4,75, p = 0,09), enquanto que para os roedores, os pitfalls foram mais eficientes que Shermans chão (teste exato de Fisher, p = 0,02). A eficiência de cada tipo de armadilha diferiu entre os habitats devido à diferenças na composição de espécies em cada área. Pitfalls foram mais eficientes na estação chuvosa (teste exato de Fisher, p <0,0001) enquanto Shermans em árvores foram mais eficientes na estação seca (teste exato de Fisher, p = 0,009). Não houve diferença entre as estações para Shermans no chão (teste exato de Fisher, p = 0,76). Considerando os resultados encontrados, recomenda-se que futuros estudos de comunidades florestais de pequenos mamíferos, particularmente aqueles projetados para testar os efeitos da fragmentação florestal, considerem combinações de diferentes tipos de armadilhas. KeywordsPalavras-chave: armadilhas de queda, armadilhas Sherman, eficiência de captura, marsupiais, roedores.