It has been estimated by the World Health Organization (WHO) that over 71 million people were infected with the hepatitis C virus (HCV) in 2015. Since then, a number of highly effective direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens have been licensed for the treatment of chronic HCV infection: sofosbuvir/daclatasvir, sofosbuvir/ledipasvir, elbasvir/grazoprevir, sofosbuvir/ velpatasvir, glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir. With these treatment regimens, almost all chronic HCV-infected patients, even including prior DAA failures, can be treated effectively and safely. It is therefore likely that further development of DAAs will be limited. In this descriptive review we provide an overview of the clinical pharmacokinetic characteristics of currently available DAAs by describing their absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion. Potential drug-drug interactions with the DAAs are briefly discussed. Furthermore, we summarize what is known about the pharmacodynamics of the DAAs in terms of efficacy and safety. We briefly discuss the relationship between the pharmacokinetics of the DAAs and efficacy or toxicity in special populations, such as hard to cure patients and patients with liver cirrhosis, liver transplantation, renal impairment, hepatitis B virus or HIV co-infection, bleeding disorders, and children. The aim of this overview is to educate/update prescribers and pharmacists so that they are able to safely and effectively treat HCV-infected patients even in the presence of underlying co-infections or co-morbidities.

BackgroundGuidelines advise the use of antibacterials (ABs) in the management of COPD exacerbations. COPD patients often have multiple comorbidities, such as diabetes mellitus and cardiac diseases, leading to polypharmacy. Consequently, drug–drug interactions (DDIs) may frequently occur, and may cause serious adverse events and treatment failure.Objectives(i) To review DDIs related to frequently prescribed ABs among COPD patients from observational and clinical studies. (ii) To improve AB prescribing safety in clinical practice by structuring DDIs according to comorbidities of COPD.MethodsWe conducted a systematic review by searching PubMed and Embase up to 8 February 2018 for clinical trials, cohort and case–control studies reporting DDIs of ABs used for COPD. Study design, subjects, sample size, pharmacological mechanism of DDI and effect of interaction were extracted. We evaluated levels of DDIs and quality of evidence according to established criteria and structured the data by possible comorbidities.ResultsIn all, 318 articles were eligible for review, describing a wide range of drugs used for comorbidities and their potential DDIs with ABs. DDIs between ABs and co-administered drugs could be subdivided into: (i) co-administered drugs altering the pharmacokinetics of ABs; and (ii) ABs interfering with the pharmacokinetics of co-administered drugs. The DDIs could lead to therapeutic failures or toxicities.ConclusionsDDIs related to ABs with clinical significance may involve a wide range of indicated drugs to treat comorbidities in COPD. The evidence presented can support (computer-supported) decision-making by health practitioners when prescribing ABs during COPD exacerbations in the case of co-medication.

No abstract

Objectives To describe itraconazole and hydroxy-itraconazole pharmacokinetics following intravenous (IV) administration of a previously developed nanocrystal formulation (NCF) in haematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) recipients for prophylaxis of invasive fungal disease. Methods In a prospective Phase II study, 10 HCT recipients received itraconazole NCF administered in 2-hour infusions of 200 mg twice daily for 2 days, followed by 200 mg once daily until Day 14. Full pharmacokinetic curves were obtained on Days 7 and 14. Additional samples were collected pre- and post-infusion until Day 6, pre-infusion on Days 10 and 12, and during washout on Days 16, 17, 18, 19 and 28. Itraconazole and hydroxy-itraconazole pharmacokinetics were analysed by non-linear mixed-effects population pharmacokinetic modelling. Results Four-hundred and seventy-one itraconazole and 471 paired hydroxy-itraconazole concentrations from 10 patients were included for analysis. Data were best described by a semi-mechanistic model with central and peripheral itraconazole compartments and a hydroxy-itraconazole compartment with dissolution of itraconazole drug particles from nanocrystals and first-order distribution and elimination. The final model included interindividual variability on itraconazole clearance and hydroxy-itraconazole clearance. Conclusions This study provides information on the pharmacokinetic properties of the itraconazole NCF useful for development of this formulation. Our results suggest that itraconazole NCF is a suitable formulation and may warrant renewal in the setting of repurposing. Our findings may be useful for the reformulation of other highly lipophilic compounds as well.