Background:Informal caregivers of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis experience increased levels of caregiver burden as the disease progresses. Insight in the factors related to caregiver burden is needed in order to develop supportive interventions.Aim:To evaluate the evidence on patient and caregiver factors associated with caregiver burden in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis informal caregivers.Design:A systematic review.Data sources:Four electronic databases were searched up to 2017. Studies that investigated quantitative relations between patient or caregiver factors and caregiver burden were included. The overall quality of evidence for factors was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.Results:A total of 25 articles were included. High quality of evidence was found for the relation between caregiver burden and the factor “behavioral impairments.” Moderate quality of evidence was found for the relations between caregiver burden and the factors “feelings of depression” of the caregiver and “physical functioning” of the patient. The remaining rated caregiver factors—“feelings of anxiety,” “distress,” “social support,” “family functioning,” and “age”—and patient factors—“bulbar function,” “motor function,” “respiratory function,” “disease duration,” “disinhibition,” “executive functioning,” “cognitive functioning,” “feelings of depression,” and “age”—showed low to very low quality of evidence for their association with caregiver burden.Conclusion:Higher caregiver burden is associated with greater behavioral and physical impairment of the patient and with more depressive feelings of the caregiver. This knowledge enables the identification of caregivers at risk for caregiver burden and guides the development of interventions to diminish caregiver burden.

ObjectiveTo systematically identify and appraise evidence on associations between psychological factors (moods, beliefs, personality) and Health-related QoL (HRQoL) and/or global QoL in patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS).MethodsA systematic review was conducted in several online databases (PsycINFO, EMBASE, PubMed and CINAHL) up to October 2015. Articles were included if they reported associations between psychological factors (moods, beliefs and personality) and HRQoL and/or global QoL in an ALS population. The search was limited to empirical studies, published in English, which provided quantitative data. The methodological quality of the included articles was assessed.ResultsIn total, 22 studies were included. Mood was investigated in 14 studies, beliefs in 11 studies and personality in one study. Fifteen different psychological factors were extracted and assessed using 24 different measures. Twelve different QoL measures were used in the selected studies, subdivided into seven different HRQoL measures and five different global QoL measures. Higher levels of anxiety and depression appeared to be related to a poorer HRQoL, whereas a higher level of religiosity seemed to be associated with better global QoL. No conclusive associations were found for confusion-bewilderment (mood), spirituality, mindfulness, coping styles, hopelessness, perception of burden, cognitive appraisal (beliefs), neuroticism, extraversion, openness, agreeableness and conscientiousness (personality), due to insufficient or inconsistent evidence. Religiosity and spirituality appeared to become more positively associated over time.ConclusionsOur results suggest that higher levels of anxiety and depression are related to a poorer HRQoL, whereas higher levels of religiosity appeared to be related to better global QoL. Associations might change during the disease course. This review supports the importance of psychological factors with regard to ALS care. Further research is needed to supplement the available evidence and to investigate how psychological factors can be modified to improve QoL.Review registration numberPROSPERO 2015:CRD42015027303Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12955-016-0507-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Background: Weakness caused by motor neuron degeneration in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) may result in avoidance of physical activity, resulting in deconditioning and reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Objective: To study the effectiveness of aerobic exercise therapy (AET) on disease-specific and generic HRQoL in ambulatory patients with ALS. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, assessor-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Using a biphasic randomization model, ambulatory ALS patients were assigned (1:1) to AET+usual care (UC), or UC. AET consisted of a 16-week aerobic cycling exercise program. Primary outcome measures were the 40-item ALS assessment questionnaire (ALSAQ-40), and the mental component summary (MCS) and physical component summary (PCS) scores of the short-form survey (SF-36), using linear mixed effects models. Per-protocol (PP) analysis was performed for those patients who attended ≥75% of the training sessions; controls were matched (1:1) by propensity score matching. Results: Of 325 screened patients, 57 were randomized: 27 to AET+UC and 30 to UC. No significant mean slope differences between groups were observed for ALSAQ-40 (-1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]-2.6 to 0.5, P=0.172) nor for SF-36 MCS (0.24;-0.7 to 1.1, P=0.576) or PCS (-0.51;-1.4 to 0.38, P=0.263). There were no adverse events related to the AET. PP-analyses showed significantly less deterioration in ALSAQ-40 (-1.88,-3.8 to 0.0, P=0.046) in AET+UC compared to UC. Conclusions: AET+UC was not superior to UC alone in preserving HRQoL in ambulatory ALS patient. However, the study was unfortunately underpowered, because only 10 patients completed the protocol. AET+UC may preserve disease-specific HRQoL in slow progressors. Clinical trial registration number: Netherlands National Trial Register (NTR): 1616.

Our objective was to compare the effects of cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) and usual care (UC) on quality of life (QoL) in psychologically distressed patients with ALS and their caregivers. We conducted a multicentre randomized controlled trial (RCT). In 16 weeks, patient-carer pairs received five to 10 CBT sessions plus usual care (UC) or UC alone. Outcome measures were SF-36 Mental Component Summary (MCS), ALSAQ-40 Emotional Functioning (EF), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and Caregiver Strain Index (CSI). Assessments took place at baseline, four, seven and 10 months. The steering committee decided to stop the trial prematurely and analyse the data due to: 1) slow recruitment (15 patients over 42 months); and 2) the low demand for joint patient-carer CBT sessions. Caregivers, however, expressed an unanticipated demand for individual psychological support. Patients' ALSAQ-40-EF and caregivers' SF-36-MCS were significantly better in CBT than UC (p < 0.05). CSI was significantly lower in the CBT than the UC (p < 0.05). In conclusion, CBT might be beneficial to patients and caregivers. The stringent eligibility criteria limited participation rate and consequently the generalizability of results. Future studies should further examine the impact of CBT interventions for patients with ALS and their caregivers.

Objectives: To assess psychological distress levels over time in caregivers of patients in the early stage of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and to investigate the association between caregivers' coping styles and psychological distress over time. Methods: Fifty-four caregivers were followed in a RCT of patients in the early stage of ALS. Questionnaires were administered at baseline, 4, 7, and 10 months. Psychological distress was assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and task-, emotion-, and avoidance-oriented coping styles were identified with the short version of the Coping Inventory for Stressful Situations (CISS-21). Analyses were performed using linear mixed models. Results: Caregivers' psychological distress increased by 0.24 points on the HADS per month (p ¼ 0.01). An emotion-oriented coping style was positively associated with psychological distress in caregivers (b ¼ 0.90, p < 0.01), but did not influence the development of psychological distress over time. The avoidance-oriented coping style and the task-oriented coping style were not significantly related to psychological distress. Conclusion: Feelings of distress increase in ALS caregivers during the course of the disease of the patient. Emotion-oriented coping is related to psychological distress; however, emotional coping and distress might represent overlapping constructs. Focusing on one coping style in the care for ALS caregivers may be too simplistic for the complex situations they face, as it ignores the fact that people may require different coping strategies in different situations.

BackgroundAmyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is a fatal progressive neurodegenerative disorder affecting motor neurons in the spinal cord, brainstem and motor cortex, leading to muscle weakness. Muscle weakness may result in the avoidance of physical activity, which exacerbates disuse weakness and cardiovascular deconditioning. The impact of the grave prognosis may result in depressive symptoms and hopelessness. Since there is no cure for ALS, optimal treatment is based on symptom management and preservation of quality of life (QoL), provided in a multidisciplinary setting. Two distinctly different therapeutic interventions may be effective to improve or preserve daily functioning and QoL at the highest achievable level: aerobic exercise therapy (AET) to maintain or enhance functional capacity and cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) to improve coping style and cognitions in patients with ALS. However, evidence to support either approach is still insufficient, and the underlying mechanisms of the approaches remain poorly understood. The primary aim of the FACTS-2-ALS trial is to study the effects of AET and CBT, in addition to usual care, compared to usual care alone, on functioning and QoL in patients with ALS.Methods / DesignA multicentre, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial with a postponed information model will be conducted. A sample of 120 patients with ALS (1 month post diagnosis) will be recruited from 3 university hospitals and 1 rehabilitation centre. Patients will be randomized to one of three groups i.e. (1) AET + usual care, (2) CBT + usual care, (3) Usual care. AET consists of a 16-week aerobic exercise programme, on 3 days a week. CBT consists of individual psychological support of patients in 5 to 10 sessions over a 16-week period. QoL, functioning and secondary outcome measures will be assessed at baseline, immediately post intervention and at 3- and 6-months follow-up.DiscussionThe FACTS-2-ALS study is the first theory-based randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effects, and the maintenance of effects, of AET and CBT on functioning and QoL in patients with ALS. The results of this study are expected to generate new evidence for the effect of multidisciplinary care of persons with ALS.Trial registrationDutch Trial Register NTR1616.

Ambulatory ALS patients have participation restrictions, which may be influenced if early ALS care is directed toward lung capacity, functional mobility, fatigue, and feelings of helplessness. Muscle Nerve 56: 912-918, 2017.

The SMC tests showed moderate (Boyd and Graham SMC test) to good (modified Trost SMC test) inter-rater reliability.