As part of a broader investigation into the training needs of rural doctors, the reasoning behind decisions of graduates to enter rural practice in North Queensland was explored. North Queensland is a growing and diverse region that is home to 500 000 people but has had no local production of medical graduates. While prior rural exposure was found to be a powerful influence on the decision of some, a small number of those interviewed entered rural practice almost by chance, liked it and stayed. Should this finding be confirmed in more formal investigation, workforce planners would need to continue initiatives to recruit graduates who have no prior connection to rural life.
Objective To identify requirements for vocational training and continuing education programs in rural general practice. Design A questionnaire was sent to all 487 rural doctors and 140 metropolitan and 140 provincial city general practitioners (GPs) in Queensland. A sample of medical educators, health professional and consumer representatives and rural doctors was also interviewed. Res‐ponses were compared by geographical area, practice characteristics and level of postgraduate training. Results There are significant differences between rural and urban practice profiles. Rural doctors have to practise a range of clinical skills in an environment with restricted access to health professional support, although the need for advanced training in procedural or other skills depends on the type of rural practice. Rural and urban doctors want more influence in determining continuing medical education (CME) programs. Interactive learning methods were rated as the most effective education methods by both rural and urban GPs. Rural doctors were less likely to consider that they spent enough time on CME. Conclusion Vocational training programs should accommodate various rural career objectives, including those requiring advanced levels of procedural work. There is a significant unmet demand for CME tailored to the needs of individual doctors, both rural and urban, but distance and isolation may make this more critical in rural practice. These issues need to be addressed as training opportunities can contribute to improved retention of the rural medical workforce.
Rural general practitioners (GPs) are currently involved in two concurrent and systematic programs of research/evaluation. These programs are generated, respectively, by initiatives in rural health and in general practice. This paper examines the consequences of this involvement by GPs as implementers and/or targets of components of each of these programs, and concludes that it is appropriate that they be provided in a systematic way with the knowledge and skills base they need to empower them to participate in (both developmentally and at the implementation level) and/or to appraise the research impinging on their lives. Six broad levels of involvement in rural health research are identified for rural doctors in this paper, which proposes an innovative strategy--health research literary--to assist doctors at these various levels of involvement.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.