No abstract

In patients who are receiving mechanical ventilation, daily interruption of sedative-drug infusions decreases the duration of mechanical ventilation and the length of stay in the intensive care unit.

No abstract

No abstract

Critically ill patients often receive sedatives, which may delay liberation from mechanical ventilation and intensive care unit discharge. Daily interruption of sedatives alleviates these problems, but the impact of this practice on long-term psychological outcomes is unknown. We compared psychological outcomes of intensive care unit patients undergoing daily sedative interruption (intervention) with those without this protocol (control). Assessments using (1) the Revised Impact of Event Scale (evaluates signs of posttraumatic stress disorder [PTSD]), (2) the Medical Outcomes Study 36 item short-form health survey, (3) the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, (4) the Beck Depression Inventory-2, (5) and the Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness score (overall quality of adjustment to current or residual effects of illness) were done by blinded observers. The intervention group had a better total Impact of Events score (11.2 vs. 27.3, p=0.02), a trend toward a lower incidence of PTSD (0% vs. 32%, p=0.06), and a trend toward a better total Psychosocial Adjustment to Illness score (46.8 vs. 54.3, p=0.08). We conclude that daily sedative interruption does not result in adverse psychological outcomes, reduces symptoms of PTSD, and may be associated with reductions in posttraumatic stress disorder.

Early physical and occupational therapy is feasible from the onset of mechanical ventilation despite high illness acuity and presence of life support devices. Adverse events are uncommon, even in this high-risk group.

Oxygen consumption dedicated to respiratory work (V O(2RESP)) during quiet breathing is small in normal patients. In the morbidly obese, at high minute ventilations, VO(2RESP) is greater than in normal patients, but VO(2RESP) during quiet breathing in these patients is not known. We postulated that such patients have increased VO(2RESP) at rest which may predispose them to respiratory failure when additional respiratory workloads are imposed. We measured baseline VO(2) in morbidly obese patients immediately prior to gastric bypass surgery and again after intubation, mechanical ventilation, and paralysis, and compared their change in VO(2) to nonobese patients scheduled for elective abdominal surgery. Baseline VO(2) was higher in the obese patients compared with control patients (354.6 versus 221.4 ml/min; p = 0.0001) and the change in VO(2) from spontaneous breathing to mechanical ventilation was significant in the obese patients (354.6 versus 297.2 ml/min; p = 0.0002) but not the control patients (221.4 versus 219.8 ml/min; p = 0.86). We conclude that morbidly obese patients dedicate a disproportionately high percentage of total VO(2) to conduct respiratory work, even during quiet breathing. This relative inefficiency suggests a decreased ventilatory reserve and a predisposition to respiratory failure in the setting of even mild pulmonary or systemic insults.

Daily interruption of sedative infusions in critically ill patients undergoing mechanical ventilation reduces intensive care unit length of stay and, in turn, decreases the incidence of complications of critical illness associated with prolonged intubation and mechanical ventilation.