The use of closed suction drainage and a high postoperative INR were associated with the development of SSI following TKA. Avoiding the use of surgical drains and careful monitoring of anticoagulant prophylaxis in patients undergoing TKA should reduce the risk of infection.

ObjectiveTo better understand barriers and facilitators that contribute to antibiotic overuse in long-term care and to use this information to inform an evidence and theory-informed program.MethodsInformation on barriers and facilitators associated with the assessment and management of urinary tract infections were identified from a mixed-methods survey and from focus groups with stakeholders working in long-term care. Each barrier or facilitator was mapped to corresponding determinants of behavior change, as described by the theoretical domains framework (TDF). The Rx for Change database was used to identify strategies to address the key determinants of behavior change.ResultsIn total, 19 distinct barriers and facilitators were mapped to 8 domains from the TDF: knowledge, skills, environmental context and resources, professional role or identity, beliefs about consequences, social influences, emotions, and reinforcements. The assessment of barriers and facilitators informed the need for a multifaceted approach with the inclusion of strategies (1) to establish buy-in for the changes; (2) to align organizational policies and procedures; (3) to provide education and ongoing coaching support to staff; (4) to provide information and education to residents and families; (5) to establish process surveillance with feedback to staff; and (6) to deliver reminders.ConclusionsThe use of a stepped approach was valuable to ensure that locally relevant barriers and facilitators to practice change were addressed in the development of a regional program to help long-term care facilities minimize antibiotic prescribing for asymptomatic bacteriuria. This stepped approach provides considerable opportunity to advance the design and impact of antimicrobial stewardship programs.

No abstract

Background Acute limb ischemia represents a clinical emergency with eventual limb loss and life-threatening consequences. It is characterized by a sudden decrease in limb perfusion. Acute ischemia is defined as a duration of symptoms for less than 14 days. Aging of the population increases the prevalence of acute limb ischemia. The two principal etiologies are arterial embolism and in situ thrombosis of an atherosclerotic artery. Immediate diagnosis, accurate assessment and urgent intervention when needed are crucial to save the limb and to prevent a major amputation. Delay in diagnosis and therapy may lead to irreversible ischemic damage. Method To assess the current treatment options in acute limb ischemia, this review is based on a selective literature search in PubMed representing the current state of research. Results and Conclusion Patients with acute limb ischemia should receive immediate anticoagulation. Treatment depends on the classification based on the degree of ischemia and limb viability. Especially acute (< 14 days symptom duration) Rutherford Categories IIa and IIb with marginally and immediately threatened limbs require definitive therapeutic intervention and are salvageable, if promptly revascularized. The current literature suggests that open surgical revascularization is more time effective then catheter-directed thrombolysis. However, with the advent of thrombolytic delivery systems and mechanical thrombectomy devices, treatment time can be minimized and successful utilization in patients with Category IIb (Rutherford Classification for Acute Limb Ischemia) has been reported with promising limb-salvage and survival rates. Large randomized studies are still missing, and guidelines suggest choosing the method of revascularization depending on anatomic location, etiology, and local practice patterns, with the time to restore the blood flow being an important factor to consider. Key points:  Citation Format

Background Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding is a frequently occurring disease pattern, with a broad variety of possible causes. The most acute bleeding responds well to conservative, medicinal and endoscopic therapies. Nevertheless, a certain amount of endoscopically not-identifiable or controllable non-varicose GI-bleeding requires alternative, sometimes surgical, therapy concepts. The updated S2k guideline “gastrointestinal bleeding” makes the case for interventional radiology with its minimally invasive endovascular techniques. Methods This review article discusses the role of interventional radiology in the therapy of non-variceal upper and lower gastrointestinal bleeding according to the current literature and updated guideline. In this regard it covers the indications, techniques, results and complications of endovascular therapy. Results and conclusion Considering interdisciplinary therapy options, the guideline-oriented endovascular treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding, using embolization and implantion of covered stents, shows to be a reasonable option with good technical and clinical success rates and a low rate of complications. In this context solid knowledge of vascular anatomy is essential to acquire adequate hemostasis. Key points:  Citation Format

Summary: Background: Arterioureteral fistulas (AUFs) are severe pathologies of different origin and with increasing incidence frequently appear in patients with underlying extensive malignancy and after pelvic surgery. AUF therapy is challenging since symptoms are frequently non-specific and patients are often unsuitable surgical candidates due to comorbidities. Since experiences with endovascular treatment strategies are limited, the feasibility, effectiveness, and safety were evaluated in a consecutive case series. Patients and methods: A retrospective analysis of five patients with endovascular AUF exclusion was performed. Probable predisposing factors for an AUF included history of pelvic malignancy with oncologic surgery in four patients, radiotherapy in four patients, and indwelling ureteral stents in four patients. Clinical presentation, diagnostic management, and site of fistula were assessed. Furthermore, technical and clinical success as well as complications were evaluated. Results: All patients presented with gross haematuria. In four patients, haematuria occurred during endoscopic ureteral stent manipulation. Affected vessels were the internal pudendal artery in one, intrarenal segmental artery and external iliac artery in two, and internal iliac artery in another two patients. Treatment included coil embolisation (n = 2), plug embolisation (n = 3), particulate embolisation (n = 1), and covered stent implantation (n = 2). Technical success was achieved in all procedures. In two cases, re-intervention was necessary due to AUF recurrence, resulting in a clinical success rate of 60.0%. One major complication class D was documented. Conclusions: AUFs can be treated effectively and safely using endovascular techniques. Diagnostic and therapeutic management of this rare entity requires a high level of awareness for potential risk factors as well as an optimal multidisciplinary coordination.

No abstract

No abstract