Macrophages have been proposed as the major effector cell in T cell-mediated xenograft rejection. To determine their role in this response, NOD-SCID mice were transplanted with fetal pig pancreas (FPP) before reconstitution with CD4+ T cells from BALB/c mice. Twelve days after CD4+ T cell reconstitution, purified macrophages (depleted of T cells) were isolated from CD4+ T cell-reconstituted FPP recipient mice and adoptively transferred to their nonreconstituted counterparts. After adoptive macrophage transfer, FPP recipient mice transferred with macrophages from CD4+ T cell-reconstituted mice demonstrated xenograft destruction along with massive macrophage infiltration at day 4 and complete graft destruction at day 8 postmacrophage transfer. By contrast, FPP recipients that received macrophages from nonreconstituted mice showed intact FPP xenografts with few infiltrating macrophages at both days 4 and 8 after macrophage transfer. The graft-infiltrating macrophages showed increased expression of their activation markers. Depletion of endogenous macrophages or any remaining CD4+ T cells did not delay graft rejection in the macrophage-transferred FPP recipients, whereas depletion of transferred macrophages with clodronate liposomes prevented graft rejection. Our results show that macrophages primed by FPP and activated by CD4+ T cells were attracted from the peripheral circulation and were capable of specific targeting and destruction of FPP xenografts. This suggests that in xenograft rejection, there are macrophage-specific recognition and targeting signals that are independent of those received by T cells.

Combined costimulatory blockade was capable of producing tolerance to pancreatic islet xenografts. The induction of this tolerant state was associated with increased T cell apoptosis, whereas the maintenance phase of tolerance was associated with the accumulation of a large number of inactive lymphocytes within the graft.

No abstract

IL-10/Fc prolonged rat pancreatic islet xenograft survival by inhibiting macrophage mediated immune responses. The effectiveness of this agent when administered pretransplant suggests it may have a role as an induction agent with potential clinical application.

The mouse used different mechanisms to reject the rat and canine islets, suggesting that the immune response in islet xenograft rejection may be dependent on the species combination. It may not be possible to characterize the cellular xenograft rejection response in a bipolar manner as has been the case with humoral rejection response. Caution therefore needs to be taken before extrapolating the cellular immune responses seen in animal models to the clinical setting.

The results suggest that the level of alphaGal expression plays an important role in graft survival. Therefore, its removal is important in the development of a pig islet donor for future clinical therapy.

Local administration of CTLA4-fusion protein with mutated (non-functional) immunoglobulin domains or systemic administration of anti-CD28 monoclonal antibody can prolong corneal allograft survival in the rat.

Inhibition of the passive cell death pathway in T cells did not block tolerance induction, suggesting that the mechanism by which apoptosis regulates the alloimmune response is more complex than first thought.