Bruce Mazlish writes that "[t]he reviewer must be conscious of his or her limitations. A certain humility is called for, when one realizes that one is being judged as much as judging." 1 It is indeed a humbling experience to read Anne Clifford's Introducing Feminist Theology, no less to write about it. For with the ease of a superb pedagogue and the erudition of a true scholar, Clifford brings a voluminous amount of material to heel with consistency, coherence, and clarity. Clifford identifies her target audience as "upper-level undergraduates and beginning graduate" students, both women and men. Along with students, however, teachers, researchers, and interested lay readers will reap the benefits of Clifford's work. The reader is treated to a guided tour of the feminist theologian's primary tasks of criticism, recovery and reconstruction. In short, Introducing Feminist Theology, is a tour de force of method in action while offering an almost encyclopedic well of responses and examples to the "whys," "whats," and "wherefores" of Christian feminist theology. Clifford's task, as she notes, is "to fill the gap" that exists between the plentiful specialized works in Christian feminist theology and spirituality and the need for a text that does not lose the forest for the trees, a text that introduces feminist theological history, theory, and method. Both the introduction and the epilogue clearly distinguish between feminist theology as an academic discipline and feminism as a social vision and advocacy movement. While choosing the history of Christian feminist theology as the book's organizing theme, Clifford skillfully weaves together that thematic academic trajectory along with feminism as a social and political movement, albeit the latter in broad strokes. The result is a text that successfully and persuasively introduces the reader to the rich perspectives and possibilities of Christian feminist theological thought. The success and persuasiveness of Introducing Feminist Theology is due in large part to the organizational choices that Clifford makes.
No abstract
Science and Wisdom is a collection of twelve essays written over a span of forty years. Arranged in a three-part structure (introductory essays, "Theology and Cosmology," and "The Wisdom of the Sciences"), some appeared previously in journals and in collections edited by others. Three are lectures published for the first time. In the preface Moltmann provides the reader with a rationale for the collection. Drawing attention to the neglect of science by [Protestant] theologians, attributable at least in part to Karl Barth's infamous "no" to natural theology in 1934 (xi), Moltmann argues that this "no" must be set aside in our current situation of worldwide ecological crisis. Although the collection does not have a central thesis, it does have a stated purpose, which is to bring Christian faith to understanding in ways compatible with findings of the sciences (xii). While this may be Moltmann's overriding desire, those accustomed to reading the theology-science monographs and essays written by North American (e.g., Ian Barbour) and British (e.g., Arthur Peacocke) scholars will likely be struck by how little specific scientific theories and findings are addressed in the essays. Nevertheless, there are many good reasons for giving this collection consideration. I draw your attention to three of them. The tenth essay, from which the collection gets its name contrasts the pattern of destruction made possible by modern science with the God-created wisdom structure of the world (141-57). Moltmann argues that this wisdom structure and the wonder it evokes provide the pre-rational basis for scientific reason and ethical responsibility. To end the destruction scientists must incorporate ethical wisdom in their research in order to integrate human civilizations into the geosystems of the earth. The fourth essay is worthy of note for the contribution it makes to creation theology from the standpoint of kenosis. Finding early and nineteenth century Lutheran kenotic theology wanting, he builds on Jewish Shekinah theology, concluding that, in creating, God self-limits God's own infinity and omnipresence to provide a space for finite, contingent creation. The kenotic God acts by giving creatures space to unfold, time to develop and power for their own movement (65). Eschatology is also given attention in several essays. The most sustained treatment is found in the fifth one in which Moltmann provides helpful appraisals of the Lutheran (annihilatio mundi), the Roman Catholic (transformatio mundi) and the Eastern Orthodox (deificatio mundi), exploring how these theological eschatologies do or do not relate to the astrophysical scenarios of cosmological eschatology (75-84). While I would not require this book for an undergraduate or graduate Theology and Science course, I do recommend its purchase for a college or university library and would likely refer students to the essays highlighted above and others in the collection.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.