Abstract:We have shown previously that noradrenaline (NA) stimulated or inhibited the release of corticotropinreleasing hormone (CRH) according to the availability of adrenal steroids. The aim of the present work was to examine whether the changes in the NA modulation of CRH release from hypothalamic neurons result from a steroid-induced plasticity of the adrenergic transduction pathways. From anterior hypothalamic slices cultured in standard medium (i.e., containing adrenal steroids at a final dilution of 61 ±9 ng/ml), (a) the stimulatory effect of NA on CRH release was reversed in a dose-dependent manner by increasing concentrations of the a1-adrenoreceptor antagonist prazosin, (b) activation of protein kinase C by acute treatment with phorbol 1 2-myristate 13-acetate (0.5 tiM, 1 h) mimicked NA stimulation of CRH secretion, and (c) the activation of L-type Ca 2 channels by Bay K 8644 also produce an increased CRH secretion. In contrast, the inhibitory effect of NA on CRH secretion from slices cultured in steroid-free medium was markedly reversed by the a 2-adrenoreceptor antagonist yohimbine, by pretreatment with pertussin toxin, or by the addition of 4-aminopyridine, a K~-channel blocker. Acute treatment with phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate did not change the inhibitory NA effect. Moreover, all these effects were reversed by daily corticosterone supplementation, for as long as they were tested. These results are consistent with asteroid-dependent change in the nature of adrenergic receptors and its associated transduction pathways involved in the regulation of CRH secretion in. the hypothalamus. Key Words: Corticotropin-releasing hormone neurons-Organotypic cultures-Neuronal plasticitya1-versus a2-adrenergic receptor ratio.
TCP and its derivative gacyclidine (+/- GK11) are high-affinity non-competitive antagonists of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors (NMDARs) and as such exhibit significant neuroprotective properties. These compounds also bind with a low affinity to binding sites whose pharmacological profiles are different from that of NMDARs. With the intention to develop new strategies of neuroprotection, we found it mandatory to investigate whether 1-[1-(2-thienyl)cyclohexyl]piperidine (TCP) and gacyclidine low-affinity sites are similar. The effects of several drugs selective for either NMDARs or the [(3)H]TCP low-affinity site (or PCP(3) site) on (+), (-)[(3)H]GK11 and [(3)H]TCP specific binding were investigated. Competition experiments on cerebellum homogenates revealed substantial differences between the pharmacological profiles of the PCP(3) site and that of gacyclidine's enantiomers low-affinity sites. Under experimental conditions preventing the interaction of the radioligands with NMDARs, the autoradiographic study showed, however, that the distributions of both [(3)H]TCP and (-)[(3)H]GK11 specific binding were similar. The specific labelling was low and uniform in telencephalic structures, whereas in the cerebellum it was higher in the molecular than in the granular layer. Finally, the analysis of competition experiments performed on tissues slices demonstrated that PCP(3) selective ligands were unable to prevent [(3)H]TCP or (-)[(3)H]GK11 binding to "non-NMDA" binding sites. As a whole, our data suggest that: (1) the different pharmacological profiles of [(3)H]TCP and [(3)H]gacyclidine enantiomers on low-affinity sites are due to their selectivity for specific NMDARs subpopulations; (2) the pharmacological isolation of TCP and gacyclidine "non-NMDA" binding sites is the most appropriate way to further study the low-affinity component of their specific binding. Obtaining reliable and specific pharmacological tools for those binding sites is of particular interest, since it is likely that they play a substantial role in the low neurotoxicity, and therefore tolerability, of gacyclidine, a new neuroprotective drug currently evaluated in clinical trials for the treatment of brain and spinal cord injuries.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.