The relevance of visual and olfactory cues for host‐plant location is investigated in males and females of the oligophagous mustard leaf beetle Phaedon cochleariae Fabricius (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Different objects are offered in a walking arena and the behaviour of beetles is observed. Beetles orient toward vertically or horizontally striped black and white pattern independent of stripe orientation. The results suggest that contrast facilitates orientation in the field, whereas the pattern itself may be less important for host location in dense vegetation. The response to green and yellow objects is tested to investigate discrimination abilities between young (green) and mature (yellow) leaves. Beetles prefer green over yellow independent of material (cardboard or leaves of Nasturtium officinale R. Br., Brassicaceae). Preference behaviour tested in a dual‐choice contact assay coincides with visual preferences, where adults prefer young, more nutritious leaves for feeding and oviposition. Furthermore, females discriminate between visual cues of green leaves and green cardboard, whereas males do not, indicating that females are more sensitive in colour discrimination. Differences in colour wavelength influence the choice of beetle behaviour more strongly than differences in intensity. Both sexes of P. cochleariae prefer volatiles of the host plant N. officinale, whereas only females respond to the main volatile compound 2‐phenylethyl isothiocyanate. Given a choice between visual and olfactory cues, males orientate towards the colour cues, whereas females do not show any preferences. In males, visual cues may thus override olfactory cues, whereas, in females, both are equally important, which may reflect different ecological requirements and/or physiological abilities.

No abstract

The mustard leaf beetle, Phaedon cochleariae (F.) (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), is specialized to feed and develop on various species within the Brassicaceae. In this study, we investigated the acceptance of several host plant species (Brassica rapa L. and Sinapis alba L.), commonly used by the beetle (familiar plants), and of various unfamiliar plants, including systematically and chemically related [Bunias orientalis L. (Brassicaceae) and Tropaeolum majus L. (Tropaeolaceae), both Brassicales], as well as unrelated non‐host plant species [Plantago lanceolata L. (Plantaginaceae); Lamiales]. Emphasis was laid on the acceptance of the neophyte B. orientalis, and on underlying cues responsible for the acceptance of the various species. Behavioural responses to plant volatiles were studied using a static four‐chamber olfactometer. Stimulants and deterrents were investigated by bioassay‐guided solid phase extraction and semi‐preparative high performance liquid chromatography. A difference in acceptance of plant species was found: odours and polar compounds of all Brassicales evoked attraction and feeding stimulation, respectively, in Ph. cochleariae. Glucosinolates and their volatile hydrolysis products could be the main compounds that are involved in attraction of the beetles. In contrast, Ph. cochleariae did not respond to odours of the non‐host P. lanceolata, and some fractions of this plant had feeding‐deterrent effects, due to the presence of iridoid glycosides, among others. Although adult females accepted the neophyte B. orientalis for oviposition, neonate larvae did not survive on it. The flavonoid‐containing fraction of this plant was deterrent, whereas a similar fraction had been shown to cause some feeding stimulation when derived from S. alba. Differences in qualitative and quantitative composition of related metabolites lead to differentiated plant acceptance, proving the complexity of plant cues and of insect responses that determine host acceptance behaviour. The possibility of a diet breadth enlargement to B. orientalis and the role of Ph. cochleariae as a putative native biocontrol agent of this invasive plant are discussed.

No abstract