Brief myocardial ischemia not only evokes a local cardioprotective or "preconditioning" effect but also can render remote myocardium resistant to sustained ischemia. We propose the following hypotheses: remote protection is initiated by a humoral trigger; brief ischemia-reperfusion will result in release of the humoral trigger (possibly adenosine and/or norepinephrine) into the coronary effluent; and transfer of this effluent to a virgin acceptor heart will elicit cardioprotection. To test these concepts, effluent was collected during normal perfusion from donor-control hearts and during preconditioning ischemia-reperfusion from donor-preconditioned (PC) hearts. After reoxygenation occurred and aliquots for measurement of adenosine and norepinephrine content were harvested, effluent was transfused to acceptor-control and acceptor-PC hearts. All hearts then underwent 40 min of global ischemia and 60 min of reperfusion, and infarct size was delineated by tetrazolium staining. Mean infarct size was smaller in both donor- and acceptor-PC groups (9% of left ventricle) than in donor- and acceptor-control groups (36% and 34%; P < 0.01). Protection in acceptor-PC hearts could not, however, be attributed to adenosine or norepinephrine. Thus preconditioning-induced cardioprotection can be transferred between rabbit hearts by transfusion of coronary effluent. Although adenosine and norepinephrine are apparently not responsible, these results suggest that remote protection is initiated by a humoral mechanism.
Recent evidence revealed biphasic alterations in myocardial concentrations of the second messenger inositol (1,4,5)-trisphosphate [Ins(1,4,5)P3] with ischemic preconditioning (PC), i.e., increase during brief PC ischemia and decrease early during sustained test occlusion. Our aim was to determine whether an agonist and an antagonist of Ins(1,4,5)P(3) signaling (D-myo-inositol-1,4,5-trisphosphate hexasodium salt [D-myo-Ins(1,4, 5)P3] and 2-aminoethoxydiphenyl borate (2-APB), respectively), given such that they mimic this biphasic profile, would mimic infarct size reduction with PC. To test this concept, isolated, buffer-perfused rabbit hearts received no intervention (control), ischemic PC, D-myo-Ins(1,4,5)P3, D-myo-Ins(1,4,5)P(3) + PC, 2-APB, or 2-APB + PC. All hearts then underwent 30-min coronary occlusion and 2 h reflow, and infarct size was delineated by tetrazolium staining. In addition, the effects of D-myo-Ins(1,4,5)P3 and 2-APB on Ins(1,4,5)P3 signaling were evaluated in isolated fura 2-loaded rat cardiomyocytes. Mean infarct size was reduced with PC and in all D-myo-Ins(1,4,5)P3- and 2-APB-treated groups versus control (59 and 42-55%, respectively, vs. 80% of myocardium at risk, P < 0.05). Thus pharmacological manipulation of Ins(1,4,5)P3 signaling mimics the cardioprotection achieved with ischemic PC in rabbit heart.
We sought to determine whether stretch-induced preconditioning may be related to activation of adenosine receptors, ATP-sensitive K+([Formula: see text]) channels, and/or protein kinase C (PKC) in the rabbit heart. Anesthetized rabbits underwent 30 min of coronary artery occlusion followed by 3 h of reperfusion. Ischemic preconditioning was induced by one episode of 5 min of ischemia followed by 5 min of reperfusion, and stretch preconditioning was induced by a transient volume overload. The abilities of gadolinium (Gd3+), a blocker of stretch-activated channels, glibenclamide (Glib), a blocker of [Formula: see text] channels, 8-( p-sulfophenyl)-theophylline (8-SPT), a blocker of adenosine receptors, and polymyxin B (PMXB), an antagonist of PKC, to prevent the infarct size-limiting effect of stretch-induced preconditioning were evaluated. Because the infarct size-reducing effect of stretch occurred in the absence of ischemia and was prevented by previous administration of Gd3+, Glib, 8-SPT, and PMXB, we propose that activation of mechanosensitive ion channels protects the rabbit heart from subsequent sustained ischemic insult, likely through a mechanism that involves downstream activation of PKC, adenosine receptors, and/or [Formula: see text] channels.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.