Concurrent BCL2 and MYC translocations, so called double hit (DH), are a rare finding in large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Based on data from retrospective series, DH has been correlated with aggressive clinical behaviour and poor outcome. We conducted a consecutive study of DH incidence and correlation with pathologic and clinical characteristics, including response to Rituximab-containing chemotherapy and survival, in an unselected cohort of patients with LBCL. Translocations involving BCL2 and MYC loci were examined with fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) in 157 patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) or B-cell lymphoma, unclassifiable, with features intermediate between diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and Burkitt lymphoma (BCLU). The incidence of DH was 11% in the total cohort, 7% of primary LBCL and 21% of transformed LBCL. DH lymphomas were all GCB immunophenotype and were more often BCLU. No clinical characteristics were correlated with the presence of DH, which also had no impact on overall response rate (ORR), relapse rate or overall survival (OS). However, sub-stratification of DH lymphomas by FISH indicated a possible inferior survival related to immunoglobulin MYC translocation partner gene. Screening of patients with BCLU and DLBCL of GCB type for DH BCL2/MYC translocation including MYC translocation partner gene may provide important prognostic information.

In large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) MYC- and MYC/BCL2 double-hit (DH) translocations have been associated with inferior survival. We hypothesised that the negative prognostic impact of MYC translocation was determined by an immunoglobulin MYC translocation partner gene (IG-MYC), as opposed to a non-immunoglobulin partner gene (nonIG-MYC). In a prospective, unselected cohort of 237 LBCL patients MYC and BCL2 translocations were identified by fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH) with split probes. MYC translocation partner gene was identified by IGH/MYC fusion probes and/or kappa/lambda split probes. Clinical data were collected from patient files. MYC translocation was identified in 28/225 patients. IG-MYC translocation partner gene was identified in 12/24 patients. DH translocation was identified in 23/228 patients. IG-MYC translocation partner gene was identified in 9/19 DH patients. Neither MYC-nor DH translocation showed correlation with survival. However, MYC translocation with IG-MYC translocation partner gene was associated with worse OS compared with both MYC translocation with nonIG-MYC translocation partner gene (P = 0.02) as well as absence of MYC translocation (P = 0.03). In patients with DH a similar, however, stronger correlation was seen (P = 0.003 and P = 0.0004 respectively). MYC - or DH translocation with nonIG-MYC translocation partner gene was not associated with worse overall survival (P = 0.2 and P = 0.3 respectively). Most patients received Rituximab (86%) and CHOP/CHOP-like chemotherapy regimes (81%). We suggest that prognostic stratification of LBCL patients by MYC and/or DH translocations should include identification of MYC translocation partner gene because approximately half of the cases harbour nonIG-MYC translocation partner genes with no or minor influence on survival.

A panel of antibodies against keratins, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), epithelial antigen (Ber-EP4), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), tumour-associated glycoprotein (B72.3), vimentin and LeuM1 was applied to sections of adenocarcinoma of the lung and malignant mesothelioma in a randomized design. The proportion of stained tumour cells within each section was estimated independently in five categories by three pathologists (no positive tumour cells, 1-10%, 11-33%, 34-66% and more than 67% positive tumour cells). The kappa values representing the chance corrected interobserver agreement for the different antibodies in such a five group assessment were between 0.38 and 0.72. In two group assessment the kappa values were between 0.53 and 0.94. Nosological sensitivity and nosological specificity were calculated for all antibodies, and diagnostic sensitivity and diagnostic specificity (predictive values) were calculated for the Ber-EP4, CEA, B72.3, LeuM1 and vimentin. The difference between nosological sensitivity and nosologic specificity and the clinically relevant predictive values of positive and negative tests were demonstrated. In respect of the reproducibility and the diagnostic power defined by the predictive values, we demonstrated that a panel of antibodies, including CEA, Ber-EP4 and B72.3 and, to a lesser degree, LeuM1 and vimentin is applicable for the histopathological distinction between adenocarcinoma of the lung and malignant mesotheliomas. Before introduction of new diagnostic tests, including new antibodies, the prevalence of the tested tumours should be estimated. Nosological sensitivity and nosological specificity should be converted to predictive values.