Background: The aim of this prospective, randomized study was to determine if health related quality of life is affected by the choice of surgical strategy in the management of acute cholecystitis. Material and Methods: After diagnostic workup, patients were randomized to one of two groups: (1) early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (i.e. within 7 days after onset of symptoms) or (2) initial conservative treatment followed by delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Seventy-four patients entered the early operation group and 71 patients were assigned to the delayed operation strategy. Assessments of quality of life were made at 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery, and in the delayed operation group also one month after the initial conservative treatment. Results: The gastrointestinal symptom scores were significantly better in three dimensions (diarrhea, indigestion, abdominal pain) one month after surgery for the acute operation group (p < 0.01). Three and 6 months after the operation we were unable to detect any significant differences between the groups. The patients in the delayed operation group did not appear to suffer from more symptoms in the period of time waiting for their elective operation. Psychological general well-being showed no major differences between the groups. Conclusion: Cholecystectomy in the acute phase of acute cholecystitis offers a significant reduction of gastrointestinal symptoms during the first postoperative month and to that associated improved quality of life in this group of patients.
These data emphasize the clinical efficacy of antireflux surgery, with normalization of the quality of life in terms of well-being after these procedures. It should be noted that these instruments are sensitive enough to pick up significant differences between different antireflux procedures and should therefore be frequently used in the attempt to refine and optimize long-term therapeutic alternatives in reflux disease.
The total community-based costs for the open and laparoscopic operations for chronic GERD amounted to 74,608 and 40,289 SEK, respectively. Thus, we would recommend the laparoscopic procedure in most cases.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.