This study tests the hypothesis that the facilitation of learning and improvement of memory observed after an intracerebroventricular (i.c.v.) injection of angiotensin II (Ang II) is, in fact, caused by its derivative angiotensin IV (Ang IV). We ran two memory tests as well as an auxiliary test assessing motor performance in rats injected (i.c.v., 1 nmol in 2 microl saline) with Ang II or Ang IV. There were separate groups receiving peptide or saline five, 10 and 15 minutes before testing. Ang IV significantly increased step-through latencies in a passive avoidance paradigm as well as improved discrimination between familiar and unfamiliar objects in an object recognition test in all groups showing better retrieval of memory of aversive as well as appetitive stimuli in the peptide-treated groups regardless of the time of its injection. In contrast, rats treated with Ang II demonstrated significant improvement of memory of aversive and appetitive stimuli in the same tests only 15 minutes after its i.c.v. injection, with no effect in the groups injected five minutes before testing and slight efficacy in those injected 10 minutes before the test. Numbers of crossings, rearings and bar approaches in an open field were similar both in the peptide-treated and control groups making it unlikely that changes in motor performance affected the memory tests. In line with the present views on the intracellular metabolism of Ang II, these results suggest degradation to Ang IV by aminopeptidases A and N is necessary before the cognitive effects can occur.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract