This review summarizes reports of recurrent DNA sequence copy number losses in human neoplasms detected by comparative genomic hybridization. Recurrent losses that affect each of the chromosome arms in 73 tumor types are tabulated from 169 reports. The tables are available online at http:// www.amjpathol.org and http://www.helsinki.fi/ϳlgl _www/CMG.html. The genes relevant to the lost regions are discussed for each of the chromosomes. The review is supplemented also by a list of known and putative tumor suppressor genes and DNA repair genes (see Table 1 , online). Losses are found in all chromosome arms , but they seem to be relatively rare at 1q , 2p , 3q , 5p , 6p , 7p , 7q , 8q , 12p , and 20q. Losses and their minimal common overlapping areas that were present in a great proportion of the 73 tumor entities reported in Table 2 (see online) are (in descending order of frequency): 9p23-p24 (48%) , 13q21 (47%) , 6q16 (44%) , 6q26-q27 (44%) , 8p23 (37%), 18q22-q23 (37%) , 17p12-p13 (34%) , 1p36.1 (34%), 11q23 (33%) , 1p22 (32%) , 4q32-qter (31%) , 14q22-q23 (25%) , 10q23 (25%) , 10q25-qter (25%) ,15q21 (23%) , 16q22 (23%) , 5q21 (23%) , 3p12-p14 (22%), 22q12 (22%) , Xp21 (21%) , Xq21 (21%) , and 10p12 ( Knowledge of chromosomal deletions has significantly contributed to the detection of tumor suppressor genes, since the inactivation of one allele, according to the twohit hypothesis, often results from a deletion on the chromosomal level.
Many human cancer susceptibility genes have been successfully mapped by genetic linkage studies. One that has so far eluded researchers is that for Peutz-Jeghers (P-J) syndrome, a condition characterized by intestinal hamartomatous polyposis and melanin spots of the lips, buccal mucosa and digits. A dramatically elevated risk of malignancy has also been documented. Gastrointestinal tumours as well as cancers of the breast, ovary, testis and uterine cervix appear to be overrepresented in families with this syndrome. The nature of hamartomatous polyps is equivicol. Hamartomas are usually considered histologically benign, but in the case of Peutz-Jeghers patients, there are reports of adenomatous and malignant changes in the polyps, and the possibility of a hamartoma-carcinoma sequence has been discussed. A search for a putative tumour suppressor locus was made using comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) of Peutz-Jeghers polyps, combined with loss of heterozygosity (LOH) study. Genetic linkage analysis in 12 families using markers from a deletion site demonstrated the presence of a high-penetrance locus in distal 19p with a multipoint lod score of 7.00 at marker D19S886 without evidence of genetic heterogeneity. The study demonstrates the power of CGH combined with LOH analysis in identifying putative tumour suppressor loci, and provides molecular evidence of malignant potential in hamartomas.
Summary The differential diagnosis of mesothelioma, primary adenocarcinomas and pleural metastases frequently causes problems. We have used the comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) technique on 34 malignant mesotheliomas and 30 primary lung carcinomas (adenocarcinoma, including bronchoalveolar carcinoma and large-cell anaplastic carcinoma) to compare their copy number changes and to evaluate the use of CGH to distinguish between these two types of tumour. In mesothelioma, gains of genetic material occurred as frequently as losses, whereas gains predominated over losses in carcinoma. In mesothelioma, the most frequent changes were losses in 4q, 6q and 14q and gains in 1 5q and 7p, whereas gains in 8q, 1 q, 7p, 5p and 6p were the most common changes in carcinoma. Amplification of KRAS2 was detected in two adenocarcinomas by Southern blot analysis. CGH showed gains in 12p in the same tumours. Statistically significant differences between the two types of tumour were detected in chromosomes X, 1, 2p, 4, 8q, 1 Oq, 1 2p, 1 4q, 1 5q and 1 8q. When comparing the frequency of gains and losses between mesothelioma and lung carcinoma using discriminant analysis, the sensitivity of CGH to differentiate mesotheliomas from lung carcinomas was 81% and the specificity 77%. The differences in DNA copy number changes between the two types of tumour suggest that they are genetically different tumour entities. Although CGH cannot be used as a definitive discriminatory method, we were able to distinguish between mesothelioma and lung carcinoma in a large proportion of the abnormal cases.
Summary Comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) analyses were performed on 27 human pleural mesothelioma tumour specimens, consisting of 18 frozen tumours and nine paraffin-embedded tumours, to screen for gains and losses of DNA sequences. Copy number changes were detected in 15 of the 27 specimens with a range from one to eight per specimen. On average, more losses than gains of genetic material were observed. The loss of DNA sequences occurred most commonly in the short arm of chromosome 9 (p21-pter), in 60% of the abnormal specimens. Other losses among the abnormal specimens were frequently detected in the long arms of chromosomes 4 (q31 .1-qter, 20%), 6 (q22-q24, 33%), 13 (33%), 14 (q24-qter, 33%) and 22 (q13, 20%). A gain in DNA sequences was found in the long arm of chromosome 1 (cen-qter) in 33% of the abnormal specimens. Our analysis is the first genome-wide screening for gains and losses of DNA sequences using comparative genomic hybridization in malignant pleural mesothelioma tumours. The recurrent DNA sequence changes detected in this study suggest that the corresponding chromosomal areas most probably contain genes important for the initiation and progression of mesothelioma.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.