No abstract

BackgroundMicroRNA dysregulation is a common event in leukemia. Polymorphisms in microRNA-binding sites (miRSNPs) in target genes may alter the strength of microRNA interaction with target transcripts thereby affecting protein levels. In this study we aimed at identifying miRSNPs associated with leukemia risk and assessing impact of these miRSNPs on miRNA binding to target transcripts.MethodsWe analyzed with specialized algorithms the 3′ untranslated regions of 137 leukemia-associated genes and identified 111 putative miRSNPs, of which 10 were chosen for further investigation. We genotyped patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML, n = 87), chronic myeloid leukemia (CML, n = 140), childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL, n = 101) and healthy controls (n = 471). Association between SNPs and leukemia risk was calculated by estimating odds ratios in the multivariate logistic regression analysis. For miRSNPs that were associated with leukemia risk we performed luciferase reporter assays to examine whether they influence miRNA binding.ResultsHere we show that variant alleles of TLX1_rs2742038 and ETV6_rs1573613 were associated with increased risk of childhood ALL (OR (95% CI) = 3.97 (1.43-11.02) and 1.9 (1.16-3.11), respectively), while PML_rs9479 was associated with decreased ALL risk (OR = 0.55 (0.36-0.86). In adult myeloid leukemias we found significant associations between the variant allele of PML_rs9479 and decreased AML risk (OR = 0.61 (0.38-0.97), and between variant alleles of IRF8_ rs10514611 and ARHGAP26_rs187729 and increased CML risk (OR = 2.4 (1.12-5.15) and 1.63 (1.07-2.47), respectively). Moreover, we observed a significant trend for an increasing ALL and CML risk with the growing number of risk genotypes with OR = 13.91 (4.38-44.11) for carriers of ≥3 risk genotypes in ALL and OR = 4.9 (1.27-18.85) for carriers of 2 risk genotypes in CML. Luciferase reporter assays revealed that the C allele of ARHGAP26_rs187729 creates an illegitimate binding site for miR-18a-3p, while the A allele of PML_rs9479 enhances binding of miR-510-5p and the C allele of ETV6_rs1573613 weakens binding of miR-34c-5p and miR-449b-5p.ConclusionsOur study implicates that microRNA-binding site polymorphisms modulate leukemia risk by interfering with the miRNA-mediated regulation. Our findings underscore the significance of variability in 3′ untranslated regions in leukemia.

DNA Double-strand breaks are considered one of the most lethal form of DNA damage. Many effective anticancer therapeutic approaches used chemical and physical methods to generate DNA double-strand breaks in the cancer cells. They include: IR and drugs which mimetic its action, topoisomerase poisons, some alkylating agents or drugs which affected DNA replication process. On the other hand, cancer cells are mostly characterized by highly effective systems of DNA damage repair. There are two main DNA repair pathways used to fix double-strand breaks: NHEJ and HRR. Their activity leads to a decreased effect of chemotherapy. Targeting directly or indirectly the DNA double-strand breaks response by inhibitors seems to be an exciting option for anticancer therapy and is a part of novel trends that arise after the clinical success of PARP inhibitors. These trends will provide great opportunities for the development of DNA repair inhibitors as new potential anticancer drugs. The main objective of this article is to address these new promising advances.

No abstract

Topoisomerase II (Topo2) inhibitors in combination with cisplatin represent a common treatment modality used for glioma patients. The main mechanism of their action involves induction of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). DSBs are repaired via the homology-dependent DNA repair (HRR) and non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ). Inhibition of the NHEJ or HRR pathway sensitizes cancer cells to the treatment. In this work, we investigated the effect of three Topo2 inhibitors-etoposide, NK314, or HU-331 in combination with cisplatin in the U-87 human glioblastoma cell line. Etoposide as well as NK314 inhibited Topo2 activity by stabilizing Topo2-DNA cleavable complexes whereas HU-331 inhibited the ATPase activity of Topo2 using a noncompetitive mechanism. To increase the effectiveness of the treatment, we combined cisplatin and Topo2 inhibitor treatment with DSB repair inhibitors (DRIs). The cells were sensitized with NHEJ inhibitor, NU7441, or the novel HRR inhibitor, YU238259, prior to drug treatment. All of the investigated Topo2 inhibitors in combination with cisplatin efficiently killed the U-87 cells. The most cytotoxic effect was observed for the cisplatin + HU331 treatment scheme and this effect was significantly increased when a DRI pretreatment was used; however, we did not observed DSBs. Therefore, the molecular mechanism of cytotoxicity caused by the cisplatin + HU331 treatment scheme is yet to be evaluated. We observed a concentration-dependent change in DSB levels and accumulation at the G2/M checkpoint and S-phase in glioma cells incubated with NK314/cisplatin and etoposide/cisplatin. In conclusion, in combination with cisplatin, HU331 is the most potent Topo2 inhibitor of human glioblastoma cells.