For glioblastoma, the tumor microenvironment (TME) is pivotal to support tumor progression and therapeutic resistance. TME consists of several types of stromal, endothelial and immune cells, which are recruited by cancer stem cells (CSCs) to influence CSC phenotype and behavior. TME also promotes the establishment of specific conditions such as hypoxia and acidosis, which play a critical role in glioblastoma chemoresistance, interfering with angiogenesis, apoptosis, DNA repair, oxidative stress, immune escape, expression and activity of multi-drug resistance (MDR)-related genes. Finally, the blood brain barrier (BBB), which insulates the brain microenvironment from the blood, is strongly linked to the drug-resistant phenotype of glioblastoma, being a major physical and physiological hurdle for the delivery of chemotherapy agents into the brain. Here, we review the features of the glioblastoma microenvironment, focusing on their involvement in the phenomenon of chemoresistance; we also summarize recent advances in generating systems to modulate or bypass the BBB for drug delivery into the brain. Genetic aspects associated with glioblastoma chemoresistance and current immune-based strategies, such as checkpoint inhibitor therapy, are described too.
Predicting the outcome of in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is one main goal of the present research on assisted reproduction. To understand whether density gradient centrifugation (DGC), used to select sperm, can affect sperm DNA integrity and impact pregnancy rate (PR), we prospectively evaluated sperm DNA fragmentation (sDF) by TUNEL/PI, before and after DGC. sDF was studied in a cohort of 90 infertile couples the same day of IVF/ICSI treatment. After DGC, sDF increased in 41 samples (Group A, median sDF value: 29.25% [interquartile range, IQR: 16.01–41.63] in pre- and 60.40% [IQR: 32.92–93.53] in post-DGC) and decreased in 49 (Group B, median sDF value: 18.84% [IQR: 13.70–35.47] in pre- and 8.98% [IQR: 6.24–15.58] in post-DGC). PR was 17.1% and 34.4% in Group A and B, respectively (odds ratio [OR]: 2.58, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.95–7.04, P = 0.056). After adjustment for female factor, female and male age and female BMI, the estimated OR increased to 3.12 (95% CI: 1.05–9.27, P = 0.041). According to the subgroup analysis for presence/absence of female factor, heterogeneity in the association between the Group A and B and PR emerged (OR: 4.22, 95% CI: 1.16–15.30 and OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 0.23–10.40, respectively, for couples without, n = 59, and with, n = 31, female factor).This study provides the first evidence that the DGC procedure produces an increase in sDF in about half of the subjects undergoing IVF/ICSI, who then show a much lower probability of pregnancy, raising concerns about the safety of this selection procedure. Evaluation of sDF before and after DGC configures as a possible new prognostic parameter of pregnancy outcome in IVF/ICSI. Alternative sperm selection strategies are recommended for those subjects who undergo the damage after DGC.
Despite multimodal treatments comprising, radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy with temozolomide (TMZ), the prognosis of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) remains dismal and consolidated therapy yields a median survival of 14.6 months.Blood Brain Barrier (BBB) mediated chemoresistance and high dose related toxicity make necessary the development of new therapeutic approach to sensitize GBM to TMZ.The aim of the present study was to investigate the potential of the treatment morphine plus TMZ metronmic doses (1,77 and 0,9 mg/kg) in GBM therapy.The effect of morphine, on tumor cell growth and P-glycoprothein (P-gp) activity, was investigate in in vitro models.The results demonstrated that GBM cells growth is not influenced by morphine treatment and, for the first time, we show that morphine is an inhibitor of the activity of P-gp efflux transporter who is markedly expressed on BBB.In vivo, response to the treatments TMZ plus morphine was investigated in an orthotopic nude mice model of GBM.Animals treated with TMZ metronomic doses showed a significant tumor growth inhibition compared to untreated mice and association with morphine appears to improve TMZ efficacy.Moreover, the combination of morphine with lower dose of TMZ result in a cytostatic effect on tumor growth over the period of the pharmacological treatments.In conclusion this novel approach could be a successful strategy to overcome chemoresistance and side effects TMZ mediated, reducing drug dosage and improving long term response, in GBM therapy.
Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) is still an incurable disease. The front-line Temozolomide (TMZ)-based therapy suffers from poor efficacy, underlining the need of new therapies.Preclinically, Aldoxorubicin (Aldox), a novel prodrug of Doxorubicin (Dox), has been successfully tested against GBM, encouraging the study of its association with other agents.For the first time, we evaluated the effectiveness of Aldox combined to TMZ in preclinical models of GBM.Our in vitro results demonstrated that the anti–glioma effect of Aldox was more marked than TMZ and their combination increased the killing effect of the anthracycline in TMZ-resistant GBM cells. Moreover, unlike Dox, Aldox was able to accumulate in P-glycoprotein (P-gp)-overexpressed cells due to a negative regulation of the P-gp function.We also compared efficacy and safety of weekly administrations of Aldox (16 mg/kg), with or without TMZ (0.9 mg/kg, daily injections), in the U87 xenograft mouse model.Aldox therapy induced a moderate tumor volume inhibition (TVI) and an increased survival rate (+12.5% vs vehicle). On the other hand, when combined to TMZ, Aldox caused a significant TVI (P=0.0175 vs vehicle) and delayed the mortality during the experimental period, although TVI and endpoint survival percentage (+37.5% vs vehicle) were not significantly different from TMZ alone.Our preliminary data showed that Aldox exerts anti–glioma effects in vitro and in vivo. It also enhances its antitumor activity when combined with TMZ, resulting in a superior efficacy compared to the single agents, without adverse side effects.
Despite being long lived, anthracyclines remain the “evergreen” drugs in clinical practice of oncology, showing a potent effect in inhibiting cell growth in many types of tumors, including brain neoplasms. Unfortunately, they suffer from a poor penetration into the brain when intravenously administered due to multidrug resistance mechanism, which hampers their delivery across the blood brain barrier.In this paper, we summarize the current literature on the role of anthracyclines in cancer therapy and highlight recent efforts on 1) development of tumor cell resistance to anthracyclines and 2) the new approaches to brain drug delivery across the blood brain barrier.
Despite numerous clinical trials, glioblastoma (GBM) remains a tumor that is difficult to treat. The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of a new pharmacological approach, combining doxorubicin (Dox) and rapamycin (Rapa), in in vitro and in vivo GBM models. Cytotoxic and anti-proliferative effects of Rapa plus Dox treatments were analyzed in GBM cell lines. The in vivo effectiveness of these treatments was investigated in an orthotopic xenograft mice model of GBM. In vitro results demonstrated that prolonged exposure to Rapa sensitize GBM cells to Dox treatments. In vivo results demonstrated that Rapa (5 mg/kg) plus Dox (5 mg/kg) determined the major tumor growth inhibition (−97.29% vs. control) but results in greater toxicity. The combination Rapa plus Dox (2.5 mg/kg) showed a tumor inhibition like Rapa plus Dox (5 mg/kg) with a toxicity comparable to Rapa alone. Thus, this study demonstrated the efficacy of this pharmacological approach, providing the rationale for a clinical application of this combinational therapy in “poor-responder” GBM patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.