Many Salix species (Salicaceae) have a high energy quotum and efficient nitrogen use, resulting in a high and stable biomass production, making these plants suitable as bioenergy crops. However, Salix coppices are sensitive to herbivory by chrysomelid beetles, such as Phratora vulgatissima L. (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), and to maintain high biomass yields over several years, durable plant resistance is necessary. We have developed a reliable and efficient bioassay that can be used as a tool for detection of resistance against P. vulgatissima in Salix. Screening of six clones of one susceptible (Salix viminalis L.) and one resistant (Salix dasyclados Wimm.) willow species, by the response of several life history traits of larval and adult P. vulgatissima, identified egg production as the most reliable trait for resistance. We show that a 2‐week bioassay of oviposition rate is sufficient for a trustworthy estimation of both total egg production and survival of adult leaf beetles. In addition, to elucidate the variation in resistance among the studied clones, leaf concentrations of various phenolic compounds were compared with the key life history traits of the beetles. Phenolic compounds, especially salicylates, have previously been reported as the main factor controlling Salix resistance against P. vulgatissima. Indeed we found higher levels of salicylates in the resistant clones and larval performance was negatively correlated to the concentration of salicylates in the leaves. In addition, we found indications of negative effects of a luteolin derivative and quercetin‐3‐glucoside on leaf beetle performance, but further studies are needed to elucidate the specific roles that the different phenolic compounds play in plant resistance.
1. Omnivorous predators can protect plants from herbivores, but may also consume plant material themselves. Omnivores and their purely herbivorous prey have previously been thought to respond similarly to host-plant quality. However, different responses of omnivores and herbivores to their shared host plants may influence the fitness, trophic identity, and population dynamics of the omnivores.2. The aim of the present study was to show that an omnivorous heteropteran (Anthocoris nemorum L.) and two strictly herbivorous prey species respond differently to different genotypes of their shared host plant, Salix. Some plant genotypes were sub-optimal for the omnivore, although suitable for the herbivores, and vice versa.3. The contrasting patterns of plant suitability for the omnivore and the herbivores highlight an interaction between plant genotype and omnivores' access to animal food. Plant genotypes that were sub-optimal for the omnivore when herbivores were experimentally excluded became the best host plants when herbivores were present, as in the latter situation additional prey became available. By contrast, the quality of plant genotypes that were intrinsically suitable for omnivores, did not improve when herbivores were present as these plant genotypes were intrinsically sub-optimal for herbivores, thus providing omnivores with almost no additional animal food. 4. The differential responses of omnivores and their prey to the same host-plant genotypes should allow omnivores to colonise sub-optimal host plants in their capacity as predators, and to colonise more suitable host plants in their capacity as herbivores. It may thus be difficult for Salix to escape herbivory entirely, as it will rarely be unsuitable for both omnivores and pure herbivores at the same time.
Little is known about how herbivore-induced plant volatiles affect omnivorous predators. Here we show that the key predator Anthocoris nemorum is differentially attracted to three Salix clones when these are damaged by the detrimental blue willow beetle (Phratora vulgatissima). At least two volatile plant compounds were induced by the herbivore, and these were antennal active in the predator. The results elucidate how plants may recruit omnivorous predators when damaged. These findings could be utilized in crop breeding for increased resistance against herbivores.
The European honey bee (Apis mellifera) is important both for pollination and for honey production. Pollen is the major protein source for bees, which exposes them directly to changes in pollen quality e.g. through genetic engineering. In order to create a worst case scenario regarding pea lectin (PSL) expressed transgenically in oilseed rape anthers and pollen, the maximum amount of dried pollen that could be mixed in an artificial diet without negatively affecting larval performance (1.5% w/w) was fed to bee larvae. Pollen from two transgenic plant lines expressing PSL up to 1.2% of total soluble protein and pollen from one non-transgenic line was added to the same diet and used as a pollen control. When these three pollen diets and the control diet (without added pollen) were compared, no negative effect from the pollen of the transgenic plants could be detected on larval mortality, weight, or development time. An increased weight and a reduced developmental time were recorded for larvae on all diets containing pollen when compared to the diet without pollen.
Adult pollen beetles were exposed to three transgenic lines of Brassica napus L. expressing pea lectin up to 0.7% of total soluble protein in anthers. Two lines not expressing the pea lectin were used as controls. Adult responses were recorded in two experiments where beetles were fed either racemes or anthers. There was no effect of plant line on feeding rate, weight change or oviposition rate. A slightly reduced egg size was recorded when beetles were feeding on one of the plant lines with high concentration of pea lectin. Previous studies on the effect of pea lectin on pollen beetles have only focused on larval performance. The results of this study suggest that pea lectin has no adverse effect on the pest in its most damaging life stage.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.