Objective To assess the relationship and location of vaginal prolapse severity to symptoms and quality of life.Design A prospective observational study.Setting Urogynaecology Unit, Imperial College, St Mary's Hospital, London.Population Women with and without symptoms of vaginal prolapse.Methods All women completed a validated Prolapse Quality of Life (P-QOL) questionnaire. This included a urinary, bowel and sexual symptom questionnaire. All women were examined using the Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification system (POP-Q). POP-Q scores in those with and without prolapse symptoms were compared. Urinary and bowel symptoms and sexual function were compared and related to prolapse severity and location. Main outcome measures POP-Q scores, P-QOL scores, urinary and bowel symptoms and sexual function.Results Three hundred and fifty-five women were recruited -233 symptomatic and 122 asymptomatic of prolapse. The median P-QOL domain scores ranged between 42-100 in symptomatic women and 0-25 in those who were asymptomatic. The stage of prolapse was significantly higher in those symptomatic of prolapse (P < 0.001) except for perineal body (PB) measurement. Urinary symptoms were not correlated with uterovaginal prolapse severity whereas bowel symptoms were strongly associated with posterior vaginal wall prolapse. Cervical descent was found to have a relationship with sexual dysfunction symptoms. Conclusions Women who present with symptoms specific to pelvic organ prolapse demonstrate greater degrees of pelvic relaxation than women who present without symptoms. Prolapse severity and quality of life scores are significantly different in those women symptomatic of prolapse. There was a stronger relationship between posterior prolapse and bowel symptoms than anterior prolapse and urinary symptoms. Sexual dysfunction was related to cervical descent.

Pressure flow parameters appear to be useful urodynamic tools in the evaluation of women with LUTS as they help the clinician in assessing the urethral and detrusor function.

No abstract

All women who had three elective caesarean sections were selected from a database of 40,000 women delivering between 1977 and 1998, and age-matched with women having three vaginal births. They all completed a (validated) urinary and bowel symptom questionnaire. Women who had vaginal births had a significantly higher prevalence of stress incontinence but not other urinary or faecal symptoms compared with those delivered by caesarean section. The prevalence of faecal incontinence was lower than the prevalence of urinary incontinence. Although the prevalence of faecal incontinence was lower after caesarean delivery, this was not statistically different. These data have shown that caesarean section was associated with a lower risk of urinary incontinence, although a protective effect on development of faecal symptoms was not seen.

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the intra-and inter-rater reliability of pressure flow parameters in women. Design A prospective study.Setting Tertiary referral unit in a London teaching Hospital.Population Urodynamic traces of 621 women were studied to assess the reproducibility and reliability of pressure flow parameters. Methods Women with lower urinary tract symptoms were studied prospectively. Opening detrusor pressure (ODP), detrusor pressure at maximum flow rate P detQ max , maximum flow rate (Q max ) and closure detrusor pressure (CDP) were measured by the same observer twice, one week apart. Pressure flows were compared using different media for filling (saline and contrast). All parameters were also measured in nine women from multiple voids during ambulatory urodynamics to assess their reproducibility and finally were remeasured by a second observer. Results There was good intra-observer agreement for all pressure flow parameters except detrusor pressure at maximum flow rate and good inter-observer agreement for opening detrusor pressure, closure detrusor pressure and detrusor pressure at maximum flow rate. There was no significant difference between parameters using saline or contrast (P > 0.05, independent samples t test). Conclusion Pressure flow parameters appear to be reproducible and consistent urodynamic measurements in women.