Background In contrast to general anesthetics such as propofol, dexmedetomidine when used for sedation has been put forward as a drug with minimal effects on respiration. To obtain a more comprehensive understanding of the regulation of breathing during sedation with dexmedetomidine, the authors compared ventilatory responses to hypoxia and hypercapnia during sedation with dexmedetomidine and propofol. Methods Eleven healthy male volunteers entered this randomized crossover study. Sedation was administered as an intravenous bolus followed by an infusion and monitored by Observer’s Assessment of Alertness/Sedation (OAA/S) scale, Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale, and Bispectral Index Score. Hypoxic and hypercapnic ventilatory responses were measured at rest, during sedation (OAA/S 2 to 4), and after recovery. Drug exposure was verified with concentration analysis in plasma. Results Ten subjects completed the study. The OAA/S at the sedation goal was 3 (3 to 4) (median [minimum to maximum]) for both drugs. Bispectral Index Score was 82 ± 8 and 75 ± 3, and the drug concentrations in plasma at the sedation target were 0.66 ± 0.14 ng/ml and 1.26 ± 0.36 μg/ml for dexmedetomidine and propofol, respectively. Compared with baseline, sedation reduced hypoxic ventilation to 59 and 53% and the hypercapnic ventilation to 82 and 86% for dexmedetomidine and propofol, respectively. In addition, some volunteers displayed upper airway obstruction and episodes of apnea during sedation. Conclusions Dexmedetomidine-induced sedation reduces ventilatory responses to hypoxia and hypercapnia to a similar extent as sedation with propofol. This finding implies that sedation with dexmedetomidine interacts with both peripheral and central control of breathing.

Obstructive sleep apnoea and residual neuromuscular blockade are, independently, known to be risk factors for respiratory complications after major surgery. Residual effects of neuromuscular blocking agents are known to reduce the hypoxic ventilatory response in healthy volunteers. Patients with obstructive sleep apnoea have impaired control of breathing, but it is not known to what extent neuromuscular blocking agents interfere with the regulation of breathing in such patients. In a physiological study in 10 unsedated men with untreated obstructive sleep apnoea, we wished to examine if partial neuromuscular blockade had an effect on hypoxic ventilatory response (isocapnic hypoxia to oxygen saturation of 80%) and hypercapnic ventilatory response (normoxic inspired carbon dioxide 5%). The hypoxic ventilatory response was reduced by 32% (p = 0.016) during residual neuromuscular block (rocuronium to train-of-four ratio 0.7), but the hypercapnic ventilatory response was unaffected. We conclude that neuromuscular blockade specifically depresses peripheral chemosensitivity, and not respiratory muscle function since the hypercapnic ventilatory response was unaffected.