With the ultimate goal of investigating boundary conditions for post-reactivation amnesia, we set out to replicate studies in which systemic, post-reactivation administration of midazolam, propranolol, or cycloheximide resulted in amnesia for contextual fear memories. Our experiments involved conceptual as well as exact replications of previously published studies. In most of our experiments, we adopted a procedure that conformed to the standard 3-day protocol typically used in the literature, with contextual fear conditioning on day 1, unreinforced re-exposure to the conditioning context followed by systemic injection of the amnestic drug on day 2, and a memory retention test on day 3. Given the plethora of successful studies with large effects sizes and the absence of any failed replications in the literature, we were surprised to find that we were generally unable to replicate those findings. Our results suggest that post-reactivation amnesia by systemic drug administration in rats is more difficult to obtain than what would be expected based on published empirical reports. At present, it remains unclear which conditions determine the success of this procedure.

Rodents have become a popular model in vision science. It is still unclear how vision in rodents relates to primate vision when it comes to complex visual tasks. Here we report on the results of training rats in a face-categorization and generalization task. Additionally, the Bubbles paradigm is used to determine the behavioral templates of the animals. We found that rats are capable of face categorization and can generalize to previously unseen exemplars. Performance is affected-but remains above chance-by stimulus modifications such as upside-down and contrast-inverted stimuli. The behavioral templates of the rats overlap with a pixel-based template, with a bias toward the upper left parts of the stimuli. Together, these findings significantly expand the evidence about the extent to which rats learn complex visual-categorization tasks.

Background Long-term memory formation is generally assumed to involve the permanent storage of recently acquired memories, making them relatively insensitive to disruption, a process referred to as memory consolidation. However, when retrieved under specific circumstances, consolidated fear memories are thought to return to a labile state, thereby opening a window for modification (e.g., attenuation) of the memory. Several interventions during a critical time frame after this destabilization seem to be able to alter the retrieved memory, for example by pharmacologically interfering with the restabilization process, either by direct protein synthesis inhibition or indirectly, using drugs that can be safely administered in patients (e.g., propranolol). Here, we find that, contrary to expectations, systemic pharmacological manipulations in auditory fear-conditioned rats do not lead to drug-induced post-retrieval amnesia. Results In a series of well-powered auditory fear conditioning experiments (four with propranolol, 10 mg/kg, two with rapamycin, 20–40 mg/kg, one with anisomycin, 150 mg/kg and cycloheximide, 1.5 mg/kg), we found no evidence for reduced cued fear memory expression during a drug-free test in adult male Sprague-Dawley rats that had previously received a systemic drug injection upon retrieval of the tone fear memory. All experiments used standard fear conditioning and reactivation procedures with freezing as the behavioral read-out (conceptual or exact replications of published reports) and common pharmacological agents. Additional tests confirmed that the applied drug doses and administration routes were effective in inducing their conventional effects on expression of fear (propranolol, acutely), body weight (rapamycin, anisomycin, cycloheximide), and consolidation of extinction memories (cycloheximide). Conclusions In contrast with previously published studies, we did not find evidence for drug-induced post-retrieval amnesia, underlining that this effect, as well as its clinical applicability, may be considerably more constrained and less readily reproduced than what the current literature would suggest.

Models of object recognition have mostly focused upon the hierarchical processing of objects from local edges up to more complex shape features. An alternative strategy that might be involved in pattern recognition centres around coarse-level contrast features. In humans and monkeys, the use of such features is most documented in the domain of face perception. Given prior suggestions that, generally, rodents might rely upon contrast features for object recognition, we hypothesized that they would pick up the typical contrast features relevant for face detection. We trained rats in a face-nonface categorization task with stimuli previously used in computer vision and tested for generalization with new, unseen stimuli by including manipulations of the presence and strength of a range of contrast features previously identified to be relevant for face detection. Although overall generalization performance was low, it was significantly modulated by contrast features. A model taking into account the summed strength of contrast features predicted the variation in accuracy across stimuli. Finally, with deep neural networks, we further investigated and quantified the performance and representations of the animals. The findings suggest that rat behaviour in visual pattern recognition tasks is partially explained by contrast feature processing.