Driving under the influence (DUI) of alcohol is a road safety problem. Driving license regranting is based on the evaluation of medicolegal and toxicological variables that may include serum carbohydrate‐deficient transferrin (CDT) and hair ethyl glucuronide (hEtG).The aim of the study was to compare the diagnostic performance of CDT and hEtG in a population of DUI offenders. Other factors potentially associated with heavy alcohol use were explored. The population included DUI offenders examined during the period of January 1, 2019, through June 30, 2022. Sociodemographic, medicolegal, and toxicological variables were collected. CDT in serum and EtG in head hair were determined in all subjects. Excessive alcohol intake (hEtG ≥30 pg/mg) was considered cause for unfitness to drive. Cohen's kappa coefficient was calculated. Descriptive analyses were performed using chi‐square and Mann–Whitney tests. Variables significantly different between the groups were included in a multivariate binary logistic regression model. The sample encompassed 838 subjects (case group: 179, comparison group: 689). CDT exhibited poor agreement (κ = 0.053) with hEtG as the reference test. Lower education, age at DUI, heavy smoking, and GGT levels associated with heavy alcohol consumption differentiated the two groups. For DUI offenders, the use of CDT to assess heavy alcohol consumption is limited, possibly due to the time‐window assessed, the time required for normalization, and the different amount of ethanol needed to reach higher CDT levels, in comparison to hEtG; thus, hEtG assessment is strongly recommended for this population. Heavy smoking, GGT, education, and age could be related to heavy alcohol consumption and higher risk of DUI.

No abstract

The motion approved by the Italian National Bioethics Committee January 30th,2020, entitled “Aggressive treatments or unreasonable obstinacy in medical care of children with short life expectancy”, sets out 12 recommendations for physicians who take care of these children and have the duty to communicate with their parents. The intent of this motion is to give the family the necessary information and support during the decision-making process. Each recommendation is analytically commented. Recommendation 1 advocates the adoption of shared decision-making by the entire healthcare team; promotes the relief of pain and suffering; inhibits disproportionate and ineffective medical treatments; opposes a defensive medicine. Recommendation 2 asks for the promulgation of a national law that establishes clinical ethics committees in Children’s Hospitals. Recommendation 3 implies that parents or legal guardians should be involved in the decision-making process of physicians and clinical ethics committees. Recommendation 4 states that a second opinion may be requested by both the parents and the physicians. Recommendation 5 admits an appeal to the judge in the event of an irreconcilable conflict between the health care team and the family. Recommendation 6 endorses the medical accompaniment of the dying patient, also by means of continuous deep sedation and analgesia. Recommendation 7 enunciates the principle that patients shall have the right to access to palliative care. Recommendation 8 confirms the necessity to strengthen research focused on pediatric pain and suffering. Recommendation 9 excludes that excessive medical treatment may be justified by the need to carry out experiments or research projects. Recommendation 10 concerns the training of physician, other healthcare workers and psychologists in order to support children’s parents both emotionally and practically. Recommendation 11 exhorts to encourage the interaction between parents and seriously ill children. Recommendation 12 assigns a prominent role to parents’ associations for ill children.

While gastro-oesophageal varices commonly complicate portal hypertension and may be a life-threatening condition, fatal haemorrhaging from cirrhosis-related caput medusae has seldom been described in the scientific literature. This article documents a rare death due to the rupture of a varix in the umbilical area. This case raises a number of points for medico-legal discussion, such as the negative consequences of an erroneous cause of death in evaluating medical malpractice cases and the importance of a thorough external examination of the body in order to ensure this type of vascular lesion is not overlooked.

In clinical practice, there may be situations of conflict between parents and doctors regarding care choices for minors. A relatively frequent case is represented by the parents’ refusal to consent to blood transfusion. The article outlines an updated legislative framework on the issue and a possible operational approach, which has proved to be effective in meeting the health needs of patients and the wishes expressed by parents.