Hypothesis/aims of study. Miscarriage is a significant medical and social problem. The etiology of pregnancy losses is diverse and depends on many factors. It is believed that dysbiotic disorders of the vagina are one of the main causes of this pathology. While the etiopathogenesis of miscarriage is actively studied, many questions still remain open. The aim of the study was to investigate anamnestic and microbiological predictor factors of miscarriage. Study design, materials, and methods. In a prospective cohort study, 159 pregnant women were examined in the first trimester of pregnancy: the anamnesis, course of pregnancy, vaginal microflora, and present pregnancy outcome were studied. The vaginal microflora was analyzed using microscopic, bacteriological and quantitative real-time PCR methods. Depending on the present pregnancy outcome, the patients were divided into two groups: those delivered at term and women with early and late miscarriage. The analysis of predictors of miscarriage of the ongoing pregnancy was performed depending on the period of delivery. Results. The rate of miscarriage in women was 13%. The independent predictors of early miscarriage were chronic endometritis (OR 10.54; 95% CI 2.54 to 43.64), the dominance of Lactobacillus iners in the vaginal microflora (OR 8.52; 95% CI 2.07 to 35.05), and the prevalence of non-Lactobacillus species in microscopy of vaginal preparations (OR 4.50; 95% CI 1.02 to 19.69). The dominance of Lactobacillus crispatus was a significant protective factor of late miscarriage (OR 0.20; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.99). Conclusion. The undertaken analysis revealed significant associations of a number of anamnestic and microbiological predictor factors with miscarriage, which will enable to substantiate approaches for predicting pregnancy outcomes at different gestational age and to develop methods of pre-conception care and treatment in women with different risk of miscarriage.
Hypothesis/aims of study. Dysbiotic disorders of the vagina are one of the main risk factors of miscarriage. The analysis of vaginal microbiota during pregnancy in women having a history of miscarriage may contribute to understanding the importance of specific types of vaginal flora in the development of processes resulting in spontaneous abortion or preterm birth. This study was undertaken to evaluate the vaginal flora in the 1st trimester of pregnancy in women having a history of miscarriage. Study design, materials, and methods. To participate in the study, 160 individuals in the 1st trimester of pregnancy with and without a history of miscarriage were invited. Group 1 included 100 women with a history of miscarriage, group 2 consisted of 60 women without a history of miscarriage. The vaginal flora was analyzed with microscopic, bacteriological, and quantitative real-time PCR methods. Results. In patients with a history of miscarriage, the frequency of dysbiotic disorders of the vaginal flora was three times higher (11.0% and 3.3%) and pH value of the vaginal fluid was significantly higher. Along with a significant reduction of the proportion of the Lactobacillus flora in the 1st trimester of pregnancy in patients having a history of miscarriage, there was a significant increase in the abundance of opportunistic microorganisms, mostly aerobic flora, such as Enterobacteriaceae, Streptococcus spp., and Staphylococcus spp. Furthermore, there was a significant predominance of Ureaplasma spp. and Candida spp. in women with a miscarriage history. Conclusion. The vaginal microbiota in the 1st trimester of pregnancy in women having a history of miscarriage is characterized by higher pH values of the vaginal fluid, the prevalence of opportunistic microorganisms, a decrease in the abundance of the Lactobacillus flora, and a higher concentration of aerobic bacteria, Ureaplasma spp., and Candida spp. These findings indicate dysbiotic disorders of the vaginal microbiocenosis in women having a history of miscarriage, which can lead to late miscarriage and pretem birth.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.