BACKGROUND The majority of patients in need of a hematopoietic-cell transplant do not have a matched related donor. Data are needed to inform the choice among various alternative donor-cell sources. METHODS In this retrospective analysis, we compared outcomes in 582 consecutive patients with acute leukemia or the myelodysplastic syndrome who received a first myeloablative hematopoietic-cell transplant from an unrelated cord-blood donor (140 patients), an HLA-matched unrelated donor (344), or an HLA-mismatched unrelated donor (98). RESULTS The relative risks of death and relapse between the cord-blood group and the two other unrelated-donor groups appeared to vary according to the presence of minimal residual disease status before transplantation. Among patients with minimal residual disease, the risk of death was higher in the HLA-mismatched group than in the cord-blood group (hazard ratio, 2.92; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.52 to 5.63; P = 0.001); the risk was also higher in the HLA-matched group than in the cord-blood group but not significantly so (hazard ratio, 1.69; 95% CI, 0.94 to 3.02; P = 0.08). Among patients without minimal residual disease, the hazard ratios were lower (hazard ratio in the HLA-mismatched group, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.76 to 2.46; P = 0.30; hazard ratio in the HLA-matched group, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.48 to 1.28; P = 0.33). The risk of relapse among patients with minimal residual disease was significantly higher in the two unrelated-donor groups than in the cord-blood group (hazard ratio in the HLA-mismatched group, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.22 to 7.38; P = 0.02; hazard ratio in the HLA-matched group, 2.92; 95% CI, 1.34 to 6.35; P = 0.007). Among patients without minimal residual disease, the magnitude of these associations was lower (hazard ratio in the HLA-mismatched group, 1.28; 95% CI, 0.51 to 3.25; P = 0.60; hazard ratio in the HLA-matched group, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.65 to 2.58; P = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS Our data suggest that among patients with pretransplantation minimal residual disease, the probability of overall survival after receipt of a transplant from a cord-blood donor was at least as favorable as that after receipt of a transplant from an HLA-matched unrelated donor and was significantly higher than the probability after receipt of a transplant from an HLA-mismatched unrelated donor. Furthermore, the probability of relapse was lower in the cord-blood group than in either of the other groups.

Despite progress in our understanding of the growth factors that support the progressive maturation of the various cell lineages of the hematopoietic system, less is known about factors that govern the self-renewal of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs), and our ability to expand human HSPC numbers ex vivo remains limited. Interest in stem cell expansion has been heightened by the increasing importance of HSCs in the treatment of both malignant and nonmalignant diseases, as well as their use in gene therapy. To date, most attempts to ex vivo expand HSPCs have used hematopoietic growth factors but have not achieved clinically relevant effects. More recent approaches, including our studies in which activation of the Notch signaling pathway has enabled a clinically relevant ex vivo expansion of HSPCs, have led to renewed interest in this arena. Here we briefly review early attempts at ex vivo expansion by cytokine stimulation followed by an examination of our studies investigating the role of Notch signaling in HSPC self-renewal. We will also review other recently developed approaches for ex vivo expansion, primarily focused on the more extensively studied cord bloodderived stem cell. Finally, we discuss some of the challenges still facing this field. (Blood. 2011;117(23):6083-6090) IntroductionThe hierarchical development of the hematopoietic system has become progressively better understood over the past few decades, aided in part by significant advances in identifying and isolating hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and their progeny. 1 Although advances have been made in understanding the hematopoietic growth factors that support the progressive maturation of the various cell lineages, less is known about factors that govern the self-renewal of hematopoietic stem cells and multipotent progenitor cells (MPPs) that consist of short-term repopulating stem cells and give rise to the different cell lineages, thereby impacting the ability to expand HSC and MPP (hematopoietic stem and progenitor cell [HSPC]) numbers ex vivo. Initial attempts at ex vivo expansion of HSCs focused on the use of soluble cytokines known to support lineage committed cells with the expectation that some of these factors also supported HSC proliferation. 2 These studies were based on the belief that cell lineage determination was a stochastic process combined with positive and negative cytokinemediated regulatory responses controlling survival and expansion of the stem cell population. 3 More recently, recognition of factors critical for embryologic development as well as discovery of other novel pathways that may influence HSC self-renewal have led to renewed interest in ex vivo expansion, which has been heightened by the increasing importance of HSPCs in the treatment of both malignant and nonmalignant diseases as well as their use in gene therapy.To date, most attempts to expand HSPC ex vivo for enhanced in vivo engraftment in patients have been clinically unsuccessful because of generation of insufficient cell numbers or improper...

Background: CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has demonstrated robust responses in refractory/relapsed subjects with CD19+ acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Our Phase 1 clinical trial demonstrated a minimal residual disease (MRD) negative complete remission (CR) rate of 93% at 21 days following SCRI-CAR19v1 (a CD19 specific CAR T cell product) infusion (PMID: 29171004). Though remission is frequently attained, approximately half of patients recur. Controversy exists regarding the benefit of hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) following CD19 CAR T cell therapy. Although not mandated by the study, our current institutional recommendation for relapsed/refractory patients without a history of allogeneic HCT is to undergo a HCT once in remission following SCRI-CAR19v1. Additionally, we have recommended HCT to those who have a short duration of persistence of SCRI-CAR19v1 in vivo regardless of prior HCT status. We report here the leukemia free survival (LFS) of subjects who proceeded to HCT following remission after SCRI-CAR19v1 infusion. Methods/Results: We analyzed the first 64 subjects on our Phase 1/2 trial, PLAT-02 (NCT02028455), with follow-up of ≥1 year to evaluate the potential benefit of consolidative HCT. We excluded subjects that did not respond (n=5) or relapsed prior to day 63 (n=9). Thirty-two of the evaluated subjects were treated on the Phase I dose finding portion of the study and 18 were treated on the Phase 2 portion at dose level of 1x106cells/kg. Of the 50 evaluable subjects, 33 had a history of at least one prior HCT, whereas 17 had no history of HCT. Figure A demonstrates the LFS for patients that did and did not undergo HCT following SCRI-CAR19v1. There is a trend towards improved LFS (p-value 0.057; Figure B) in patients who underwent first HCT following SCRI-CAR19v1. Of the 17 patients without a history of HCT, 3 did not pursue HCT following CAR therapy. Of those 3 subjects, only 1 remains in remission at 28 months. The other 2 subjects relapsed at 6 and 7 months with CD19+ and CD19- disease, respectively. Of the 14 patients that underwent first HCT after SCRI-CAR19v1, 2 relapsed following HCT. One had evidence of MRD by flow at the time of HCT and the other subject relapsed with CD19- disease. The role of second HCT following CAR therapy remains unclear. Of the 33 subjects with a history of HCT, 10 underwent a second HCT following SCRI-CAR19v1 infusion, and 5 are alive and remain in remission. The recurrences included 2 lineage switches and 2 CD19+ (1 was MRD positive by deep sequence prior to HCT), and one transplant related mortality (TRM). Of the 23 subjects that did not undergo a second HCT, 8 remain in remission (p-value not significant (NS); Figure C). We previously reported that subjects with a short duration of B cell aplasia (BCA) ≤63 days following SCRI-CAR19v1 have an increased risk of relapse. Here we show that subjects with short BCA who attained a CR and did not relapse prior to day 63 demonstrate a clear benefit of consolidative HCT (p-value 0.007; Figure D). Of the 15 subjects with short BCA (regardless of HCT history), 6 did not pursue HCT and all recurred (5 CD19+, 1 CD19-). Of the short BCA subjects that underwent HCT, 1 subject died of TRM (2ndHCT for this subject) and 2 subjects relapsed following HCT (1 was MRD positive prior to HCT). All events in the consolidative HCT group have occurred by 20 months following SCRI-CAR19v1. However, we continue to see late relapses following CAR T cell therapy in the group who did not proceed with HCT. Three subjects have relapsed beyond 2 years: 1 with CD19+ disease at 27months, 1 with CD19- disease at 41 months, and 1 patient with lineage switch AML at 38 months. Further analysis is needed to understand the continued long-term risk of relapse following CD19 CAR T cell therapy and the potential role and timing for consolidative HCT in patients with a previous HCT. Conclusions: We demonstrate a trend towards improved LFS for subjects without a history of HCT who undergo a consolidative HCT following CD19 CAR T cell therapy on PLAT-02. In addition, HCT appears to benefit subjects who attain a CR but are at increased risk of relapse with short-term BCA. Currently, the benefit of second HCT following CD19 CAR T cell therapy is unclear and may be restricted to those that have short functional persistence of SCRI-CAR19v1. Late relapses after SCRI-CAR19v1 have only occurred in those without consolidative HCT, but longer follow up is needed to confirm these findings. Figure Figure. Disclosures Jensen: Juno Therapeutics, Inc.: Consultancy, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding.

No abstract

Avoidance of TBI does not mitigate the need to provide diligent, ongoing surveillance for late effects.

When hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) is necessary for children with acute myeloid leukemia (AML), there remains debate about the best stem cell source. Post-HSCT relapse is a common cause of mortality, and complications such as chronic graft versus host disease (cGVHD) are debilitating and life-threatening. To compare post-HSCT outcomes of different donor sources, we retrospectively analyzed consecutive transplants performed in several international centers from 2005 to 2015. A total of 317 patients were studied: 19% matched sibling donor (MSD), 23% matched unrelated donor (MUD), 39% umbilical cord blood (UCB), and 19% double UCB (dUCB) recipients. The median age at transplant was 10 years (range, 0.42-21 years), and median follow-up was 4.74 years (range, 4.02-5.39 years). Comparisons were made while controlling for patient, transplant, and disease characteristics. There were no differences in relapse, leukemia-free survival, or nonrelapse mortality. dUCB recipients had inferior survival compared with matched sibling recipients, but all other comparisons showed similar overall survival. Despite the majority of UCB transplants being HLA mismatched, the rates of cGVHD were low, especially compared with the well-matched MUD recipients (hazard ratio, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.67; P = .02). The composite measure of cGVHD and leukemia-free survival (cGVHD-LFS), which represents both the quality of life and risk for mortality, was significantly better in the UCB compared with the MUD recipients (HR, 0.56; 95% confidence interval, 0.34-1; P = .03). In summary, the use of UCB is an excellent donor choice for pediatric patients with AML when a matched sibling cannot be identified.

Background: Venous thrombosis (VT) in children is often associated with a central venous catheter (CVC). We aimed to determine the incidence of VT associated with percutaneous non-tunnelled CVCs in a general paediatric population, and to identify risk factors for VT in this cohort. Methods: Observational, prospective study enrolling consecutive patients at a tertiary multidisciplinary paediatric hospital. A total of 211 percutaneous, non-tunnelled CVCs were analysed. Data regarding potential risk factors for CVCrelated VT were collected. Compression ultrasonography with colour Doppler was used to diagnose VT. Results: Overall, 30.3% of children developed CVC-related VT, with an incidence rate of 29.6 (confidence interval, 22.5e36.9) cases/1000 CVC days. Upper body CVC location, multiple lumen CVCs, and male gender were independent risk factors for VT in multivariate analysis. All upper body VTs were in the internal jugular vein (IJV). The occurrence of CVCrelated VT did not affect length of paediatric ICU or hospital stay. In patients with VT, femoral CVCs, young age, paediatric ICU admission, and a ratio of CVC/vein diameter >0.33 were associated with VT being symptomatic, occlusive, or both. IJV VT was often asymptomatic and non-occlusive. Conclusions: Paediatric non-tunnelled CVCs are frequently complicated by VT. Avoiding IJV CVCs and multiple lumen catheters could potentially reduce the overall risk of VT. However, IJV VT was more likely to be smaller and asymptomatic compared with femoral vein VT. More data are needed on the risk of complications from smaller, asymptomatic VT compared with the group of VT with symptoms or vein occlusion. Femoral vein CVCs and CVC/vein diameter >0.33 could be modifiable risk factors for VT with larger thrombotic mass. Clinical trial registration: ACTRN12615000442505.

Cytomegalovirus (CMV)-seropositive umbilical cord blood transplantation (CBT) recipients have a high incidence of CMV-associated complications. There are limited data regarding the efficacy of letermovir for preventing clinically significant CMV infection (CS-CMVi), and the impact of letermovir prophylaxis on delayed-onset CMV reactivation after letermovir discontinuation, in CBT recipients. We compared the cumulative incidence of CS-CMVi and CMV detection in 21 CMV-seropositive CBT recipients receiving letermovir prophylaxis with a historical cohort of 40 CBT recipients receiving high-dose valacyclovir prophylaxis. Letermovir was administered on day +1 up to day +98. The cumulative incidence of CS-CMVi was significantly lower by day 98 in the letermovir cohort (19% vs 65%). This difference was lost by 1 year due to a higher incidence of delayed-onset CMV reactivation in the letermovir cohort. No patients developed CMV disease in the letermovir cohort within the first 98 days compared with 2 cases (2.4%) in the high-dose valacyclovir cohort; 2 patients developed CMV enteritis after discontinuing letermovir. Median viral loads were similar in both cohorts. Thus, letermovir is effective at preventing CS-CMVi after CBT, but frequent delayed-onset infections after letermovir discontinuation mandate close monitoring and consideration for extended prophylaxis.