Over the past few decades, applications of ultrasound (US) in drug delivery have been documented widely for local and site-specific release of bioactives in a controlled manner, after acceptable use in mild physical therapy for tendinitis and bursitis, and for high-energy applications in fibroid ablation, cataract removal, bone fracture healing, etc. US is a non-invasive, efficient, targetable and controllable technique. Drug delivery can be enhanced by applying directed US in terms of targeting and intracellular uptake. US cannot only provide local hyperthermia but can also enhance local extravasations and permeability of the cell membrane for delivery of cell-impermeable and poorly permeable drugs. It is also found to increase the anticancer efficacy of drug against solid tumors by facilitating uniform drug delivery throughout the tumor mass. This review summarizes the mechanism of US; various drug delivery systems like microbubbles, liposomes, and micelles; and biological manifestations employed for improving treatment of cancer, i.e., hyperthermia and enhanced extravasation. Safety issues are also discussed for better therapeutic outcomes of US-assisted drug delivery to tumors. This review can be a beneficial asset to the scientists looking at non-invasive techniques (externally guided) for improving the anticancer potential of drug delivery systems.

No abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer of mortality in the world. Chemotherapy based treatment leads to innumerable side effects as it delivers the anticancer drug to both normal cells besides cancer cells. Sonic Hedgehog (SHH), Wnt wingless-type mouse mammary tumor virus/β-catenin, transforming growth factor-β/SMAD, epidermal growth factor receptor and Notch are the main signaling pathways involved in the progression of CRC. Targeted therapies necessitate information regarding the particular aberrant pathways. Advancements in gene therapies have resulted in the recognition of novel therapeutic targets related with these signal-transduction cascades. CRC is a step-wise process where mutations occur over the time and activation of oncogenes and deactivation of tissue suppressor genes takes place. Genetic changes which are responsible for the induction of carcinogenesis include loss of heterozygosity in tumor suppressor genes such as adenomatous polyposis coli, mutation or deletion of genes like p53 and K-ras. Therefore, many gene-therapy approaches like gene correction, virus-directed enzyme-prodrug therapy, immunogenetic manipulation and virotherapy are currently being explored. Development of novel strategies for the safe and effective delivery of drugs to the cancerous site is the need of the hour. This editorial accentuates different novel strategies with emphasis on gene therapy and immunotherapy for the management of CRC.

No abstract

Several studies have documented the role of hyper-activation of extracellular signal-regulated kinases (ERK) in Autism pathogenesis. Alpha-mangostin (AMG) is a phytoconstituents with anti-oxidants, anti-inflammatory, and ERK inhibition properties in many diseases. Our research aims to investigate the neuroprotective effect of AMG in the rat model of intracerebroventricular-propionic acid (ICV-PPA) induced autism with a confirmation of its effect on the ERK signaling. Autism was induced in Wistar rats (total 36 rats; 18 male/18 female) by multiple doses of PPA through ICV injection for 11 days. Actophotometer and beam walking tasks were used to evaluate animals' motor abilities, and the Morris water maze task was utilized to confirm the cognition and memory in animals. Long term administration of AMG 100 mg/kg and AMG 200mg/kg continued from day 12 to day 44 of the experiment. Before that, animals were sacrificed, brains isolated, morphological, gross pathological studies were performed, and neurochemical analysis was performed in the brain homogenates. Cellular and molecular markers, including ERK, myelin basic protein, apoptotic markers including caspase-3, Bax, Bcl-2, neuroinflammatory markers, neurotransmitters, and oxidative stress markers, have been tested throughout the brain. Thus, AMG reduces the overactivation of the ERK signaling and also restored autism-like behavioral and neurochemical alterations.

Skin is the largest external organ in the human body but its use for therapeutic purposes has been minimal. Stratum corneum residing on the uppermost layer of the skin provides a tough barrier to transport the drugs across the skin. Very small group of drugs sharing Lipinski properties, i.e. drugs having molecular weight not larger than 500 Da, having high lipophilicity and optimum polarity are fortunate enough to be used on skin therapeutics. But, at a time where modern therapeutics is slowly shifting from use of small molecular drugs towards the use of macromolecular therapeutic agents such as peptides, proteins and nucleotides in origin, skin therapeutics need to be evolved accordingly to cater the delivery of these agents. Physical technologies like iontophoresis, laser ablation, micro-needles and ultrasound, etc. have been introduced to enhance skin permeability. But their success is limited due to their complex working mechanisms and involvement of certain irreversible skin damage in some or other way. This review therefore explores the delivery strategies for transport of mainly peptide and protein drugs that do not involve any injuries (non-invasive) to the skin termed as passive delivery techniques. Chemical enhancers, nanocarriers, certain biological peptides and miscellaneous approaches like prodrugs are also thoroughly reviewed for their applications in protein delivery.

GSTM3 is involved in detoxification of carcinogens and may be important in modulating cancer susceptibility. GSTM3 genotype frequencies were determined in peripheral blood DNA of 149 esophageal cancer patients and 200 nonmalignant controls using the PCR followed by PAGE. Patients who were heterozygous carriers of GSTM3 AB genotype had an enhanced risk for developing esophageal cancer [odds ratio (OR), 2.1; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 1.1-3.7; P = 0.01]. In males, the risk due to GSTM3 AB genotype increased further (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.7-6.8; P = 0.000). Interaction of GSTM3 AB + BB and GSTM1 null genotypes marginally modulated risk (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1-3.7; P = 0.01). Association with histology (adenocarcinoma: OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.1-10.9; P = 0.03) and tumor site (middle third location: OR, 2.2; 95% CI, 1.1-4.4; P = 0.01; lower third location: OR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.2-5.6; P = 0.01) was also documented. Our results suggest that GSTM3 polymorphism may influence esophageal cancer susceptibility, in particular modulating the risk for adenocarcinoma histology and tumors of the mid and lower third region. (Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2007;16(1):178-81)

The study aimed at investigating whether genetic polymorphisms in BCL2, FAS, CCND1, EGF and EGFR genes influence the outcome of patients of esophageal squamous cell cancer treated with radiotherapy, with or without chemotherapy. Sixty nine histologically confirmed, previously untreated, patients with a squamous cell esophageal cancer were inducted into this study. Genotyping of BCL2 (ala43thr), FAS (A-670G), CCND1 (G870A), EGF (+61A/G) and EGFR (G497A) polymorphisms were determined using the polymerase chain reaction followed by restriction fragment length polymorphism methodology. Genotyped data was analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression statistical tests for predicting the survival outcome. Genotypes of BCL2, FAS, CCND1 and EGFR polymorphisms independently did not influence outcome significantly. However, patients with EGF +61AG genotype had median survival of 25.5 months (95% CI = 5.2-45.5), whereas those with EGF +61GG genotype had survival of only 3.7 months (95% CI = 0.0-9.8, p = 0.006). In univariate cox-regression analysis, interaction of genotypes EGF+61GG*radiotherapy tumor dose (< or =50 Gy) and EGF +61GG *upper third tumor location showed high hazard of death, 6.6 (95% CI = 2.0-21.5, p = 0.002) and 26.8 (95% CI = 3.7-194.2, p = 0.001) while EGF+61AG*middle third tumor location had reduced hazard 0.20 (95%CI = 0.06-0.60, p = 0.004). The pilot study suggests that EGF +61AG and +61GG genotypes may predict clinical outcome in esophageal cancer patients treated with radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. EGF +61AG genotype was associated with improved survival, however +61GG genotype adversely affected the outcome in patients particularly with upper third location of tumor and lower dose (< or =50) of radiotherapy.