The pelvic floor is a complex network formed by deep and superficial muscle structures, the vaginal wall and fascia that provides support to the pelvic organs and maintains continence. Changes in the urinary and muscular system during pregnancy cause pelvic floor muscle dysfunction and stress urinary incontinence (SUI). By strengthening these muscles, the symptoms of incontinence can be alleviated. The aim of this paper is to prove the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle strengthening exercises in the prevention and treatment of urinary incontinence in pregnant women through a systematic review of the available literature. Using the keywords "pelvic floor exercises", "urinary incontinence", "pregnancy", "prevention", "prenatal period" and "postnatal period", three independent authors searched database search engines (PubMed, Physiotherapy Evidence Database and Cochrane Library) for relevant articles from October 2021 to April 2022 using the predetermined criteria, and selected potential papers. The search resulted in 75 works. The papers older than five years, not available in full text, or not written in English were excluded. Ten works that met the criteria were included in the research. The selection was made by using the Jovell and Navarro-Rubio classification of study designs. The classified papers have provided evidence of the importance of prenatal exercises in improving pelvic floor muscle contractility. Structured, supervised training increases the strength of these muscles, reduces urinary symptoms and incontinence. The exercises to strengthen the muscles of the pelvic floor prevent incontinence, reduce the intensity of symptoms and improve the quality of life during pregnancy and postpartum. Health experts have a significant contribution in the education of pregnant women. It is a priority to develop standardized educational programs through which these exercises will be effectively applied.
Introduction: The most general definition of quality of life states that “quality of life is the degree of what makes life good.” Contemporary disability research increasingly relies on examining the quality of life of the whole family. Health and developmental outcomes are affected by the health of children and their environment. The objective of this study is to determine the difference in quality of life between families with children with disabilities and families with children without disabilities in the area of family health. Methods: The Family Quality of Life Questionnaire was used to assess quality of life. The test group consisted of 41 families of children with intellectual disabilities and developmental disabilities who use day care centers. The control group consisted of 69 families of children without disabilities whose members are employed in day care centers. Results: A statistically significant difference was found in the quality of life of families of children with disabilities and families of children without disabilities in the area of family health within the concept of satisfaction with family health (p = 0.0001), with respondents in the test group reporting a lower mean score of 3.1 ± 0.86 compared to subjects in the control group 3.94 ± 0.62. None of the respondents in the test group reported being very satisfied with family health, while for most respondents in both groups, 38 (92.8%) in the test group and 66 (95.7%) in the control group, family health was very important for quality of life. Conclusion: A statistically significant difference was found in the quality of life of families of children with disabilities and families of children without disabilities within the concept of achievement, the concept of satisfaction with family health and the determination is a statistically significant difference in relation to the existence of health services in the place of residence.
Introduction. Traumatic injury to the cervical segment of the spinal cord causes disability and quadriplegia. Upper extremity mobility and restoration of hand function for people with quadriplegia is a priority. With coordinated electrical stimulation of peripheral muscles and nerves, known as functional electrical stimulation (FES), this is possible. Upper limb stimulators are designed to increase the physical function and are controlled by users through preserved, uncoupled and limited voluntary movements. Aim. By reviewing the available literature, the aim of the paper was to prove the importance of FES in motor control and functional ability of the upper limbs of people with quadriplegia. Material and method. Using the keywords "quadriplegia", "FES", "upper extremity", "functional ability", "motor control" and "traumatic injury", the three authors searched the databases PubMed, EMBASE, SciELO, BMC, Academia according to pre-established criteria. Edu, Web of Science and Science & Technology (November 2021 - March 2022). Potential papers were selected using the Jovell and Navarro-Rubio classification of study design. Papers older than five years, papers that were not available in their entirety, or in English, were excluded. Fifty-seven papers were classified, and six were included in the research. Results. Functional electrical stimulators improved the functional ability of the upper extremities shortly after application. They cause neurophysiological changes in the central nervous system and cortical reorganization depending on the synchronization of the voluntary command and the successful execution of the planned task. Sensory stimulation is important in the preservation of neurological function because by synchronizing the voluntary command and successfully executing the planned task, neuroplasticity is stimulated. Conclusion. With the emergence of more research and analysis of the obtained results, we can expect the creation of new programs to improve the recovery process of the upper extremities, a greater degree of independence in daily life activities, and a better quality of life for people with quadriplegia.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.