There have been very few and limited cross-national comparisons concerning pain among residents of long-term care facilities in Europe. The aim of the present cross-sectional study has been to document the prevalence of pain, its frequency and severity as well as its correlates in three European countries: Finland (north), Italy (south) and the Netherlands (western central). Patients (aged 65years or above) were assessed with the Minimum Data Set 2.0 (MDS).The final sample comprised 5761 patients from 64 facilities in Finland, 2295 patients from 8 facilities in the Netherlands and 1959 patients from 31 facilities in Italy. The prevalence of pain - defined as any type of pain - varied between 32% in Italy, 43% in the Netherlands and 57% in Finland. In nearly 50% of cases, pain was present daily; there were no significant differences in pain prevalence between patients with cancer diagnosis and those with non-cancer diagnosis. Regardless of the different prevalence estimates, pain was moderate-to-severe in over 50% of cases in all the countries. In multivariate logistic regression models, clinical correlates of pain were substantially similar across countries: pain was positively correlated with more severe physical disability (ADL impairment), clinical depression and a diagnosis of osteoporosis. Pain was negatively correlated with a diagnosis of dementia and more severe degrees of cognitive deterioration. We conclude that pain is frequently encountered in long-term care facilities in Europe and that, despite cultural and case-mix differences, pain speaks one language.

Gender, age, living arrangements, and socioeconomic status are major determinants of institutional residence. Women and certain other population groups, e.g., those living alone, are likely to spend a longer time in institutional care because of higher rates of entry and lower rates of exit. These results have implications for the financing of long-term care and for targeting of interventions aimed at delaying it.

The study revisited the debate on the 'red herring" i.e. the claim that population aging will not have a significant impact on health care expenditure (HCE), using a Finnish data set. We decompose HCE into several components and include both survivors and deceased individuals into the analyses. We also compare the predictions of health expenditure based on a model that takes into account the proximity of death with the predictions of a naive model, which includes only age and gender and their interactions. We extend our analysis to include income as an explanatory variable. According to our results, total expenditure on health care and care of elderly people increases with age but the relationship is not as clear as is usually assumed when a naive model is used in health expenditure projections. Among individuals not in long-term care we found a clear positive relationship between expenditure and age only for health centre and psychiatric inpatient care. In somatic care and prescribed drugs, the expenditure clearly decreased with age among deceased individuals. Our results emphasise that even in the future, health care expenditure might be driven more by changes in the propensity to move into long-term care and medical technology than age and gender alone as often claimed in public discussion. Thus the future expenditure is more likely to be determined by health policy actions than inevitable trends in the demographic composition of the population.

Overall, these results show that the future demand for institutional care depends not only on the ageing of the population but also on the development of the prevalence and severity of chronic conditions associated with institutionalization.

The purpose of this study was to investigate health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and functional ability among the least dependent elderly in residential care, and to compare them with information on the general population. A stratified systematic sample (n = 1,587) was drawn from a one-day census of patients in all public residential homes in Finland on December 2, 1991. Sixty-nine per cent of residents in 1992 were able to participate (n = 1,097) and 86% of them returned the questionnaire (n = 948), of which n = 795 were acceptable, the response rate being 72%. A postal survey was used for data collection. The personnel of residential homes were allowed to help residents complete the questionnaire, and 90% of respondents received such help. HRQOL was measured by the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) and functional ability by a 14-item questionnaire. Finnish studies among the general population were used for comparisons. According to the NHP, the HRQOL appeared lower in institutional care and this was associated with the dependency level. Similarly, for most ADL items the general population had less restrictions than the least dependent residential care patients. In general, women expressed more difficulties in physical mobility and lack of energy than men. The longest stay elderly expressed better HRQOL. In multivariate models adjusted for age and gender those with poor vision had worse HRQOL in almost every dimension of NHP. Difficulties in speech were connected with emotional reactions and social isolation. Chronic illness limiting normal daily life predicted more problems in energy, pain, physical mobility, and emotional reactions. The married or widowed experienced less social isolation than single elderly. Higher education was related to better HRQOL in all NHP dimensions. Poorer perceived health was associated with lack of energy, pain, and emotional reactions. We conclude from these results that there are only a few clients in residential care whose HRQOL or functional ability compare with the non-institutionalized population.