Implementing agri-environmental schemes (AES) induces private and public transaction costs (TCs). To date, research has investigated TCs stemming from the relationship between (regional) administrations and farmers. However, implementing AES within the EU's Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) offers partial reimbursement of payments but implies an additional transaction and TCs. This paper investigates the effects of EU regulations on occurrence and composition of regional public TCs qualitatively by using Hesse, Germany, as a case study. Using insights from political science theories, I present results from interviews with administrative units: EU-required structural and procedural prerequisites shape the regional implementation and draw the focus towards expense of EU-based TCs. Moreover, there are spillovers onto farmers' TCs. Thus, the CAP framework is an important influencing factor, and resulting TCs may reduce the budgetary benefit obtained from the reimbursement.
Participating in agri-environmental schemes (AES) induces transaction costs for farmers, originating from time and money spent on tasks related to participation. High transaction costs may inhibit scheme participation, which would endanger the environmental goals aspired. To date, farmers' transaction costs have been investigated from a cost-minimising perspective, implying fixed gains from participation. Nonetheless, participation contracts may contain negotiable parts. In such a case, especially, cost-constituting tasks undertaken by farmers' own attempts could serve gain-maximising: Farmers can utilise additional information to increase their transactional gain, namely the payment. This paper addresses this question by investigating transaction costs of farmers participating in a site-specific grassland extensification scheme in Hesse, Germany, which contains negotiable features. Upon insights from information economics and transaction cost economics, the study discusses possible gains and tests the impact of farm and scheme-related features on both absolute and relative transaction costs, the latter conceptualised as payment/total transaction costs ratio. Results reveal that a higher transaction costs expense goes in line with a lower payment/transaction costs ratio; however, higher transaction costs expense predominates for particular farms features indicating dependency on AES income. Thus, voluntary transaction cost expenses seem to serve as a safeguard for securing participation-related income.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.