No abstract

BackgroundRoots are vital to plants for soil exploration and uptake of water and nutrients. Root performance is critical for growth and yield of plants, in particular when resources are limited. Since roots develop in strong interaction with the soil matrix, tools are required that can visualize and quantify root growth in opaque soil at best in 3D. Two modalities that are suited for such investigations are X-ray Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Due to the different physical principles they are based on, these modalities have their specific potentials and challenges for root phenotyping. We compared the two methods by imaging the same root systems grown in 3 different pot sizes with inner diameters of 34 mm, 56 mm or 81 mm.ResultsBoth methods successfully visualized roots of two weeks old bean plants in all three pot sizes. Similar root images and almost the same root length were obtained for roots grown in the small pot, while more root details showed up in the CT images compared to MRI. For the medium sized pot, MRI showed more roots and higher root lengths whereas at some spots thin roots were only found by CT and the high water content apparently affected CT more than MRI. For the large pot, MRI detected much more roots including some laterals than CT.ConclusionsBoth techniques performed equally well for pots with small diameters which are best suited to monitor root development of seedlings. To investigate specific root details or finely graduated root diameters of thin roots, CT was advantageous as it provided the higher spatial resolution. For larger pot diameters, MRI delivered higher fractions of the root systems than CT, most likely because of the strong root-to-soil contrast achievable by MRI. Since complementary information can be gathered with CT and MRI, a combination of the two modalities could open a whole range of additional possibilities like analysis of root system traits in different soil structures or under varying soil moisture.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13007-015-0060-z) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Integrative taxonomy is an approach for defining species and genera by taking phylogenetic, morphological, physiological, and ecological data into account. This approach is appropriate for microalgae, where morphological convergence and high levels of morphological plasticity complicate the application of the traditional classification. Although DNA barcode markers are well-established for animals, fungi, and higher plants, there is an ongoing discussion about suitable markers for microalgae and protists because these organisms are genetically more diverse compared to the former groups. To solve these problems, we assess the usage of a polyphasic approach combining phenotypic and genetic parameters for species and generic characterization. The application of barcode markers for database queries further allows conclusions about the ‘coverage’ of culture-based approaches in biodiversity studies and integrates additional aspects into modern taxonomic concepts. Although the culture-dependent approach revealed three new lineages, which are described as new species in this paper, the culture-independent analyses discovered additional putative new species. We evaluated three barcode markers (V4, V9 and ITS-2 regions, nuclear ribosomal operon) and studied the morphological and physiological plasticity of Coccomyxa, which became a model organism because its whole genome sequence has been published. In addition, several biotechnological patents have been registered for Coccomyxa. Coccomyxa representatives are distributed worldwide, are free-living or in symbioses, and colonize terrestrial and aquatic habitats. We investigated more than 40 strains and reviewed the biodiversity and biogeographical distribution of Coccomyxa species using DNA barcoding. The genus Coccomyxa formed a monophyletic group within the Trebouxiophyceae separated into seven independent phylogenetic lineages representing species. Summarizing, the combination of different characteristics in an integrative approach helps to evaluate environmental data and clearly identifies microalgae at generic and species levels.

"Why don't seaweeds spread beyond their present boundaries along an uninterrupted rocky coastline?", asked Breeman in 1988. Two principal aspects play a central role in shaping biogeographical distribution patterns: temperature-dependent effects on performance (e.g., growth, photosynthesis) and temperature tolerance (i.e., survival). The temperature responses of species are often correlated with the local thermal environments, i.e., species are locally adapted, but may vary seasonally or among populations or life stages due to phenotypic plasticity. Accordingly, it is necessary to differentiate three types of temperature responses: (1) genetic adaptation to local conditions, (2) phenotypic acclimation in response to variation of environmental conditions, and (3) short-term physiological regulation. The responses take place over different timescales: seconds to minutes (regulation), hours to days (acclimation), and up to thousands of millions of years (adaptation). This chapter reviews the temperature responses of seaweeds and their biogeographical implications. Local Temperature Adaptation of Growth and PhotosynthesisThe effect of temperature on performance traits, such as growth and photosynthesis, is typically visualized using temperature-response curves. Both growth and photosynthetic rates of seaweeds increase with temperature, plateau at a maximal level, A. Eggert (*)

The sensitivity to UV‐B radiation (UVBR: 280–315 nm) was tested for littoral (Palmaria palmata[L.] O. Kuntze, Chondrus crispus Stackhouse) and sublittoral (Phyllophora pseudoceranoides S. G. Gmelin, Rhodymenia pseudopalmata[Lamouroux] Silva, Phycodrys rubens[L.] Batt, Polyneura hilliae[Greville] Kylin) red macrophytes from Brittany, France. Algal fragments were subjected to daily repeated exposures of artificial UVBR that were realistic for springtime solar UVBR at the water surface in Brittany. Growth, DNA damage, photoinhibition, and UV‐absorbing compounds were monitored during 2 weeks of PAR + UV‐A radiation (UVAR) + UVBR, whereas PAR + UVAR and PAR treatments were used as controls. The littoral species showed a higher UV tolerance than the sublittoral species. After 2 weeks, growth of P. palmata and C. crispus was not significantly affected by UVBR, and DNA damage, measured as the number of cyclobutane‐pyrimidine dimers per 106 nucleotides, was negligible. Photoinhibition, determined as the decline in optimal quantum yield, was low and decreased during the course of the experiment, coinciding with the production of UV‐absorbing compounds in these species. In contrast, no UV‐absorbing compounds were induced in the sublittoral species. Growth rates of P. pseudoceranoides and R. pseudopalmata were reduced by 40% compared with the PAR treatment. Additionally, constant levels of DNA damage and pronounced photoinhibition were observed after the UVBR treatments. Growth was completely halted for Phycodrys rubens and Polyneura hilliae, whereas DNA damage accumulated in the course of the experiment. Because Phycodrys rubens and Polyneura hilliae showed the same degree of photoinhibition as the other sublittoral species, it appears that the accumulation of DNA damage may have been responsible for the complete inhibition of growth. The results suggest an important role of DNA repair pathways in determining the UV sensitivity in red macrophytes.