The L-QST can be a useful tool to quantify neuropathic pain. Further studies are needed to test inter-observer reliability and reproducibility of this tool. Antihistamines can be considered for treating persistent pain in breastfeeding women with a history of allergy or atopy, and beta-blockers may be helpful in women with multiple pain disorders.
Background: Studies have not found that hormonal contraceptive implants adversely affect breastfeeding, but theoretical concerns exist. Methods: We reported a case of reduced weight gain in an exclusively breastfed infant in association with placement of (ENG)-releasing contraceptive implant (Nexplanon) to the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS). We further queried reports to FAERS and reviewed published studies of the ENG implant during breastfeeding. Results: A breastfeeding mother received an ENG implant at 4 weeks postpartum. Her infant was exclusively breastfeeding. One month after implant placement, the infant had lost 145 g, dropping from the 44th percentile to the 6th percentile for growth. During this period, the mother had not returned to work or decreased frequency of feeding. During a 2-year period of FAERS reports, we found one other report of reduced milk supply following ENG implant placement. Among 108 breastfeeding women studied while using the ENG implant, there was one case of lactation failure. If this were not due to chance, the estimated risk of lactation failure with the ENG implant would be 0.9% (95% confidence interval 0.2-5.1%). Conclusion: Given uncertainty regarding the true effect of ENG implants on lactation, it seems prudent for providers to counsel each woman about a possible effect on milk supply so that she can monitor her infant for signs of impaired milk transfer. Patient-centered counseling approaches are needed that allow each woman to assess her own individual tolerance of risk of unplanned pregnancy versus possible risk of lactation failure.
Introduction: Provider counseling may influence women's postpartum family planning decisions. Materials and Methods: We conducted an anonymous Internet-based cross-sectional survey of postpartum women regarding multiple topics, including prenatal/postpartum care and family planning. We used multivariable logistic regression to determine associations between quantity of provider counseling (indexed as number of family planning topics discussed with a health care provider) and women's decisions regarding contraception and pregnancy spacing. Results: From January to May 2016, 2,850 women completed the survey and met inclusion criteria. Among this group, the majority were white (93%), ‡30 years (63%), and had obtained a college degree or higher (74%). Approximately half (49%) desired an interpregnancy interval (IPI) >2 years, and the minority (21%) used a highly effective contraceptive method (defined as long-acting reversible contraception or sterilization). The majority of women (56%) had received counseling on three to six family planning topics (defined as ''more counseling'' in regression models). Women who received more counseling were more likely to use a highly effective contraceptive method (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.33, confidence interval [95% CI] 1.09-1.62) but were not more likely to desire an IPI >2 years (AOR 0.96, 95% CI 0.81-1.14). Desired IPI modified the association between provider counseling and contraception ( p = 0.06 for interaction): Among those desiring an IPI >2 years, more counseling was associated with use of a highly effective contraceptive method (AOR 1.58, 95% CI 1.23-2.03), but this was not observed among those desiring a shorter IPI (AOR 1.05, 95% CI 0.73-1.49). Conclusions: Contraceptive decisions depend on both provider counseling and patient goals.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.