No abstract

Breast Cancer: Current ResearchBr ea s t C a n ce r: Curre nt R e se ar ch Khawaja et al., Breast Can Curr Res 2015, 1:1 Keywords: Breast conserving surgery; Oncoplastic breast surgery;Wide local excision; Breast cancer; Cosmesis IntroductionIn women with early stage unifocal breast cancer, breast conserving surgery followed by radiotherapy is the recommended choice. However, in some women, lesions are difficult to excise without the risk of cosmetic deformity or inadequate margin clearance. These women often present with large tumors in relatively small breasts requiring an excision of approximately 15% to 20% of the breast volume or more than 30% in large breasts. Another factor affecting poor cosmesis after breast conserving surgery is tumors located in aesthetically sensitive areas such as the central, medial, and inferior quadrants [1,2].In recent years, oncoplastic breast conserving surgery (OPS) has increased in popularity. OPS combines the principles of oncologic and plastic surgery techniques to gain oncologically and aesthetically pleasing results [3]. As these techniques become more accepted there is a demand for surgeons to become familiar with the indications and skills required to make oncoplastic surgery safe and effective [4].The choice between different oncoplastic techniques are determined mainly by the site of the tumor in the breast, tumor characteristics, extent of resection, breast characteristics (size, shape and glandular density), previous surgery, and the expectations and wishes of the patient [5].OPS can be classified into two main approaches according to the reconstruction technique used. Volume displacement techniques are applied to correct quadrantectomy defects in medium to large breasts [6]. They are of particular benefit to those patients who present with ptotic dense glandular breasts. The breast glandular tissue is advanced, rotated or transpositioned to fill the defect [7]. Since this may result in a smaller sized breast, contralateral surgery may be required. Conversely, AbstractBackground: The goal of breast conserving surgery is to achieve complete excision of the tumor with adequate surgical margins, while preserving the natural shape and appearance of the breast. This is a retrospective study which compared operative outcomes in oncoplastic (OPS; n=54) versus standard wide local excision (WLE; n=265) populations. A total of 319 consecutive patients were included in the study. The primary outcomes were the size of the tumor, weight of the specimen and margin clearance. The secondary outcomes were patient satisfaction, local recurrence rates and operative time.

Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women in the UK with well-defined algorithms of management in place in the western world. Squamous cell carcinoma of the breast is a rare entity and as such knowledge about the pathophysiology, treatment and prognosis are still uncertain. The report describes an unusual case of squamous cell carcinoma arising in an area of Zuska's disease of the breast. It illustrates the heterogeneity of the imaging findings with review of the literature. Decisions on management should be taken on an individual basis with full discussion in the multidisciplinary team meetings where all facets of the case are considered.

Introduction: The addition of adjuvant chemotherapy to hormonal therapy is recommended for patients with lymph node-positive (LN+ve), estrogen receptor positive (ER+), HER2-ve early breast cancer, despite the fact that many women will remain disease-free even if they do not receive chemotherapy. Therefore, a number of patients with LN+ EBC may be unnecessarily exposed to the toxicities of chemotherapy with no treatment benefit. In the UK, the Oncotype DX® Recurrence Score (RS) is recommended by NICE for routine testing in patients with ER+ HER2-ve, lymph node negative early stage breast cancer. Approximately 32% of newly diagnosed breast cancer patients will have lymph node involvement but do not have distant metastasis at the time of diagnosis. Objectives: Primary objective is to characterize how the results on the Oncotype DX® assay impact the decision-making process of physicians in the UK for women with ER+ HER2-ve EBC with 1-3 lymph nodes involved who are potential candidates for chemotherapy, but for whom the benefits may be uncertain. Secondary objectives include; (1) Assess the impact of the Oncotype DX RS in clinical practice in patients with 1-3 lymph nodes positive EBC, (2)Analyse distribution of RS and (3)Observe the percentage of patients not receiving chemotherapy as a result of the Oncotype DX RS. Methods: Postoperative patients with lymph node positive disease: N=720. Micrometastasis = 70patients, 1 Lymph Node Positive = 400patients, 2 Lymph Node Positive = 200patients & 3 Lymph Node Positive = 50patients (exploratory analysis). Study start date October 2017 to projected study end date of December 2021. INTERIM Results: To date, 194 patients have entered the Oncotype DX Node POS Study since October 2017 from 13 recruiting institutions across the UK. The nodal status is as follows; micrometastasis = 21patients (10%), 1 lymph node positive = 103 patients (53%), 2 lymph node positive = 53 patients (27%) and 3 lymph node positive =17 patients (9%). The average age of patient was 57.5years (range 27-79). Of 194 patients, 189 have received a recurrence score in the 1-3 lymph node positive setting. Average RS was 13.8 (range 0-63). Micrometastasis category received an average RS of 15, 1 LN+ve category received an average RS of 15.5, 2 LN+ve category received an average RS of 15.8 and 3 LN+ve category received an average RS of 20.8. Of 189 patients the decision to administer chemotherapy changed in 140 patients (74%) once the Oncotype DX score had been received. Decision to administer chemotherapy remained the same in 49 patients (26%). This shows that Oncotype DX greatly alters the decision-making process in patients with 1-3 LN+ve, despite the trial not setting a chemotherapy cut-off score. Those patients who received a recurrence score of 18 or below = 129 (68%). Patients who received a recurrence score of above 18 = 60 (32%). The largest nodal category (1 LN+ve) witnessed the highest rate of patients receiving a RS of below 18 (70%), followed by 2 LN+ve (66%) and 3 LN+ve (43%). One patient with 2 lymph nodes positive received a RS of zero. Weak correlation was observed between histopathological factors and recurrence score. Conclusion: Interim results show the use of the Oncotype DX assay in patients with 1-3 lymph node-positive (LN+ve), ER+ HER2-ve, EBC significantly alters the decision-making process in guiding use of chemotherapy. Result show that 74% of patients were spared chemotherapy where there was deemed to be no additional benefit over hormonal therapy alone. This resulted in 140 patients being spared the unnecessary side effects and exposure to toxicities of chemotherapy. This also prevented overtreatment of patients from a healthcare economic cost perspective. Citation Format: Daniel Thomas, William Maxwell, Caroline Archer, Anne Rigg, Tamas Hickish, Jo Dent, Laura Pettit, Marianne Dillon, Christy Goldsmith, Mark Verrill, Ludger Barthelmes, Saira Khawaja, Yousef Sharaiha, Mark Davies, Fawaz Arikat, Sahail Khan, Asma Munir, Anita Huws, Simon DavidHenry Holt. Impact of the Oncotype DX breast cancer assay on treatment decisions in a UK population of patients with oestrogen receptor positive early breast cancer with 1-3 lymph nodes positive who are candidates for chemotherapy, but for whom the benefits are uncertain - Interim results [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr OT3-17-03.

No abstract