Cadherins are essential cell adhesion molecules involved in tissue morphogenesis and the maintenance of tissue architecture in adults. The adhesion and selectivity functions of cadherins are located in their extracellular regions. Biophysical studies show that the adhesive activity is not confined to a single interface. Instead, multiple cadherin domains contribute to binding. By contrast, the specificity-determining site maps to the N-terminal domains, which adhere by the reciprocal binding of Trp2 residues from opposing proteins. Structural cooperativity can transmit the effects of subtle structural changes or ligand binding over large distances in the protein. Increasingly, studies show that differential cadherin-mediated adhesion, rather than exclusive homophilic binding between identical cadherins, direct cell segregation and the organization of tissue interfaces during morphogenesis. Force measurements quantified both kinetic and strength differences between different classical cadherins that may underlie cell sorting behavior. Despite the complex adhesion mechanisms and differences in binding properties, cadherin-mediated cell adhesion is also regulated by many other biochemical processes. Elucidating the mechanisms by which cadherins organize cell junctions and tissue architecture requires not only quantitative, mechanistic investigations of cadherin function but also investigations of the biochemical and cellular processes that can modulate those functions.

The mechanism that drives the segregation of cells into tissuespecific subpopulations during development is largely attributed to differences in intercellular adhesion. This process requires the cadherin family of calcium-dependent glycoproteins. A widely held view is that protein-level discrimination between different cadherins on cell surfaces drives this sorting process. Despite this postulated molecular selectivity, adhesion selectivity has not been quantitatively verified at the protein level. In this work, molecular force measurements and bead aggregation assays tested whether differences in cadherin bond strengths could account for cell sorting in vivo and in vitro. Studies were conducted with chicken N-cadherin, canine E-cadherin, and Xenopus C-cadherin. Both qualitative bead aggregation and quantitative force measurements show that the cadherins cross-react. Furthermore, heterophilic adhesion is not substantially weaker than homophilic adhesion, and the measured differences in adhesion do not correlate with cell sorting behavior. These results suggest that the basis for cell segregation during morphogenesis does not map exclusively to protein-level differences in cadherin adhesion.cell adhesion ͉ force probe ͉ selectivity ͉ surface forces apparatus B oth the formation of distinct tissues during morphogenesis and the maintenance of adult tissue structure are regulated by adhesive contacts between cells. One family of adhesion proteins, cadherins, is critical to several processes associated with the formation and maintenance of tissues. The genetic regulation of the spatiotemporal expression patterns of cadherins in vivo is believed to play a central role in embryogenesis, cell differentiation, and the maintenance of the multicellular structure of an organism (1-5). One prevalent hypothesis is that differences in adhesion between cells direct cell segregation during morphogenesis, analogous to liquid-liquid phase separation (6). A fundamental unresolved question is whether this sorting out is encoded by protein-specific or cell-specific differences in adhesion. A common hypothesis is that preferential binding between identical cadherins (homophilic) relative to heterophilic binding between dissimilar cadherins induces the cell segregation.Both the adhesive and the selectivity functions of classic cadherins map to the extracellular (EC) region (7), which comprises five tandemly arranged EC domains, EC1-5, numbered from the outermost domain (Fig. 1) (8). Classical cadherins also contain a transmembrane segment and a cytoplasmic domain. Cadherins form multiple bonds that require different EC domains (9-12). A common feature of the classical cadherins is that the N-terminal domains bind by inserting the tryptophan 2 (W2) residue from one protein into a hydrophobic pocket on an opposed N-terminal domain (13-16). However, given the weak adhesion between the outer domains (11, 12), it is questionable whether the tryptophan binding accounts for both cadherin selectivity and robust adhesion.The most extensively ci...

This work describes quantitative force and bead aggregation measurements of the adhesion and binding mechanisms of canine E-cadherin mutants W2A, D134A, D103A, D216A, D325A, and D436A. The W2A mutation affects the formation of the N-terminal strand dimer, and the remaining mutations target calcium binding sites at the interdomain junctions. Surface force measurements show that the full ectodomain of canine E-cadherin forms two bound states that span two intermembrane gap distances. The outer bond coincides with adhesion between the N-terminal extracellular domains (EC1) and the inner bond corresponds to adhesion via extracellular domain 3 (EC3). The W2A, D103A, D134A, and D216A mutations all eliminated adhesion between the N-terminal domains, and they attenuated or nearly eliminated the inner bond. The W2A mutant, which does not destabilize the protein structure, attenuates binding via EC3, which is separated from the mutation by several hundred amino acids. This long-range effect suggests that the presence or absence of tryptophan-2 docking allosterically alters the adhesive function of distal sites on the protein. This finding appears to reconcile the multidomain binding mechanism with mutagenesis studies, which suggested that W2 is the sole binding interface. The effects of the calcium site mutations indicate that structural perturbations cooperatively impact large regions of the protein structure. However, the influence of the calcium sites on cadherin structure and function depends on their location in the protein.

This work describes the genetic engineering and characterization of a histidine-tagged fragment of protein A. The histidine tag results in the site-selective immobilization of the protein A receptor and the preservation of its high ligand affinity when immobilized on solid supports. The fragment was expressed at high yield in E. coli and purified to homogeneity. When selectively immobilized to histidine binding matrices, the protein A fragment exhibits high affinity for soluble IgG. We further demonstrate from adsorption isotherms that the receptor exhibits a homogeneous, high affinity population at densities where steric crowding between large ligands does not affect the apparent receptor affinity. This engineered receptor is appropriate for a range of applications including sensor design or those using immobilized Fc-tagged proteins.

Cells continuously probe their environment with membrane receptors, achieving subsecond adaptation of their behaviour [Diez, G., Gerisch, G., Anderson, K., Müller-Taubenberger, A. and Bretschneider, T. (2006) Subsecond reorganization of the actin network in cell motility and chemotaxis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 7601-7606, Shamri, R., Grabovsky, V., Gauguet, J.M., Feigelson, S., Manevich, E., Kolanus, W., Robinson, M.K., Staunton, D.E., von Andrian, U.H. and Alon, R. (2005) Lymphocyte arrest requires instantaneous induction of an extended LFA-1 conformation mediated by endothelium-bound chemokines. Nat. Immunol. 6, 497-606, Jiang, G., Huang, A.H., Cai, Y., Tanase, M. and Sheetz, M.P. (2006) Rigidity sensing at the leading edge through alpha(V)beta(3) integrins and RPTPalpha. Biophys. J. 90, 1804-2006]. Recently, several receptors, including cadherins, were found to bind ligands with a lifetime of order of one second. Here we show at the single molecule level that homotypic C-cadherin association involves transient intermediates lasting less than a few tens of milliseconds. Further, these intermediates transitionned towards more stable states with a kinetic rate displaying exponential decrease with piconewton forces. These features enable cells to detect ligands or measure surrounding mechanical behaviour within a fraction of a second, much more rapidly than was previously thought.