Benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P), a known environmental pollutant and tobacco smoke carcinogen, is metabolically activated to highly tumorigenic B[a]P diol epoxide derivatives that predominantly form N(2)-guanine adducts in cellular DNA. Although nucleotide excision repair (NER) is an important cellular defense mechanism, the molecular basis of recognition of these bulky lesions is poorly understood. In order to investigate the effects of DNA adduct structure on NER, three stereoisomeric and conformationally different B[a]P-N(2)-dG lesions were site specifically incorporated into identical 135-mer duplexes and their response to purified NER factors was investigated. Using a permanganate footprinting assay, the NER lesion recognition factor XPC/HR23B exhibits, in each case, remarkably different patterns of helix opening that is also markedly distinct in the case of an intra-strand crosslinked cisplatin adduct. The different extents of helix distortions, as well as differences in the overall binding of XPC/HR23B to double-stranded DNA containing either of the three stereoisomeric B[a]P-N(2)-dG lesions, are correlated with dual incisions catalyzed by a reconstituted incision system of six purified NER factors, and by the full NER apparatus in cell-free nuclear extracts.

In response to genotoxic attacks, cells activate sophisticated DNA repair pathways such as nucleotide excision repair (NER), which consists of damage removal via dual incision and DNA resynthesis. Using permanganate footprinting as well as highly purified factors, we show that NER is a dynamic process that takes place in a number of successive steps during which the DNA is remodeled around the lesion in response to the various NER factors. XPC/HR23B first recognizes the damaged structure and initiates the opening of the helix from position ؊3 to ؉6. TFIIH is then recruited and, in the presence of ATP, extends the opening from position ؊6 to ؉6; it also displaces XPC downstream from the lesion, thereby providing the topological structure for recruiting XPA and RPA, which will enlarge the opening. Once targeted by XPG, the damaged DNA is further melted from position ؊19 to ؉8. XPG and XPF/ERCC1 endonucleases then cut the damaged DNA at the limit of the opened structure that was previously "labeled" by the positioning of XPC/HR23B and TFIIH.To counteract the detrimental effect of genotoxic attacks, cells activate sophisticated and specific DNA repair pathways. Damage induced by UV radiation, environmental agents, and anticancer drugs are removed by two distinct nucleotide excision repair (NER) 1 subpathways, namely global genome repair (GGR), which eliminates lesions from the entire genome, and transcription-coupled repair (TCR), a specialized pathway that repairs damages on a transcribed strand of active genes (1-3). Human NER involves the ordered action of factors in dual incision and DNA repair resynthesis steps (4). Any mutation that affects either the enzymatic activity or the ordered assembly of the dual incision complex leads to genetic disorders such as xeroderma pigmentosum, trichothiodystrophy, or Cockayne syndrome (5, 6).In global genome repair, the dual incision is a multistep process that results from the coordinated action of XPC/ HR23B, TFIIH, XPA, RPA, XPG, and XPF/ERCC1, resulting in the removal of the damaged oligonucleotide (4, 7, 8). After being recognized by the XPC/HR23B complex, the damaged DNA structure is targeted by TFIIH, which recruits the other factors upon the addition of ATP (9 -11). The unwound DNA is then incised by the two endonucleases XPG and XPF/ERCC1 on the 3Ј and 5Ј side of the lesion, respectively (12-15), leaving a gap structure that is filled up by the DNA polymerase ⑀ or ␦ and the accompanying factors PCNA, RF-C, RPA, and DNA ligase I (16). Whether or not the NER reaction occurs by sequential arrival of the various factors or by a pre-assembled complex referred to as the repairosome or the holoenzyme is still under debate (17)(18)(19). Although the hypothesis of the sequential assembly, which has gained a lot of support from recent biological studies, seems to be more accepted, the order of assembly of the NER factors on the damaged DNA and their contribution to the DNA remodeling to allow the repair are not fully understood (10,20,21). As an example, to further learn abou...

Genetic evidence suggests that the Bacillus subtilis lrpC gene product participates in cell growth and sporulation. The purified LrpC protein, which has a predicted molecular mass of 16.4 kDa, is a tetramer in solution. LrpC binds with higher affinity ( K (app) approximately 80 nM) to intrinsically curved DNA than to non-curved DNA ( K (app) approximately 700 nM). DNase I footprinting and the supercoiling of relaxed circular plasmid DNA in the presence of topoisomerase I revealed that LrpC induces DNA bending and constrains DNA supercoils in vitro. The LrpC protein cooperatively increases DNA binding of the bona fide DNA-binding and DNA-bending protein Hbsu. LrpC forms inter- and intramolecular bridges on linear and supercoiled DNA molecules, resulting in a large network and DNA compactation. Collectively, these findings suggest that LrpC is an architectural protein and that its activities could provide a means to modulate DNA transactions.

Gel-mobility shift assays with crude cell extracts of Rhodobacter sphaeroides, which belongs to the alpha group of the proteobacteria, have shown that a protein binds to the promoter of its recA gene, resulting in two retardation bands. Analysis of the minimal region of the R. sphaeroides recA gene required for the formation of the DNA-protein complexes, revealed the presence of the motifs GTTCN7GATC and GAACN7GAAC, which are centred at positions -21 and +8 from the transcriptional starting point respectively. Using PCR mutagenesis, we have demonstrated that these two motifs are required for the formation of both DNA-protein complexes in vitro as well as for the DNA damage-mediated inducibility of the recA gene in vivo. Furthermore, the level of the recA gene expression in the constitutive mutants is the same as that achieved by the wild-type cells after DNA damage, indicating that the binding protein must be a repressor. The motif GTTCN7GTTC is also present upstream of the R. sphaeroides uvrA promoter, which in vitro specifically binds to a protein and whose expression is DNA damage inducible. Mutagenesis of this motif abolishes both the binding of this protein to the uvrA promoter and the DNA damage-mediated expression of this gene. The fact that the recA and uvrA wild-type promoters compete with each other for the retardation band formation, but not with their mutant derivatives in any of these motifs, indicates that the same repressor binds to the operator of both genes. All these results lead us to propose the sequence GTTCN7GTTC as the SOS box of R. sphaeroides. This is the first SOS box known whose sequence is a direct repeat and not a palindrome.

The recently discovered hyperthermophilic and radioresistant archaeon Thermococcus gammatolerans is of great interest to compare and contrast the impact of its physiology on radioresistance and its ability to repair damaged chromosomes after exposure to gamma irradiation with radioresistant bacteria. We showed that, in contrast to other organisms, cell survival was not modified by the cellular growth phase under optimal growth conditions but nutrient-limited conditions did affect the T. gammatolerans radioresistance. We determined the first kinetics of damaged DNA recovery in an archaeon after exposure to massive doses of gamma irradiation and compared the efficiency of chromosomal DNA repair according to the cellular growth phase, nutrient availability and culture conditions. Chromosomal DNA repair kinetics showed that stationary phase cells reconstitute disrupted chromosomes more rapidly than exponential phase cells. Our data also revealed that this radioresistant archaeon was proficient to reconstitute shattered chromosomes either slowly or rapidly without any loss of viability. These results suggest that rapid DNA repair is not required for the extreme radioresistance of T. gammatolerans.

The Sinorhizobium meliloti uvrA gene was isolated by complementation of a Rhodobacter sphaeroides UvrA- mutant. DNA sequencing of the region upstream of the S. meliloti uvrA gene reveals the presence of the ssb gene in the opposite transcriptional orientation. PCR-mediated mutagenesis demonstrated that expression of these two genes is inducible by DNA damage, and depends, in both cases, on the direct repeat GTTCN7GTTC (cited according to the direction of uvrA transcription). Comparison of the sequences of recA and uvrA promoters from different bacterial species of the alpha group of the Proteobacteria has identified the direct repeat GTTCYYKTTTTGTTC as the SOS box in this phylogenetic group.

Transcription of the Rhodobacter sphaeroides recA promoter (P(recA)) is induced upon DNA damage in a lexA-dependent manner. In vivo experiments demonstrate that LexA protein represses and might also activate transcription of P(recA). Purified R.sphaeroides LexA protein specifically binds the SOS boxes located within the P(recA) region. In vitro transcription analysis, using Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP), indicated that the presence of LexA may stimulate and repress transcription of P(recA). EMSA and DNase I footprinting experiments show that LexA and RNAP can bind simultaneously to P(recA). At low LexA concentrations it enhances RNAP binding to P(recA), stimulates open complex formation and strand separation beyond the transcription start site. At high LexA concentrations, however, RNAP-promoted strand separation is not observed beyond the +5 region. LexA might repress transcription by interfering with the clearance process instead of blocking the access of RNAP to the promoter region. Based on these findings we propose that the R.sphaeroides LexA protein performs fine tuning of the SOS response, which might provide a physiological advantage by enhancing transcription of SOS genes and delaying full activation of the response.

The recA genes of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, Rhizobium meliloti, Rhizobium phaseoli and Rhodobacter sphaeroides, species belonging to the alpha-group bacteria of the Proteobacteria class, have been fused in vitro to the lacZ gene of Escherichia coli. By using a mini-Tn5 transposon derivative, each of these recA-lacZ fusions was introduced into the chromosome of each of the four species, and into that of E. coli. The recA genes of three of the alpha bacteria are induced by DNA damage when inserted in A. tumefaciens, R. phaseoli or R. meliloti chromosomes. The expression of the recA gene of R. sphaeroides is DNA damage-mediated only when present in its own chromosome; none of the genes is induced in E. coli. Likewise, the recA gene of E. coli is not induced in any of the four alpha species. These data indicate that A. tumefaciens, R. meliloti and R. phaseoli possess a LexA-like repressor, which is able to block the expression of their recA genes, as well as that of R. sphaeroides, but not the recA gene of E. coli. The LexA repressor of R. sphaeroides does not repress the recA gene of A. tumefaciens, R. meliloti, R. phaseoli or E. coli.