The role of hospital staff in the organ procurement process is crucial. Nevertheless, there is little literature about their attitudes toward donation. The Donor Action Hospital Attitude Survey (HAS) comprises a series of questions to assess hospital staff's attitudes, beliefs, and knowledge on organ donation and transplantation. Further analysis of the data will help identify any weak areas in the staff viewpoint and information, highlight potential needs for more education on specific issues, and establish a baseline to monitor future improvements. We used the Donor Action HAS in the Emilia-Romagna region, Italy.
1. Involvement in donation process during the past year: 1.24 /3, 2. Attitudes to organ donation (OD): 2.51 /3, 3. Skills / Self-confidence in donation practices: 1.36 /3, 4. Satisfaction with local transplant coordinator (TC) services: 2.31 /3. The attitude towards organ donation was positive, 1386 respondents support organ donation. A high percentage (93.6 % of respondents) is of the opinion that transplantation helps save other people's lives. Most uncertainty arises on the question whether donation helps families with grief. It is remarkable that only 53 % of those prepared to donate organs have informed the family of their wish. Many respondents do not feel comfortable performing key tasks close to donation. Major difficulties were observed in explaining to a family the concept of brain death (0.98 /3). Knowledge on the concept of brain-death was one of the most requested subjects for improvement. Emilia-Romagna is the region with one of the highest donation rates in Italy (29.9 pmp in 2000). Nevertheless, more profound knowledge of the local situation could help further improve donation.
Background: In the last years, there have been increasing concerns about the safety and traceability of human tissues and cells in Europe. In order to regulate this part of medical practice, the European Commission issued 3 directives between 2004 and 2006 and endorsed EUROCET to support member states in fulfilling some of their obligations. Methods: EUROCET created a connection with the European Union (EU) Competent Authorities (CAs) and set up a website where lists of the CAs, the authorized Tissue Establishments (TEs) and the activity data are published and updated. Moreover, EUROCET is involved within the Vigilance and Surveillance of Substances of Human Origin (SOHO V&S) project, aiming to support the EU member states in the establishment of vigilance and surveillance systems for tissues and cells. EUROCET is also working with EU stakeholders to develop a common coding system concerning donation and products. Results: There are 33 countries in EUROCET and 57 CAs. 3,974 TEs are recorded: 1,108 for tissues, 1,480 for haematopoietic progenitor cells and 1,386 for assisted reproduction. On the website, it is possible to find the 2010 activity data report. Conclusion: Based on its cooperation with the CAs, EUROCET represents them in the European network. Nowadays, the EU member states can rely on a web portal and database in order to put the tissue and cell directives into practice.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.