Background The development of applications using nanomaterials is accompanied by safety concerns due to gaps in understanding the toxicology. In case of incorporation in food contact polymers, the first step to consumer exposure is the transfer of nanomaterials from the polymer to the food. Thus, in order to evaluate the risk the key questions are whether nanoparticles can be released from food contact polymers and under which conditions. Scope and Approach This article critically reviews the published nanomaterial migration studies which are partly contradictory. The influence of analytical techniques and the experimental design on the results are discussed. Theoretical approaches by mathematical modelling are addressed. Furthermore, a short overview on nanomaterial applications for food contact materials and on the regulatory situation in Europe and USA is given. Key findings and conclusions Distinguishing between particle release and migration of dissolved ions is crucial for proper interpretation of migration results. Nanosilver which is the mostly investigated species, and other metals are easily oxidized to ions but can re-form nanoparticles at slightly reductive conditions, e.g. at sample preparation, pretending particle migration. At cutting edges the particles may be released due to weak binding to the surface. Nanoparticles which are completely encapsulated in the host polymer matrix do not have a potential to migrate into food. Thus, consumers will not be exposed to nanoparticles from food contact polymers when those are completely embedded in polymer and the contact surface is not altered by mechanical surface stress during application
Development and market introduction of new nanomaterials trigger the need for an adequate risk assessment of such products alongside suitable risk communication measures. Current application of classical and new nanomaterials is analyzed in context of regulatory requirements and standardization for chemicals, food and consumer products. The challenges of nanomaterial characterization as the main bottleneck of risk assessment and regulation are presented. In some areas, e.g., quantification of nanomaterials within complex matrices, the establishment and adaptation of analytical techniques such as laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry and others are potentially suited to meet the requirements. As an example, we here provide an approach for the reliable characterization of human exposure to nanomaterials resulting from food packaging. Furthermore, results of nanomaterial toxicity and ecotoxicity testing are discussed, with concluding key criteria such as solubility and fiber rigidity as important parameters to be considered in material development and regulation. Although an analysis of the public opinion has revealed a distinguished rating depending on the particular field of application, a rather positive perception of nanotechnology could be ascertained for the German public in general. An improvement of material characterization in both toxicological testing as well as end-product control was concluded as being the main obstacle to ensure not only safe use of materials, but also wide acceptance of this and any novel technology in the general public.
A wide variety of adhesives can be used to manufacture multilayer food packaging materials. Since these materials are usually in direct contact with the packed food, compounds from the adhesive may migrate into it. Therefore it is important to determine the composition of the adhesives used. The main aims of this work were to determine the compounds present in the adhesives used in the food packaging, to study their migration to food simulants and finally to use these data to test a mathematical tool designed for predicting migration to food from laminates containing adhesives. For this purpose a total of 45 market samples of multilayer materials (laminates and other glued materials) produced with 29 different adhesives were studied. A total of 55 different compounds were detected in these adhesives, 57% of these compounds migrated into a dry food simulant (Tenax®) through the food contact layer. These data were also used to compare it with the theoretically estimated migration of the adhesive compounds using "upper-bound reference" values for the diffusion and partition coefficients implied in a multilayer migration model. In 93% of the cases the estimated migration results met or exceeded the experimental ones. This is an important requirement for testing the applicability of these theoretical migration estimations for compliance decisions which aim to protect the consumer's health
Carbon black was investigated to assess and quantify the possibility that nanoparticles might migrate out of plastic materials used in the food packaging industry. Two types of carbon black were incorporated in low-density polyethylene (LDPE) and polystyrene (PS) at 2.5% and 5.0% loading (w/w), and then subjected to migration studies. The samples were exposed to different food simulants according to European Union Plastics Regulation 10/2011, simulating long-term storage with aqueous and fatty foodstuffs. Asymmetric flow field-flow fractionation (AF4) coupled to a multi-angle laser light-scattering (MALLS) detector was used to separate, characterise and quantify the potential release of nanoparticles. The AF4 method was successful in differentiating carbon black from other matrix components, such as extracted polymer chains, in the migration solution. At a detection limit of 12 µg kg−1, carbon black did not migrate from the packaging material into food simulants. The experimental findings are in agreement with theoretical considerations based on migration modelling. From both the experimental findings and theoretical considerations, it can be concluded that carbon black does not migrate into food once it is incorporated into a plastics food contact material.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.