Background. Cutaneous malignant melanoma (CMM) is a heterogeneous disease, acknowledged for its lack of predictability regarding clinical evolution. In order to appreciate a patient's individual prognosis, an attempt is made to find new tumor markers that parallel the disease progression. Objective. To identify if melanoma inhibitory activity (MIA) protein could represent a tool for selecting high risk early stages melanoma patients. Method. Between 2008 and 2013, 155 patients with CMM were treated in our clinic. 84 of them were classified into stages I and II, according to TNM 2009. MIA serum concentration was measured in all patients and 50 healthy donors. A cut-off value of 9.4 ng/ml was established using the ROC curve. Results. All patients were followed up by periodic investigations every 6 months. We have noticed that 66% of patients with MIA serum values at diagnosis greater than 9.4 ng/mL have relapsed, while only 5% of patients with MIA serum concentration below the estimated threshold, recurred during the follow-up period (P = 0.000). The death risk was 12 times higher in pathological MIA group of patients (P = 0.0001). Conclusions. Our data suggest that MIA is an independent prognostic factor for patients with localized CMM.

Cervical cancer is one of the most common cancers in women in developing countries, second only to breast cancer, with more than 450.000 new cases every year. Romania has the highest incidence of cervical cancer in Europe; more than four times the incidence found in Western Europe. Radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy is considered in most countries the gold standard for locally advanced cervical cancer. In Romania, if downstaging occurs after radiotherapy, adjuvant surgery is routinely performed. Thus, in the present study, we investigated the rate of residual cancer in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer who underwent surgery after concurrent chemoradiotherapy and to determine the impact of tumor histological subtype on the chemoradiotherapy response. Of a total of 461 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer that underwent chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant surgery, 254 had a partial response defined as the presence of residual tumor at pathology examination. Depending on the histological subtype of the cervical cancer, partial response was obtained in 50.6% of squamous cell carcinoma cases and in 77.6% of adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma cases. The present study demonstrated that cervical cancer patients with adenocarcinomas and adenosquamous carcinomas had a significantly poorer treatment response to chemoradiotherapy than those with squamous cell carcinomas. We consider that in such cases where residual tumor is present, adjuvant surgery is mandatory for improving the survival rates.

RezumatRecidiva în cancerul mamar reprezintã o provocare pentru clinician din cauza tratamentului nestandardizat şi necesitã de obicei o abordare multidisciplinarã. Aceasta este cheia pentru un control bun al bolii pe termen lung şi pentru un tratament cu intenţie curativã. Recidiva localã în cancerul mamar poate apãrea dupã tratamentul chirurgical conservator sau dupã mastectomie iar recidiva regionalã implicã limfonodulii ipsilaterali axilari, mamari interni sau supraclaviculari. Prognosticul recidivei locale dupã tratamentul chirurgical conservator pare sã fie mai bun decât dupã mastectomie în termenii apariţiei metastazelor la distanţã şi a supravieţuirii globale. De asemenea, prognosticul recidivei axilare este mai bun decât cel al recidivei supraclaviculare sau mamare interne. Recidiva locoregionalã în cancerul mamar reprezintã mai degrabã un marker al apariţiei metastazelor decât un factor determinant al acestora. Opţiunile terapeutice pentru recidiva loco-regionalã în cancerul de sân impun decizii multidisciplinare şi din acest motiv este foarte importantã comisia oncologicã multidisciplinarã. Fiecare pacient trebuie sa primeascã cel mai bun tratament oncologic personalizat. Review Article a multidisciplinary approach. This is the key for a good long term disease control and for a management with curative intent. The local recurrence in breast cancer appears after breast conserving treatment (BCT) or after mastectomy, and the regional recurrence involves the ipsilateral axillary, internal mammary or supraclavicular lymph nodes. Local recurrence prognosis after BCT seems to be better than after mastectomy regarding distant metastases occurrence and overall survival. Prognosis of axillary recurrence is better than prognosis of supraclavicular and internal mammary recurrence. Locoregional recurrence in breast cancer represents rather a marker for the appearance of distant metastases than a determinant factor for them. Management options for locoregional recurrence of cancer require multidisciplinary input decision making and for this reason the multidisciplinary tumor-board (MTD) is very important. Each patient should receive the best individualized oncologic treatment.

Table of contentsMELANOMA BRIDGE 2015KEYNOTE SPEAKER PRESENTATIONSMolecular and immuno-advancesK1 Immunologic and metabolic consequences of PI3K/AKT/mTOR activation in melanomaVashisht G. Y. Nanda, Weiyi Peng, Patrick Hwu, Michael A. DaviesK2 Non-mutational adaptive changes in melanoma cells exposed to BRAF and MEK inhibitors help the establishment of drug resistanceGennaro Ciliberto, Luigi Fattore, Debora Malpicci, Luigi Aurisicchio, Paolo Antonio Ascierto, Carlo M. Croce, Rita ManciniK3 Tumor-intrinsic beta-catenin signaling mediates tumor-immune avoidanceStefani Spranger, Thomas F. GajewskiK4 Intracellular tumor antigens as a source of targets of antibody-based immunotherapy of melanomaYangyang Wang, Soldano FerroneCombination therapiesK5 Harnessing radiotherapy to improve responses to immunotherapy in cancerClaire Vanpouille-Box, Erik Wennerberg, Karsten A. Pilones, Silvia C. Formenti, Sandra DemariaK6 Creating a T cell-inflamed tumor microenvironment overcomes resistance to checkpoint blockadeHaidong Tang, Yang Wang, Yang-Xin FuK7 Biomarkers for treatment decisions?Reinhard DummerK8 Combining oncolytic therapies in the era of checkpoint inhibitorsIgor PuzanovK9 Immune checkpoint blockade for melanoma: should we combine or sequence ipilimumab and PD-1 antibody therapy?Michael A. PostowNews in immunotherapyK10 An update on adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapy for melanomAhmad TarhiniK11 Targeting multiple inhibitory receptors in melanomaJoe-Marc Chauvin, Ornella Pagliano, Julien Fourcade, Zhaojun Sun, Hong Wang, Cindy Sanders, John M. Kirkwood, Tseng-hui Timothy Chen, Mark Maurer, Alan J. Korman, Hassane M. ZarourK12 Improving adoptive immune therapy using genetically engineered T cellsDavid F. StroncekTumor microenvironment and biomarkersK13 Myeloid cells and tumor exosomes: a crosstalk for assessing immunosuppression?Veronica Huber, Licia RivoltiniK14 Update on the SITC biomarker taskforce: progress and challengesMagdalena ThurinWorld-wide immunoscore task force: an updateK15 The immunoscore in colorectal cancer highlights the importance of digital scoring systems in surgical pathologyTilman Rau, Alessandro LugliK16 The immunoscore: toward an integrated immunomonitoring from the diagnosis to the follow up of cancer’s patientsFranck PagèsEconomic sustainability of melanoma treatments: regulatory, health technology assessment and market access issuesK17 Nivolumab, the regulatory experience in immunotherapyJorge Camarero, Arantxa SanchoK18 Evidence to optimize access for immunotherapiesClaudio JommiORAL PRESENTATIONSMolecular and immuno-advancesO1 Ipilimumab treatment results in CD4 T cell activation that is concomitant with a reduction in Tregs and MDSCsYago Pico de Coaña, Maria Wolodarski, Yuya Yoshimoto, Giusy Gentilcore, Isabel Poschke, Giuseppe V. Masucci, Johan Hansson, Rolf KiesslingO2 Evaluation of prognostic and therapeutic potential of COX-2 and PD-L1 in primary and metastatic melanomaGiosuè Scognamiglio, Francesco Sabbatino, Federica Zito Marino, Anna Maria Anniciello, Monica Cantile, Margherita Cerrone,...

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract