No abstract

Summary:In the bone marrow transplant setting, several authors hypothesized that severely overweight patients are at increased risk of transplant-related toxicity, but different definitions of obesity, different body weight groupings and heterogeneous samples of patients were analyzed. To overcome these limitations, we retrospectively considered a homogeneous group of 54 patients (median age 36.5 years), with a diagnosis of de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML), autografted in first complete remission (CR) with the Bu-Cy2 conditioning regimen, dosed on actual body weight. Patients were classified into three groups (obese, non-obese, underweight) using body mass index (BMI = kg/m 2 ); for each group we analyzed transplant-related toxicity and mortality, overall survival and disease-free survival (OS/DFS). In spite of the relatively small number of patients, in our results high BMI appears a predictive factor for an increase of treatment-related toxicity and mortality. Moreover, 30 (55%) patients are currently alive in continuous CR, and after a median follow-up of 76.5 months (range 14-137) statistically significant differences in OS and DFS were detected between obese and non-obese groups (P = 0.012 and 0.021, respectively). Our study sugggests that obesity may represent an independent risk factor for autograft in AML and further investigations are warranted. Bone Marrow Transplantation (2001) 28, [365][366][367]

No abstract

Introduction: Magnetic Resonance-guided Radiation Therapy (MRgRT) allows online adaptations (OA) of the treatment plan to optimize daily dose distribution based on patient's anatomy, just before fraction delivery. The aim of this study is to evaluate feasibility and the dosimetric improvement of the OA workflow implemented in our institution for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) patients, in terms of target coverage and organs at risk (OARs) sparing. Methods: We retrospectively analysed 8 LAPC patients treated with MRgRT in combination with the OA approach, using video-assisted inspiratory breath-hold for a total of 38 fractions with a dose ranging from 30 Gy to 40 Gy in 5 fractions. Dose distribution of the baseline plan was first calculated based on daily anatomy, obtaining a ''predicted" plan to assess the dosimetric improvement. If the dose distribution did not meet the constraints set in the planning phase, PTV, GTV and OARs were re-contoured within a distance of 3 cm from the PTV external edge and a new online ''adaptive" plan was generated. Other clinical and planning parameters were also evaluated to assess the feasibility and the dosimetic benefit of the online adaptive workflow. Results: Out of 38 total fractions, 26 (68.4%) were adapted online and 12 (31.6%) were delivered using the baseline plan. The use of the adaptive workflow resulted to be feasible in our clinical practice and advantageous in all the patients: mean PTV V95% increased by 10.8% (5.7-20.8) while mean CTV V98% of 12.6% (7.3-17.7). Also OARs V33 and V25 showed a positive trend avoiding unnecessary irradiation. Conclusion: OA workflow improves the dosimetric benefit of MRgRT, preventing the occurrence of highdoses to OARs and increasing the safety of stereotactic treatment for LAPC, without any drawback for our daily clinical practice routine.