The basis for the endothelial cell-restricted expression of endothelial nitric-oxide synthase (eNOS) is not known. While transgenic promoter/reporter mice demonstrated endothelium cell-specific eNOS expression, we found robust expression of episomal eNOS promoter/reporter constructs in cell types that do not express the native eNOS transcript. To explore the mechanism underlying this differential activity pattern of chromatin-versus episomebased eNOS promoters, we examined the methylation status of 5-regulatory sequences of the human eNOS gene. DNA methylation differed dramatically between endothelial and nonendothelial cell types, including vascular smooth muscle cells. This same cell type-specific methylation pattern was observed in vivo in endothelial and vascular smooth muscle cells of the mouse aorta at the native murine eNOS promoter. We addressed the functional consequences of methylation on eNOS transcription using transient transfection of in vitro methylated promoter/reporter constructs and found that methylated constructs exhibited a marked decrease in the synergistic action of Sp1, Sp3, and Ets1 on eNOS promoter activity. The addition of methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 further reduced the transcriptional activity of methylated eNOS constructs. Importantly, chromatin immunoprecipitation demonstrated the presence of Sp1, Sp3, and Ets1 at the native eNOS promoter in endothelial cells but not in vascular smooth muscle cells. Finally, robust expression of eNOS mRNA was induced in nonendothelial cell types following inhibition of DNA methyltransferase activity with 5-azacytidine, demonstrating the importance of DNA methylation-mediated repression. This report is the first to show that promoter DNA methylation plays an important role in the cell-specific expression of a constitutively expressed gene in the vascular endothelium.

Summary. von Willebrand Factor (VWF) is a large multimeric glycoprotein involved in the transport and protection of factor VIII and in mediating platelet±subendothelium and platelet±platelet interactions. We have documented the presence of a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) at nucleotide (nt) 21793 (G 0´36 or C 0´64) in the VWF 5 Hflanking sequence. This polymorphism is in strong linkage disequilibrium with the previously reported SNPs at nts 21234, 21185 and 21051 and, like this other group of polymorphisms, shows a significant association with plasma VWF levels. This association is more marked in subjects who are more than 40 years of age. Further, circumstantial evidence to support a role for the 21793 sequence in regulating VWF expression comes from our demonstration of differential binding of endothelial cell nuclear proteins, including the transcription factor NFkB, by this sequence. In summary, the association of the 21793 SNP with plasma VWF levels provides additional evidence for the role of the VWF regulatory region between nts 21793 and 21051 in controlling VWF expression.

Both genetic and environmental factors contribute to the normal population variability of plasma von Willebrand Factor (vWF) levels, however, regulatory mechanisms at the vWF gene locus itself have not yet been identified. We have investigated the association between polymorphic variation in the 5′-regulatory region of the vWF gene and levels of plasma vWF:Ag in a study of 261 group O blood donors. Three novel single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were identified in the vWF promoter: C/T at -1234, A/G at -1185, and G/A at -1051. These SNPs had identical allele frequencies of 0.36 for the -1234C, -1185A, and -1051G alleles and 0.64 for the -1234T, -1185G, and -1051A alleles and were in strong linkage disequilibrium. In fact, these polymorphisms segregated as two distinct haplotypes: -1234C/-1185A/-1051G (haplotype 1) and -1234T/-1185G/-1051A (haplotype 2) with 12.6% of subjects homozygous for haplotype 1, 40.6% homozygous for haplotype 2, and 42.5% of subjects heterozygous for both haplotypes. Only 4.3% of individuals had other genotypes. A significant association between promoter genotype and level of plasma vWF:Ag was established (analysis of covariance [ANCOVA], P = .008; Kruskal-Wallis test,P = .006); individuals with the CC/AA/GG genotype had the highest mean vWF:Ag levels (0.962 U/mL), intermediate values of vWF:Ag (0.867 U/mL) were observed for heterozygotes (CT/AG/GA), and those with the TT/GG/AA genotype had the lowest mean plasma vWF:Ag levels (0.776 U/mL). Interestingly, when the sample was subgrouped according to age, the significant association between promoter genotype and plasma vWF:Ag level was accentuated in subjects > 40 years of age (analysis of variance [ANOVA], P = .003; Kruskal-Wallis test, P= .001), but was not maintained for subjects ≤ 40 years of age (ANOVA, P > .4; Kruskal-Wallis test, P > .4). In the former subgroup, mean levels of plasma vWF:Ag for subjects with the CC/AA/GG, CT/AG/GA, and TT/GG/AA genotypes were 1.075, 0.954, and 0.794 U/mL, respectively. By searching a transcription factor binding site profile database, these polymorphic sequences were predicted to interact with several transcription factors expressed in endothelial cells, including Sp1, GATA-2, c-Ets, and NFκB. Furthermore, the binding sites at the -1234 and -1051 SNPs appeared to indicate allelic preferences for some of these proteins. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) performed with recombinant human NFκB p50 showed preferential binding of the -1234T allele (confirmed by supershift EMSAs), and EMSAs using bovine aortic endothelial cell (BAEC) nuclear extracts produced specific binding of a nuclear protein to the -1051A allele, but not the -1051G allele. These findings suggest that circulating levels of vWF:Ag may be determined, at least in part, by polymorphic variation in the promoter region of the vWF gene, and that this association may be mediated by differential binding of nuclear proteins involved in the regulation of vWF gene expression.

Both genetic and environmental factors contribute to the normal population variability of plasma von Willebrand Factor (vWF) levels, however, regulatory mechanisms at the vWF gene locus itself have not yet been identified. We have investigated the association between polymorphic variation in the 5′-regulatory region of the vWF gene and levels of plasma vWF:Ag in a study of 261 group O blood donors. Three novel single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were identified in the vWF promoter: C/T at -1234, A/G at -1185, and G/A at -1051. These SNPs had identical allele frequencies of 0.36 for the -1234C, -1185A, and -1051G alleles and 0.64 for the -1234T, -1185G, and -1051A alleles and were in strong linkage disequilibrium. In fact, these polymorphisms segregated as two distinct haplotypes: -1234C/-1185A/-1051G (haplotype 1) and -1234T/-1185G/-1051A (haplotype 2) with 12.6% of subjects homozygous for haplotype 1, 40.6% homozygous for haplotype 2, and 42.5% of subjects heterozygous for both haplotypes. Only 4.3% of individuals had other genotypes. A significant association between promoter genotype and level of plasma vWF:Ag was established (analysis of covariance [ANCOVA], P = .008; Kruskal-Wallis test,P = .006); individuals with the CC/AA/GG genotype had the highest mean vWF:Ag levels (0.962 U/mL), intermediate values of vWF:Ag (0.867 U/mL) were observed for heterozygotes (CT/AG/GA), and those with the TT/GG/AA genotype had the lowest mean plasma vWF:Ag levels (0.776 U/mL). Interestingly, when the sample was subgrouped according to age, the significant association between promoter genotype and plasma vWF:Ag level was accentuated in subjects > 40 years of age (analysis of variance [ANOVA], P = .003; Kruskal-Wallis test, P= .001), but was not maintained for subjects ≤ 40 years of age (ANOVA, P > .4; Kruskal-Wallis test, P > .4). In the former subgroup, mean levels of plasma vWF:Ag for subjects with the CC/AA/GG, CT/AG/GA, and TT/GG/AA genotypes were 1.075, 0.954, and 0.794 U/mL, respectively. By searching a transcription factor binding site profile database, these polymorphic sequences were predicted to interact with several transcription factors expressed in endothelial cells, including Sp1, GATA-2, c-Ets, and NFκB. Furthermore, the binding sites at the -1234 and -1051 SNPs appeared to indicate allelic preferences for some of these proteins. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) performed with recombinant human NFκB p50 showed preferential binding of the -1234T allele (confirmed by supershift EMSAs), and EMSAs using bovine aortic endothelial cell (BAEC) nuclear extracts produced specific binding of a nuclear protein to the -1051A allele, but not the -1051G allele. These findings suggest that circulating levels of vWF:Ag may be determined, at least in part, by polymorphic variation in the promoter region of the vWF gene, and that this association may be mediated by differential binding of nuclear proteins involved in the regulation of vWF gene expression.