Adjuvant analgesics are defined as drugs with a primary indication other than pain that have analgesic properties in some painful conditions. The group includes numerous drugs in diverse classes. Although the widespread use of these drugs as first-line agents in chronic nonmalignant pain syndromes suggests that the term "adjuvant" is a misnomer, they usually are combined with a less-than-satisfactory opioid regimen when administered for cancer pain. Some adjuvant analgesics are useful in several painful conditions and are described as multipurpose adjuvant analgesics (antidepressants, corticosteroids, α α 2 -adrenergic agonists, neuroleptics), whereas others are specific for neuropathic pain (anticonvulsants, local anesthetics, N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists), bone pain (calcitonin, bisphosphonates, radiopharmaceuticals), musculoskeletal pain (muscle relaxants), or pain from bowel obstruction (octreotide, anticholinergics). This article reviews the evidence supporting the use of each class of adjuvant analgesic for the treatment of pain in cancer patients and provides a comprehensive outline of dosing recommendations, side effects, and drug interactions. The Oncologist 2004;9:571-591

and 45 (44%) and 91 (40%) were uninsured, respectively (Table ). In terms of visit characteristics in March through June 2019 and March through June 2020, 55 (54%) and 127 (56%) patients received a naloxone prescription and 45 (44%) and 154 (68%) received treatment resources and/or a referral at discharge, respectively. However, only 4 (4%) and 14 (6%) of the 17 (17%) and 46 (20%) admitted patients received an addiction medicine consult, and 3 (3%) and 23 (10%) accessed treatment at the outpatient clinic after overdosing, respectively.Discussion | In 1 emergency department in Virginia, a greater number of visits for opioid overdoses was observed in the first 4 months of the COVID-19 pandemic, and Black patients made up a relatively larger proportion of opioid overdose visits compared with the previous year. The study has several limitations. First, these findings were from 1 city's emergency department in a small sample of patients and may not be generalizable to other locations. Second, the number of opioid overdoses was underestimated because official reporting of fatal opioid overdoses is delayed and because patients who did not present to the emergency department were not included.These findings demonstrate additional evidence of racial/ethnic disparities in health that have been magnified during the COVID-19 pandemic 3-5 and the recent historical protests. 5 The reasons for the increase in nonfatal opioid overdoses presenting to the emergency department warrant further investigation.

IMPORTANCE Drug overdose deaths continue to increase, despite the leveling off of prescription opioid use and policy changes limiting opioid prescribing. Illicit fentanyl is the leading cause of drug overdose death, and it is important to characterize the emerging combination of other illicit drugs with fentanyl, which increases the risk of overdose. OBJECTIVE To determine whether rates of the combination of nonprescribed fentanyl with cocaine or methamphetamine have changed in urine drug test (UDT) results through time. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This cross-sectional study of UDT results from January 1, 2013, through September 30, 2018, included patient specimens submitted for UDTs by health care professionals as part of routine care. Patients were selected from health care practices across the United States, including substance use disorder treatment centers, pain management practices, primary care practices, behavioral health practices, obstetrics and gynecology practices, and multispecialty groups. The UDT analysis used liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to detect benzoylecgonine (cocaine metabolite), methamphetamine, fentanyl, and norfentanyl. Specimens from individuals reported to have been prescribed fentanyl were excluded. A convenience sample approach was used to randomly select 1 million unique patient UDT specimens from Millennium Health's UDT database for further analysis. Each specimen had associated cocaine, methamphetamine, and fentanyl UDT results. EXPOSURES Medically necessary UDT to detect benzoylecgonine (cocaine metabolite), methamphetamine, fentanyl, and norfentanyl, ordered by a health care professional as part of routine patient care. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Rates of nonprescribed fentanyl positivity among cocaine-or methamphetamine-positive UDT results, quantified through time. RESULTS In a sampling of 1 million unique patients' UDT specimens analyzed for cocaine and fentanyl (median [interquartile range] age, 44 [19-69] years; 55.0% women), positivity rates for nonprescribed fentanyl among the cocaine-positive results increased significantly, from 0.9% (n = 84) (95% CI, 0.7%-1.1%) in 2013 to 17.6% (n = 427) (95% CI, 16.1%-19.1%) in 2018, a 1850% increase (τ = 0.78; z = 9.45; P < .001). In the same sampling of 1 million specimens, positivity rates for nonprescribed fentanyl among the methamphetamine-positive results also increased significantly, from 0.9% (n = 29) (95% CI, 0.6%-1.2%) in 2013 to 7.9% (n = 344) (95% CI, 7.1%-8.7%) in 2018, a 798% increase (τ = 0.72; z = 8.75; P < .001).

No abstract

IMPORTANCE Polysubstance use is a concern for patients treated for opioid use disorder (OUD).While buprenorphine can curtail harmful opioid use, co-occurring use of nonprescribed substances, such as cocaine, methamphetamine, and other opioids, may negatively affect treatment outcomes.OBJECTIVE To characterize factors associated with urine drug positivity for nonprescribed substances among patients prescribed buprenorphine. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTSThis cross-sectional study included patients who had been prescribed buprenorphine and who provided urine specimens for urine drug testing (UDT), as ordered by clinicians in primary care or behavioral health or at substance use disorder treatment centers, from 2013 to 2019. Specimens were analyzed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to assess positivity for several commonly used substances. EXPOSURES Buprenorphine prescription. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURESPositivity for buprenorphine and several nonprescribed substances. Unadjusted trends in positivity for each nonprescribed substance were compared between specimens that did and did not test positive for buprenorphine. Multivariable logistic regression was used to examine factors associated with positivity; factors included patient age, sex, setting of care, payer, collection year, and census division. RESULTSThe study included first UDT specimens from 150 000 patients, of whom 82 107 (54.74%) were men and 77 300 (51.53%) were aged 18 to 34 years. Across all specimens, 128 240 (85.49%) were positive for buprenorphine, and 71 373 (47.58%) were positive for 1 or more nonprescribed substances. From 2013 to 2019, positivity rates increased for most substances (eg, fentanyl: from 131 of 21 412 [0.61%] to 1464 of 13 597 [10.77%]). Factors associated with positivity varied widely by substance; for example, fentanyl positivity was highest for men (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.06-1.21), patients aged 18 to 24 years (OR for patients Ն55 years, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.39-0.54), patients living in New

No abstract

Pain is one of the most common reasons patients seek out healthcare and management typically requires complex medication regimens. Pharmacists have become increasingly more involved in pain management. Historically, pharmacists and physicians have often had adversarial relationships because of regulatory influence. However, as medication experts, pharmacists can play a key role in optimizing outcomes in the management of pain and can be critical to the success of the medication regimen. Numerous opportunities for collaboration exist for pharmacists and physicians in various settings. One example is the VIGIL process, an effective risk management strategy that requires collaboration between pharmacists and physicians. The success of pharmacist-physician collaboration will depend on numerous factors, including strong physician and administrative support. A clear strategy and stepwise approach to developing a pain management pharmacist-physician collaborative practice is the key to its success. Once the collaboration is formalized, a management strategy should also be defined and should include regular chart review and regular feedback from the physician. Through physician-pharmacist collaboration, pain management outcomes can be optimized and risk can be managed.

Results of UDT demonstrate that more than half of samples yield unexpected results from specimens collected in addiction treatment. When comparing results of IA and LC-MS/MS, it is important to consider the limits of IA in the detection of drug use by these patients.