Purpose The purpose of this paper is to extend prior literature regarding the interrelationships between national culture and accounting practices. Design/methodology/approach Using Hofstede’s (1980) cultural indices, the authors employ hierarchical linear modeling to examine the impact of economic growth (emerging markets), country, and culture on real earnings management (REM) for a sample of firms from 31 countries. Findings The results reveal a negative association between REM and Hofstede’s (1980) measures of individualism, masculinity, and uncertainty avoidance, but a positive association with power distance. These results hold even after controlling for discretionary accruals. The results further reveal that measures of investor protection are subsumed by culture. Research limitations/implications The findings are limited by the use of Hofstede’s (1980) data. There is, however, a significant body of research that continues to rely on and support the use of Hofstede’s model. Practical implications The results should be of significant importance to investors who should consider cultural characteristics when assessing firm reported performance, and should prompt auditors and regulators to apply greater scrutiny to the financial reports in cultures characterized by high levels of power distance, especially given the apparent tradeoffs between accruals and REM. Social implications The results reveal that status as an emerging market does not influence managers’ use of REM, and that the strength of a country’s investor protection mechanisms are subsumed by culture. Similarly, accounting systems (e.g. International Financial Reporting Standards), by themselves, do not bring about a convergence of managerial behavior. Rather, investors should consider culture when making decisions regarding capital allocation. Originality/value The increasing trend toward economic globalization and accounting harmonization makes the understanding of differences in accounting practices, and the possible impact of national culture on manager’s decisions, more important than ever. This research links REM to cultural values and tests for evidence that national culture, values, and structures of investor protection affect REM in the ways they affect managers’ attitudes toward the management of earnings through accruals.
Purpose The purpose of this study is to refine what is characterized as real earnings management. Research on real earnings management (REM) has expressed concerns that firms deviating from normal business practices may endure a negative impact on future performance. Not all studies have, however, found a negative impact of REM on future performance. As a consequence, a new stream of research is emerging that examines whether actions that would mechanically be identified as REM are truly earnings management or are simply efficient business activities. The authors further this stream of inquiry by identifying factors, i.e. restructurings and expectations of future sales growth, that can be useful in making a distinction between earnings management and “just business”. Design/methodology/approach To measure REM, the authors rely on two of the proxies of Roychowdhury (2006), abnormal discretionary expenses and abnormal production costs, and regress interactions of these with measures of restructurings and expectations of future sales growth, on future performance. Findings The authors find that when they control for restructurings, reductions in discretionary expenses that would ordinarily be indicative of REM are instead associated with improved future return-on-assets and security returns. They further find that when they control for future sales growth, overproduction is also associated with improved return on sales as it is with future increases in cost of goods sold. Originality/value Together, the results may explain the contradictory results presented in prior research with respect to the impact of REM on future performance – that is, some of what has been identified as REM in prior studies may, in fact, be “just business”.
Purpose This study aims to extend recent research analyzing the effect of auditor busyness on audit quality. Specifically, this study explores the effect on audit quality of a change of fiscal year-end to or from an audit firm’s busy period. Design/methodology/approach Empirical archival. Findings When firms change their fiscal year-end to a period when the auditor is less busy, client firms are rewarded with lower audit fees and auditors are rewarded with a reduction in required effort. This study finds no difference in the level of audit quality after a change in fiscal year-end. Practical implications There are significant implications for audit firms as they may gain cost advantages by successfully promoting off-season fiscal year-ends, and reduce the negative effect on employees associated with “busy season” stress. Similarly, client firms may find that audit costs are reduced when they adopt a less “busy” fiscal year-end. Social implications These results have policy implications for regulators because regulators often dictate the fiscal year-end for certain industries or traded securities. Such dictates may thus introduce inefficiencies into the market for audit services. Originality/value These results should guide regulators in their decisions to dictate fiscal year-ends and firms in their choice of reporting periods.
The examination of the beneficial impact of enterprise resource planning systems (ERPs) on firm performance appears in extensive literature. Prior studies also examine how ERP implementations impact the timeliness of financial information. Few studies, however, address the question of whether the increase in managers' access to accounting data differentially influences managerial behavior. We investigate the association of ERP implementation with managers' flexibility to deviate from normal operating practices to present better financial results. Our findings suggest that after the implementation of an ERP, earnings management through real activities declines. These results particularly indicate that ERP implementations enhance the quality of financial reporting by constraining opportunistic managerial behavior.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.