Background Uncertainty about the optimal respiratory support strategies in critically ill COVID-19 patients is widespread. While the risks and benefits of noninvasive techniques versus early invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) are intensely debated, actual evidence is lacking. We sought to assess the risks and benefits of different respiratory support strategies, employed in intensive care units during the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic on intubation and intensive care unit (ICU) mortality rates. Methods Subanalysis of a prospective, multinational registry of critically ill COVID-19 patients. Patients were subclassified into standard oxygen therapy ≥10 L/min (SOT), high-flow oxygen therapy (HFNC), noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NIV), and early IMV, according to the respiratory support strategy employed at the day of admission to ICU. Propensity score matching was performed to ensure comparability between groups. Results Initially, 1421 patients were assessed for possible study inclusion. Of these, 351 patients (85 SOT, 87 HFNC, 87 NIV, and 92 IMV) remained eligible for full analysis after propensity score matching. 55% of patients initially receiving noninvasive respiratory support required IMV. The intubation rate was lower in patients initially ventilated with HFNC and NIV compared to those who received SOT (SOT: 64%, HFNC: 52%, NIV: 49%, p = 0.025). Compared to the other respiratory support strategies, NIV was associated with a higher overall ICU mortality (SOT: 18%, HFNC: 20%, NIV: 37%, IMV: 25%, p = 0.016). Conclusion In this cohort of critically ill patients with COVID-19, a trial of HFNC appeared to be the most balanced initial respiratory support strategy, given the reduced intubation rate and comparable ICU mortality rate. Nonetheless, considering the uncertainty and stress associated with the COVID-19 pandemic, SOT and early IMV represented safe initial respiratory support strategies. The presented findings, in agreement with classic ARDS literature, suggest that NIV should be avoided whenever possible due to the elevated ICU mortality risk.

Myoclonus is the second most common involuntary non-epileptic movement in intensive care units following tremor-like gestures. Although there are several types of myoclonus, they remain underappreciated, and their diagnostic and prognostic associations are largely ignored. This review discusses clinical, electrophysiological, neuroanatomical, and neuroimaging characteristics of different types of myoclonus in critically ill adults along with their prognostic impact and treatment options. Myoclonus is characterized by a sudden, brief, and sometimes repetitive muscle contraction of body parts, or a brief and sudden cessation of tonic muscle innervation followed by a rapid recovery of tonus. Myoclonus can resemble physiologic and other pathologic involuntary movements. Neurologic injuries, anesthetics, and muscle relaxants interfere with the typical appearance of myoclonus. Identifying "real myoclonus" and determining the neuroanatomical origin are important, as treatment responses depend on the involved neuroanatomical structures. The identification of the type of myoclonus, the involved neuroanatomical structures, and the associated illnesses is essential to direct treatment. In conclusion, the combined clinical, electrophysiological, and neuroradiological examination reliably uncovers the neuroanatomical sources and the pathophysiology of myoclonus. Recognizing cortical myoclonus is critical, as it is treatable and may progress to generalized convulsive seizures or status epilepticus.

No abstract

Early detection of secondary events is a major target of neuromonitoring in critically ill patients. Intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral perfusion pressure are the most widely accepted neuromonitoring parameters. Many studies have shown both to be related to mortality after traumatic brain injury. However, the benefit of ICP monitoring has not been established by a randomized controlled trial, and the efficacy of ICP-guided management has indeed been challenged. This review considers current neuromonitoring techniques in critical care medicine.

No abstract