Background
The anticancer properties of metformin have been suggested in numerous experimental studies and several retrospective clinical studies show that its use is associated with improved outcome of patients with cancer. However, limited data are available for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) treated with targeted therapy. The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the impact of the metformin use on survival of mRCC patients treated with sunitinib or pazopanib.
Methods
Clinical data from 343 patients with mRCC treated with sunitinib or pazopanib in the first line were analyzed. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared according to the use of metformin.
Results
The median PFS and OS for patients using metformin was 31.1 (95% CI 20.6–35.1) and 51.6 (95% CI 44.7-NR) months compared to 9.3 (95% CI 8.0–12.0) and 22.4 (95% CI 19.4–26.8) months for patients not using metformin (
p
<0.0001 and
p
=0.0002, respectively). Cox multivariate analysis shows that the use of metformin remains a significant factor for PFS (HR=0.55 [95% CI 0.343–0.883],
p
=0.013) and also for OS (HR=0.45 [95% CI 0.256–0.794],
p
=0.006).
Conclusion
The present study results suggest that the use of metformin was associated with favorable outcome of mRCC patients treated with sunitinib or pazopanib.
e17519 Background: The clinical management of testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT) has not changed much for decades; most importantly, novel prognostic factors indicating the need of adjuvant chemotherapy and factors related to the development of cisplatin resistance would be needed. Circulating free tumor DNA (cfDNA) is an easily available and valuable source of genetic material, which may bring clinically relevant information. Methods: After ethical committee approval and patient informed consent, peripheral blood (PB) samples were taken from TGCT patients at the diagnosis (after orchidectomy), after 2 cycles of chemotherapy, at the end of treatment, and at relapse or disease progression, if applicable. Clinical data of all patients were recorded. The PB samples were processed immediately after collection, plasma was separated by centrifugation, cfDNA was extracted by QIAmp Circulating Nucleic Acid kits (Qiagen), its quality and quantity was assessed by capillary electrophoresis (Agilent) and qPCR for a house-keeping gene. Selected samples were subjected to whole exome sequencing using SureSelectXT HS + Human All Exon v6 kits (Agilent) on NextSeq (Illumina) platform, together with the corresponding primary testicular tumor and peripheral blood mononuclears as a germ-line control. Statistical analyses were performed using non-parametric tests. Results: Sixty-three samples of 41 patients have been analyzed. The median amount of detected cfDNA did not significantly differ from non-malignant controls, was similar in seminoma and non-seminoma pts, but was significantly higher (p = 0.01) in pts with disease progression. In pts with elevated cfDNA levels, these decreased after 2 and 4 cycles of chemotherapy. In 5 sequenced pts, molecular aberrations (somatic missense or frameshift mutations) were found in genes CDC27 (2 pts), RBMX (4 pts), TPTE2 (3 pts), and TSPAN16 (1 pt). These aberrations were also detected in primary tumors but with lower frequencies, and were not present in germ-line DNA. CDC27 mutations have been described in TGCT previously. The other genes have not yet been linked to TGCT, although their role in spermatogenesis and cell proliferation is well known. The presence of mitochondrial DNA was not detected in cfDNA. Conclusions: High levels of cfDNA are detectable in pts with disease progression where they reflect the total tumor load; the molecular analysis of cfDNA revealed novel aberrations that may play a role in TGCT development. Supported by grants MH CZ - DRO00064190TN, CDRO00064203FNM and MEYS NPU I LO1604
The aim of this study was to retrospectively analyze treatment outcomes and tolerance in patients in whom cabozantinib was used after previous targeted therapy. Patients and Methods. Cabozantinib was administered in dose 60 mg/day, a subset of patients received initial dose of 40 mg/day. The treatment was administered until to progression or unacceptable toxicity. CT scans were assessed according to the RECIST 1.1 and toxicity of treatment was assessed based on the CTCAE (version 4). Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to calculate progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). We performed a multivariate analysis of risk factors for treatment outcomes (PFS, OS) by Cox regression analysis. All statistics were evaluated at the significance level alpha = 0.05. Results. 54 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) were evaluated. Median PFS in all patients treated with cabozantinib was 9.3 months (95% CI 5.3 -13.3). One-year survival was 85.2% (95% CI 72.9 -93.4%). Treatment response was observed in 45.9% of cases, including one complete remission. Cox regression analysis demonstrated that presence of subsequent treatment was the only factor with a significant effect on OS (P=0.008). Adverse events occurred in 88.9% of patients, grade 3 -4 in 46.3%.
Conclusion.The analysis of our cohort of patients treated with cabozantinib in the second or higher lines of treatment showed that cabozantinib represents an effective and safe therapy and contributes to longer survival of our mRCC patients
Conclusions: Interrogative BiologyÒ platform analytics was employed to infer causal relationships between existing pancreatic cancer therapies and longitudinal alterations in the proteomic, metabolomic, and lipidomic responses to 253 treatment interventions and 211 progression events. We believe this cohort to be the largest high-fidelity pan-omic characterization of pancreatic cancer and its risk factors..
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.