Every species has certain habitat requirements, which may be altered by interactions with
other co-occurring species. These interactions are mostly ignored in predictive models
trying to identify key habitat variables correlated with species population
abundance/occurrence. We investigated how the structure of the urban landscape, food
resources, potential competitors, predators, and interaction between these factors
influence the abundance of house sparrow Passer domesticus and the tree
sparrow P. montanus in sixty 25 ha plots distributed randomly across
residential areas of the city of Poznań (Poland). The abundance of the house sparrow was
positively correlated with the abundance of pigeons but negatively correlated with
human-related food resources. There were significant interaction terms between abundances
of other urban species and habitat variables in statistical models. For example, the
abundance of house sparrow was negatively correlated with the abundance of corvids and
tree sparrows but only when food resources were low. The abundance of tree sparrows
positively correlated with density of streets and the distance from the city center. The
abundance of this species positively correlated with the abundance of corvids when food
resources were low but negatively correlated at low covers of green area. Our study
indicates that associations between food resources, habitat covers, and the relative
abundance of two sparrow species are altered by the abundance of other urban species.
Competition, niche separation and social facilitation may be responsible for these
interactive effects. Thus, biotic interactions should be included not only as an additive
effect but also as an interaction term between abundance and habitat variables in
statistical models predicting species abundance and occurrence.
Large mammals are often a source of conflict, and consequently there has been increasing interest in close encounters with them. Knowledge of wildlife responses to human disturbance is crucial for the management of increasing and expanding populations of large animals. We investigated flight initiation distance (FID) and aggressive responses of the European bison–the largest terrestrial mammal of Europe–to human disturbance in the Białowieża Forest (NE Poland). When encountered by humans, bison usually flee. Aggression was observed in only 0.4% of approach attempts. Mean FID was 77±46 m and was influenced by habitat, sex, and supplementary feeding intensity. Females showed greater timidity than males, FID was lower in forest than in open habitats, and supplementary feeding caused a drop in FID. In 84.5% of all documented aggression cases, bison attacks were provoked by humans approaching too close to the bison or by deliberate scaring them. Males were more aggressive than females, and attacked mainly during the rut, while females attacked during the winter and calving. Bison attacked in built-up areas significantly more often than expected. The mean critical distance of attacks was 21±2 m. Most attacks took the form of a short chase preceded by warning signs. Goring was observed in 22.7% of all aggression cases and no fatalities were recorded. Our study shows that bison are not dangerous animals and only manifest aggression in response to prolonged disturbance at close ranges. The education of people and recommendations for minimum approach distances should ensure a low rate of disturbance and safety when encountering large mammals.
BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses.
As a result of species protection in Poland, wolves now appear in places that are attractive for human recreation, increasing their exposure to dogs. This creates a risk of spontaneous direct interactions between these two canine species. Aggressive interactions between the gray wolf and the domestic dog lead to human–large predator conflicts. This study examined wolf–dog interactions using data collected in an online questionnaire and included questions related to factors that might influence the likelihood of interactions between these canines. One of the most important factors affecting the likelihood of interaction between a dog and a wolf was the distance between the dog and the human. The number of wolves was also important—the more wolves, the more likely they were to interact with dogs. The risk of interaction also significantly increases with decreasing distance to human settlements. There were also statistical differences in terms of the type of outdoor activity being engaged in. Hunting was seven times more likely to result in a wolf–dog interaction than normal walk. We postulate that the choices made by the human (dog control and type of recreation) caring for the dog are an important factor that can reduce the risk of direct contact between dogs and wolves.
Motives: Unlike nature monitoring, recreational activities in forests are not monitored regularly or over wide areas. Therefore, research studies involving various methodologies are needed to generate valuable data for forest management.
Aim: The aim of the present study was to identify different types of forest recreational activities in Wdecki Landscape Park based on data recorded by seven camera traps between 12 December 2019 and 12 December 2020.
Results: The collected data revealed that walking, biking, and mushroom picking were the most popular recreational activities. Most activities were undertaken by single visitors or groups of two visitors between 10:00 a.m. and 4:00 p.m., mostly on weekends and in the autumn.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.